Cargando…

Soil qualities and change rules of Eucalyptus grandis × Eucalyptus urophylla plantation with different slash disposals

Slash disposal changes soil quality by affecting soil properties and nutrient cycling, and the appropriate disposal approaches remain controversial. This work aimed to explore the impact of different slash disposal methods on soil qualities. For this purpose, a Eucalyptus grandis × Eucalyptus urophy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Lin, Chen, Zongfu, Wu, Qinzhan, Huang, Kangting, Wen, Jianke, Li, Hui, Zhu, Lingyue, Tang, Yabin, Chen, Lijun, Wu, Lichao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9722714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36471094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25687-0
_version_ 1784844014988558336
author Zhang, Lin
Chen, Zongfu
Wu, Qinzhan
Huang, Kangting
Wen, Jianke
Li, Hui
Zhu, Lingyue
Tang, Yabin
Chen, Lijun
Wu, Lichao
author_facet Zhang, Lin
Chen, Zongfu
Wu, Qinzhan
Huang, Kangting
Wen, Jianke
Li, Hui
Zhu, Lingyue
Tang, Yabin
Chen, Lijun
Wu, Lichao
author_sort Zhang, Lin
collection PubMed
description Slash disposal changes soil quality by affecting soil properties and nutrient cycling, and the appropriate disposal approaches remain controversial. This work aimed to explore the impact of different slash disposal methods on soil qualities. For this purpose, a Eucalyptus grandis × Eucalyptus urophylla plantation that had been cultivated in 2002 and felled for the third time in 2016 was established in Hezhou City, China. Burning forest (BF, for moderate intensity fire) and no-burning forest (NF) were set in the plantation, and the native evergreen broadleaf forest near the plantation was used as the control (CK). Soils were sampled quarterly in 2017, and 27 indicators that represent soil physical, chemical, and biological properties were analyzed and compared through the analysis of the sustainability index (SI), which adopts five indices to calculate soil quality. The obtained data showed that the indicators of BF and NF, except for the total potassium content, were much lower than those of CK. The physical properties (Max-WHC, CWHC, Min-WHC, MMC, CPD, TPD) of NF were significantly better (29.07%, 30.98%, 29.61%, 52.08%, 21.89%, 19.76%) than those of BF, unlike the chemical properties of BF (SOM, TN, ACa, AFe, AMn, ACu, AZn) were significantly better than those of NF (45.61%, 81.33%, 12.78%, 23.18%, 96.13%, 144.30%, 114.04%). The enzymatic activities of NF (URE, APHO) were significantly better (43.33%, 156.58%)than those of BF, except the activities of INV (− 25.21%). Results of SI showed that the soil quality of CK was much better than that of BF, and NF the worst. But it exhibited the most unevenness of CK, followed by NF, and BF the best. The change rules of BF and NF were contrasting, and soil quality reached the same level after half a year. In summary, the soil qualities, either BF or CK, were not comparable to that of CK. BF increased the soil quality fleetly and transiently, and NF was sustainable for the eucalyptus plantation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9722714
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97227142022-12-07 Soil qualities and change rules of Eucalyptus grandis × Eucalyptus urophylla plantation with different slash disposals Zhang, Lin Chen, Zongfu Wu, Qinzhan Huang, Kangting Wen, Jianke Li, Hui Zhu, Lingyue Tang, Yabin Chen, Lijun Wu, Lichao Sci Rep Article Slash disposal changes soil quality by affecting soil properties and nutrient cycling, and the appropriate disposal approaches remain controversial. This work aimed to explore the impact of different slash disposal methods on soil qualities. For this purpose, a Eucalyptus grandis × Eucalyptus urophylla plantation that had been cultivated in 2002 and felled for the third time in 2016 was established in Hezhou City, China. Burning forest (BF, for moderate intensity fire) and no-burning forest (NF) were set in the plantation, and the native evergreen broadleaf forest near the plantation was used as the control (CK). Soils were sampled quarterly in 2017, and 27 indicators that represent soil physical, chemical, and biological properties were analyzed and compared through the analysis of the sustainability index (SI), which adopts five indices to calculate soil quality. The obtained data showed that the indicators of BF and NF, except for the total potassium content, were much lower than those of CK. The physical properties (Max-WHC, CWHC, Min-WHC, MMC, CPD, TPD) of NF were significantly better (29.07%, 30.98%, 29.61%, 52.08%, 21.89%, 19.76%) than those of BF, unlike the chemical properties of BF (SOM, TN, ACa, AFe, AMn, ACu, AZn) were significantly better than those of NF (45.61%, 81.33%, 12.78%, 23.18%, 96.13%, 144.30%, 114.04%). The enzymatic activities of NF (URE, APHO) were significantly better (43.33%, 156.58%)than those of BF, except the activities of INV (− 25.21%). Results of SI showed that the soil quality of CK was much better than that of BF, and NF the worst. But it exhibited the most unevenness of CK, followed by NF, and BF the best. The change rules of BF and NF were contrasting, and soil quality reached the same level after half a year. In summary, the soil qualities, either BF or CK, were not comparable to that of CK. BF increased the soil quality fleetly and transiently, and NF was sustainable for the eucalyptus plantation. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9722714/ /pubmed/36471094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25687-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Zhang, Lin
Chen, Zongfu
Wu, Qinzhan
Huang, Kangting
Wen, Jianke
Li, Hui
Zhu, Lingyue
Tang, Yabin
Chen, Lijun
Wu, Lichao
Soil qualities and change rules of Eucalyptus grandis × Eucalyptus urophylla plantation with different slash disposals
title Soil qualities and change rules of Eucalyptus grandis × Eucalyptus urophylla plantation with different slash disposals
title_full Soil qualities and change rules of Eucalyptus grandis × Eucalyptus urophylla plantation with different slash disposals
title_fullStr Soil qualities and change rules of Eucalyptus grandis × Eucalyptus urophylla plantation with different slash disposals
title_full_unstemmed Soil qualities and change rules of Eucalyptus grandis × Eucalyptus urophylla plantation with different slash disposals
title_short Soil qualities and change rules of Eucalyptus grandis × Eucalyptus urophylla plantation with different slash disposals
title_sort soil qualities and change rules of eucalyptus grandis × eucalyptus urophylla plantation with different slash disposals
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9722714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36471094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25687-0
work_keys_str_mv AT zhanglin soilqualitiesandchangerulesofeucalyptusgrandiseucalyptusurophyllaplantationwithdifferentslashdisposals
AT chenzongfu soilqualitiesandchangerulesofeucalyptusgrandiseucalyptusurophyllaplantationwithdifferentslashdisposals
AT wuqinzhan soilqualitiesandchangerulesofeucalyptusgrandiseucalyptusurophyllaplantationwithdifferentslashdisposals
AT huangkangting soilqualitiesandchangerulesofeucalyptusgrandiseucalyptusurophyllaplantationwithdifferentslashdisposals
AT wenjianke soilqualitiesandchangerulesofeucalyptusgrandiseucalyptusurophyllaplantationwithdifferentslashdisposals
AT lihui soilqualitiesandchangerulesofeucalyptusgrandiseucalyptusurophyllaplantationwithdifferentslashdisposals
AT zhulingyue soilqualitiesandchangerulesofeucalyptusgrandiseucalyptusurophyllaplantationwithdifferentslashdisposals
AT tangyabin soilqualitiesandchangerulesofeucalyptusgrandiseucalyptusurophyllaplantationwithdifferentslashdisposals
AT chenlijun soilqualitiesandchangerulesofeucalyptusgrandiseucalyptusurophyllaplantationwithdifferentslashdisposals
AT wulichao soilqualitiesandchangerulesofeucalyptusgrandiseucalyptusurophyllaplantationwithdifferentslashdisposals