Cargando…
Stimulus‐dependent deliberation process in left‐ and right‐handers obtained via current source density analysis
The aim of the present study was to compare the activity patterns of young, healthy right‐ (RH, n = 25) and left‐handed (LH, n = 20) subjects in high‐density electroencephalograpic (EEG) recordings during a deliberation task. The deliberation task consisted of pressing one of two keys depending on a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9723376/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36471659 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15522 |
_version_ | 1784844161181024256 |
---|---|
author | Kolb, Florian P. Kutz, Dieter F. Werner, Jana Schönecker, