Cargando…

Clinical outcomes of single-stage versus two-stage laparoscopic Roux-en-y gastric bypass in the management of obesity (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m(2)): a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) in patients with obesity, BMI ≥ 50 kg/m(2), can be a challenging operation. Weight loss with intra-gastric balloon (IGB) insertion prior to LRYGB may improve operative outcomes. METHODS: Between June 2000 and June 2020, patients with a BMI ≥ ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fadel, Michael G, Fehervari, Matyas, Lairy, Ali, Das, Bibek, Alyaqout, Khaled, Ashrafian, Hutan, Khwaja, Haris, Efthimiou, Evangelos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9722810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36050499
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-022-02664-9
_version_ 1784844038808010752
author Fadel, Michael G
Fehervari, Matyas
Lairy, Ali
Das, Bibek
Alyaqout, Khaled
Ashrafian, Hutan
Khwaja, Haris
Efthimiou, Evangelos
author_facet Fadel, Michael G
Fehervari, Matyas
Lairy, Ali
Das, Bibek
Alyaqout, Khaled
Ashrafian, Hutan
Khwaja, Haris
Efthimiou, Evangelos
author_sort Fadel, Michael G
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) in patients with obesity, BMI ≥ 50 kg/m(2), can be a challenging operation. Weight loss with intra-gastric balloon (IGB) insertion prior to LRYGB may improve operative outcomes. METHODS: Between June 2000 and June 2020, patients with a BMI ≥ 50 kg/m(2) underwent either IGB insertion followed by LRYGB (two-stage group), or LRYGB as the definitive bariatric procedure (single-stage group) in our institution. The two-stage procedure was adopted for high risk individuals. Primary outcome measures were percentage total weight loss (%TWL) at 24 months, length of stay and postoperative morbidity. Propensity score analysis was used to account for differences between groups. RESULTS: A total of 155 (mean age 42.9 years ± 10.60; mean BMI 54.6 kg/m(2) ± 4.53) underwent either the two-stage (n = 30) or single-stage procedure (n = 125) depending on preoperative fitness. At 6 months following LRYGB, there was a significant difference in %TWL between the groups in a matched analysis (11.9% vs 23.7%, p < 0.001). At 24 months, there was no difference in %TWL (32.0% vs 34.7%, p = 0.13). Median hospital stay following LRYGB was 2.0 (1-4) days with the two-stage vs 2.0 (0-14) days for the single-stage approach (p = 0.75). There was also no significant difference in complication rates (p = 0.058) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in weight loss after one or two-stage procedures in the treatment of patients with a BMI ≥ 50 kg/m(2 )super obesity in a propensity score weighted analysis at 24 months. Length of stay and perioperative complications were similar for high risk patients; however, the two-stage approach was associated with delayed weight loss. Single-stage management is recommended for moderate risk patients, particularly with significant metabolic disorders, whilst two-stage approach is a safe and feasible pathway for high risk individuals. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00423-022-02664-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9722810
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97228102022-12-07 Clinical outcomes of single-stage versus two-stage laparoscopic Roux-en-y gastric bypass in the management of obesity (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m(2)): a retrospective cohort study Fadel, Michael G Fehervari, Matyas Lairy, Ali Das, Bibek Alyaqout, Khaled Ashrafian, Hutan Khwaja, Haris Efthimiou, Evangelos Langenbecks Arch Surg Research BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) in patients with obesity, BMI ≥ 50 kg/m(2), can be a challenging operation. Weight loss with intra-gastric balloon (IGB) insertion prior to LRYGB may improve operative outcomes. METHODS: Between June 2000 and June 2020, patients with a BMI ≥ 50 kg/m(2) underwent either IGB insertion followed by LRYGB (two-stage group), or LRYGB as the definitive bariatric procedure (single-stage group) in our institution. The two-stage procedure was adopted for high risk individuals. Primary outcome measures were percentage total weight loss (%TWL) at 24 months, length of stay and postoperative morbidity. Propensity score analysis was used to account for differences between groups. RESULTS: A total of 155 (mean age 42.9 years ± 10.60; mean BMI 54.6 kg/m(2) ± 4.53) underwent either the two-stage (n = 30) or single-stage procedure (n = 125) depending on