Cargando…

Combination of paper membrane-based filtration and ultrafiltration to enhance the detection of MNV, HAV, and HCoV from soil-rich post-washing water

Risk-assessing and controlling virus transmission from soil-rich post-washing water (PWW) are crucial during harvesting raw vegetables. However, viruses are normally difficult to concentrate because of their low concentrations and complex backgrounds. Here, ultrafiltration (UF), virus adsorption-elu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Zhaoqi, Jung, Soontag, Yeo, Daseul, Woo, Seoyoung, Seo, Yeeun, Hossain, Md. Iqbal, Kwon, Hyojin, Jeong, Myeong-In, Choi, Changsun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9722473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36483016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.105640
Descripción
Sumario:Risk-assessing and controlling virus transmission from soil-rich post-washing water (PWW) are crucial during harvesting raw vegetables. However, viruses are normally difficult to concentrate because of their low concentrations and complex backgrounds. Here, ultrafiltration (UF), virus adsorption-elution (VIRADEL), and optimized paper filtration-coupled ultrafiltration (PFC-UF) methods were employed to evaluate the recovery of non-enveloped murine norovirus (MNV-1), hepatitis A virus (HAV), and enveloped human coronavirus 229E (HCoV-229E) from soil-rich PWW. Among the three methods, PFC-UF outperformed the other methods in the recovery of viruses from PWW with soil content. Under the highest soil condition with virus seeded at a titer of 10(2) plaque-forming unit (PFU) or TCID(50), the PFC-UF method exhibited an exceedingly consistent recovery rate of 78.8 ± 13.3 (MNV-1) and 44.4 ± 25.2% (HAV). However, the recovery of enveloped HCoV-229E was inferior to non-enveloped viruses. Overall, PFC-UF provided a reliable method for recovering viruses in soil-rich PWW.