Cargando…

Drivers of habitat quality for a reintroduced elk herd

Understanding spatiotemporal variation in habitat quality is essential for guiding wildlife reintroduction and restoration programs. The habitat productivity hypothesis posits that home range size is inversely related to habitat quality. Thus, home range size may be used as a proxy for habitat quali...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quinlan, Braiden A., Rosenberger, Jacalyn P., Kalb, David M., Abernathy, Heather N., Thorne, Emily D., Ford, W. Mark, Cherry, Michael J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9723100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36470959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25058-9
_version_ 1784844089363005440
author Quinlan, Braiden A.
Rosenberger, Jacalyn P.
Kalb, David M.
Abernathy, Heather N.
Thorne, Emily D.
Ford, W. Mark
Cherry, Michael J.
author_facet Quinlan, Braiden A.
Rosenberger, Jacalyn P.
Kalb, David M.
Abernathy, Heather N.
Thorne, Emily D.
Ford, W. Mark
Cherry, Michael J.
author_sort Quinlan, Braiden A.
collection PubMed
description Understanding spatiotemporal variation in habitat quality is essential for guiding wildlife reintroduction and restoration programs. The habitat productivity hypothesis posits that home range size is inversely related to habitat quality. Thus, home range size may be used as a proxy for habitat quality and can identify important land cover features for a recovering species. We sought to quantify variation in home range size across the biological cycle (seasons) for a reintroduced elk (Cervus canadensis) population in southwestern Virginia, USA and quantify habitat quality by linking home range sizes to the land cover types they contain using linear mixed-effects models. We found mean home range size was largest during late gestation for female elk. Additionally, throughout the year, smaller home ranges were associated with larger proportions of non-forested habitats whereas forested habitats were generally the opposite. However, both presumed poor- and high-quality habitats influenced female elk space use. Our approach revealed spatial variation in habitat quality for a recovering elk herd, demonstrated the importance of non-forested habitats to elk, can guide decisions regarding the location of future elk reintroduction programs, and serve as a model for evaluating habitat quality associated with wildlife reintroductions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9723100
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97231002022-12-07 Drivers of habitat quality for a reintroduced elk herd Quinlan, Braiden A. Rosenberger, Jacalyn P. Kalb, David M. Abernathy, Heather N. Thorne, Emily D. Ford, W. Mark Cherry, Michael J. Sci Rep Article Understanding spatiotemporal variation in habitat quality is essential for guiding wildlife reintroduction and restoration programs. The habitat productivity hypothesis posits that home range size is inversely related to habitat quality. Thus, home range size may be used as a proxy for habitat quality and can identify important land cover features for a recovering species. We sought to quantify variation in home range size across the biological cycle (seasons) for a reintroduced elk (Cervus canadensis) population in southwestern Virginia, USA and quantify habitat quality by linking home range sizes to the land cover types they contain using linear mixed-effects models. We found mean home range size was largest during late gestation for female elk. Additionally, throughout the year, smaller home ranges were associated with larger proportions of non-forested habitats whereas forested habitats were generally the opposite. However, both presumed poor- and high-quality habitats influenced female elk space use. Our approach revealed spatial variation in habitat quality for a recovering elk herd, demonstrated the importance of non-forested habitats to elk, can guide decisions regarding the location of future elk reintroduction programs, and serve as a model for evaluating habitat quality associated with wildlife reintroductions. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9723100/ /pubmed/36470959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25058-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Quinlan, Braiden A.
Rosenberger, Jacalyn P.
Kalb, David M.
Abernathy, Heather N.
Thorne, Emily D.
Ford, W. Mark
Cherry, Michael J.
Drivers of habitat quality for a reintroduced elk herd
title Drivers of habitat quality for a reintroduced elk herd
title_full Drivers of habitat quality for a reintroduced elk herd
title_fullStr Drivers of habitat quality for a reintroduced elk herd
title_full_unstemmed Drivers of habitat quality for a reintroduced elk herd
title_short Drivers of habitat quality for a reintroduced elk herd
title_sort drivers of habitat quality for a reintroduced elk herd
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9723100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36470959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25058-9
work_keys_str_mv AT quinlanbraidena driversofhabitatqualityforareintroducedelkherd
AT rosenbergerjacalynp driversofhabitatqualityforareintroducedelkherd
AT kalbdavidm driversofhabitatqualityforareintroducedelkherd
AT abernathyheathern driversofhabitatqualityforareintroducedelkherd
AT thorneemilyd driversofhabitatqualityforareintroducedelkherd
AT fordwmark driversofhabitatqualityforareintroducedelkherd
AT cherrymichaelj driversofhabitatqualityforareintroducedelkherd