preoperative fitness. At 6 months following LRYGB, there was a significant difference in %TWL between the groups in a matched analysis (11.9% vs 23.7%, p < 0.001). At 24 months, there was no difference in %TWL (32.0% vs 34.7%, p = 0.13). Median hospital stay following LRYGB was 2.0 (1-4) days with the two-stage vs 2.0 (0-14) days for the single-stage approach (p = 0.75). There was also no significant difference in complication rates (p = 0.058) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in weight loss after one or two-stage procedures in the treatment of patients with a BMI ≥ 50 kg/m(2 )super obesity in a propensity score weighted analysis at 24 months. Length of stay and perioperative complications were similar for high risk patients; however, the two-stage approach was associated with delayed weight loss. Single-stage management is recommended for moderate risk patients, particularly with significant metabolic disorders, whilst two-stage approach is a safe and feasible pathway for high risk individuals. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00423-022-02664-9. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-09-02 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9722810/ /pubmed/36050499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-022-02664-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Fadel, Michael G
Fehervari, Matyas
Lairy, Ali
Das, Bibek
Alyaqout, Khaled
Ashrafian, Hutan
Khwaja, Haris
Efthimiou, Evangelos
Clinical outcomes of single-stage versus two-stage laparoscopic Roux-en-y gastric bypass in the management of obesity (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m(2)): a retrospective cohort study
title Clinical outcomes of single-stage versus two-stage laparoscopic Roux-en-y gastric bypass in the management of obesity (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m(2)): a retrospective cohort study
title_full Clinical outcomes of single-stage versus two-stage laparoscopic Roux-en-y gastric bypass in the management of obesity (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m(2)): a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Clinical outcomes of single-stage versus two-stage laparoscopic Roux-en-y gastric bypass in the management of obesity (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m(2)): a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical outcomes of single-stage versus two-stage laparoscopic Roux-en-y gastric bypass in the management of obesity (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m(2)): a retrospective cohort study
title_short Clinical outcomes of single-stage versus two-stage laparoscopic Roux-en-y gastric bypass in the management of obesity (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m(2)): a retrospective cohort study
title_sort clinical outcomes of single-stage versus two-stage laparoscopic roux-en-y gastric bypass in the management of obesity (bmi ≥ 50 kg/m(2)): a retrospective cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9722810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36050499
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-022-02664-9
work_keys_str_mv AT fadelmichaelg clinicaloutcomesofsinglestageversustwostagelaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypassinthemanagementofobesitybmi50kgm2aretrospectivecohortstudy
AT fehervarimatyas clinicaloutcomesofsinglestageversustwostagelaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypassinthemanagementofobesitybmi50kgm2aretrospectivecohortstudy
AT lairyali clinicaloutcomesofsinglestageversustwostagelaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypassinthemanagementofobesitybmi50kgm2aretrospectivecohortstudy
AT dasbibek clinicaloutcomesofsinglestageversustwostagelaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypassinthemanagementofobesitybmi50kgm2aretrospectivecohortstudy
AT alyaqoutkhaled clinicaloutcomesofsinglestageversustwostagelaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypassinthemanagementofobesitybmi50kgm2aretrospectivecohortstudy
AT ashrafianhutan clinicaloutcomesofsinglestageversustwostagelaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypassinthemanagementofobesitybmi50kgm2aretrospectivecohortstudy
AT khwajaharis clinicaloutcomesofsinglestageversustwostagelaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypassinthemanagementofobesitybmi50kgm2aretrospectivecohortstudy
AT efthimiouevangelos clinicaloutcomesofsinglestageversustwostagelaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypassinthemanagementofobesitybmi50kgm2aretrospectivecohortstudy