Cargando…

Improving analysis of the vaginal microbiota of women undergoing assisted reproduction using nanopore sequencing

PURPOSE: Subclinical alterations of the vaginal microbiome have been described to be associated with female infertility and may serve as predictors for failure of in vitro fertilization treatment. While large prospective studies to delineate the role of microbial composition are warranted, integrati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lüth, Theresa, Graspeuntner, Simon, Neumann, Kay, Kirchhoff, Laura, Masuch, Antonia, Schaake, Susen, Lupatsii, Mariia, Tse, Ronnie, Griesinger, Georg, Trinh, Joanne, Rupp, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9722992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36223010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02628-4
_version_ 1784844078053064704
author Lüth, Theresa
Graspeuntner, Simon
Neumann, Kay
Kirchhoff, Laura
Masuch, Antonia
Schaake, Susen
Lupatsii, Mariia
Tse, Ronnie
Griesinger, Georg
Trinh, Joanne
Rupp, Jan
author_facet Lüth, Theresa
Graspeuntner, Simon
Neumann, Kay
Kirchhoff, Laura
Masuch, Antonia
Schaake, Susen
Lupatsii, Mariia
Tse, Ronnie
Griesinger, Georg
Trinh, Joanne
Rupp, Jan
author_sort Lüth, Theresa
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Subclinical alterations of the vaginal microbiome have been described to be associated with female infertility and may serve as predictors for failure of in vitro fertilization treatment. While large prospective studies to delineate the role of microbial composition are warranted, integrating microbiome information into clinical management depends on economical and practical feasibility, specifically on a short duration from sampling to final results. The currently most used method for microbiota analysis is either metagenomics sequencing or amplicon-based microbiota analysis using second-generation methods such as sequencing-by-synthesis approaches (Illumina), which is both expensive and time-consuming. Thus, additional approaches are warranted to accelerate the usability of the microbiome as a marker in clinical praxis. METHODS: Herein, we used a set of ten selected vaginal swabs from women undergoing assisted reproduction, comparing and performing critical optimization of nanopore-based microbiota analysis with the results from MiSeq-based data as a quality reference. RESULTS: The analyzed samples carried varying community compositions, as shown by amplicon-based analysis of the V3V4 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene by MiSeq sequencing. Using a stepwise procedure to optimize adaptation, we show that a close approximation of the microbial composition can be achieved within a reduced time frame and at a minimum of costs using nanopore sequencing. CONCLUSIONS: Our work highlights the potential of a nanopore-based methodical setup to support the feasibility of interventional studies and contribute to the development of microbiome-based clinical decision-making in assisted reproduction. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10815-022-02628-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9722992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97229922022-12-07 Improving analysis of the vaginal microbiota of women undergoing assisted reproduction using nanopore sequencing Lüth, Theresa Graspeuntner, Simon Neumann, Kay Kirchhoff, Laura Masuch, Antonia Schaake, Susen Lupatsii, Mariia Tse, Ronnie Griesinger, Georg Trinh, Joanne Rupp, Jan J Assist Reprod Genet Reproductive Physiology and Disease PURPOSE: Subclinical alterations of the vaginal microbiome have been described to be associated with female infertility and may serve as predictors for failure of in vitro fertilization treatment. While large prospective studies to delineate the role of microbial composition are warranted, integrating microbiome information into clinical management depends on economical and practical feasibility, specifically on a short duration from sampling to final results. The currently most used method for microbiota analysis is either metagenomics sequencing or amplicon-based microbiota analysis using second-generation methods such as sequencing-by-synthesis approaches (Illumina), which is both expensive and time-consuming. Thus, additional approaches are warranted to accelerate the usability of the microbiome as a marker in clinical praxis. METHODS: Herein, we used a set of ten selected vaginal swabs from women undergoing assisted reproduction, comparing and performing critical optimization of nanopore-based microbiota analysis with the results from MiSeq-based data as a quality reference. RESULTS: The analyzed samples carried varying community compositions, as shown by amplicon-based analysis of the V3V4 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene by MiSeq sequencing. Using a stepwise procedure to optimize adaptation, we show that a close approximation of the microbial composition can be achieved within a reduced time frame and at a minimum of costs using nanopore sequencing. CONCLUSIONS: Our work highlights the potential of a nanopore-based methodical setup to support the feasibility of interventional studies and contribute to the development of microbiome-based clinical decision-making in assisted reproduction. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10815-022-02628-4. Springer US 2022-10-12 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9722992/ /pubmed/36223010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02628-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Reproductive Physiology and Disease
Lüth, Theresa
Graspeuntner, Simon
Neumann, Kay
Kirchhoff, Laura
Masuch, Antonia
Schaake, Susen
Lupatsii, Mariia
Tse, Ronnie
Griesinger, Georg
Trinh, Joanne
Rupp, Jan
Improving analysis of the vaginal microbiota of women undergoing assisted reproduction using nanopore sequencing
title Improving analysis of the vaginal microbiota of women undergoing assisted reproduction using nanopore sequencing
title_full Improving analysis of the vaginal microbiota of women undergoing assisted reproduction using nanopore sequencing
title_fullStr Improving analysis of the vaginal microbiota of women undergoing assisted reproduction using nanopore sequencing
title_full_unstemmed Improving analysis of the vaginal microbiota of women undergoing assisted reproduction using nanopore sequencing
title_short Improving analysis of the vaginal microbiota of women undergoing assisted reproduction using nanopore sequencing
title_sort improving analysis of the vaginal microbiota of women undergoing assisted reproduction using nanopore sequencing
topic Reproductive Physiology and Disease
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9722992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36223010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02628-4
work_keys_str_mv AT luththeresa improvinganalysisofthevaginalmicrobiotaofwomenundergoingassistedreproductionusingnanoporesequencing
AT graspeuntnersimon improvinganalysisofthevaginalmicrobiotaofwomenundergoingassistedreproductionusingnanoporesequencing
AT neumannkay improvinganalysisofthevaginalmicrobiotaofwomenundergoingassistedreproductionusingnanoporesequencing
AT kirchhofflaura improvinganalysisofthevaginalmicrobiotaofwomenundergoingassistedreproductionusingnanoporesequencing
AT masuchantonia improvinganalysisofthevaginalmicrobiotaofwomenundergoingassistedreproductionusingnanoporesequencing
AT schaakesusen improvinganalysisofthevaginalmicrobiotaofwomenundergoingassistedreproductionusingnanoporesequencing
AT lupatsiimariia improvinganalysisofthevaginalmicrobiotaofwomenundergoingassistedreproductionusingnanoporesequencing
AT tseronnie improvinganalysisofthevaginalmicrobiotaofwomenundergoingassistedreproductionusingnanoporesequencing
AT griesingergeorg improvinganalysisofthevaginalmicrobiotaofwomenundergoingassistedreproductionusingnanoporesequencing
AT trinhjoanne improvinganalysisofthevaginalmicrobiotaofwomenundergoingassistedreproductionusingnanoporesequencing
AT ruppjan improvinganalysisofthevaginalmicrobiotaofwomenundergoingassistedreproductionusingnanoporesequencing