Cargando…
Combination of paper membrane-based filtration and ultrafiltration to enhance the detection of MNV, HAV, and HCoV from soil-rich post-washing water
Risk-assessing and controlling virus transmission from soil-rich post-washing water (PWW) are crucial during harvesting raw vegetables. However, viruses are normally difficult to concentrate because of their low concentrations and complex backgrounds. Here, ultrafiltration (UF), virus adsorption-elu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9722473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36483016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.105640 |
Sumario: | Risk-assessing and controlling virus transmission from soil-rich post-washing water (PWW) are crucial during harvesting raw vegetables. However, viruses are normally difficult to concentrate because of their low concentrations and complex backgrounds. Here, ultrafiltration (UF), virus adsorption-elution (VIRADEL), and optimized paper filtration-coupled ultrafiltration (PFC-UF) methods were employed to evaluate the recovery of non-enveloped murine norovirus (MNV-1), hepatitis A virus (HAV), and enveloped human coronavirus 229E (HCoV-229E) from soil-rich PWW. Among the three methods, PFC-UF outperformed the other methods in the recovery of viruses from PWW with soil content. Under the highest soil condition with virus seeded at a titer of 10(2) plaque-forming unit (PFU) or TCID(50), the PFC-UF method exhibited an exceedingly consistent recovery rate of 78.8 ± 13.3 (MNV-1) and 44.4 ± 25.2% (HAV). However, the recovery of enveloped HCoV-229E was inferior to non-enveloped viruses. Overall, PFC-UF provided a reliable method for recovering viruses in soil-rich PWW. |
---|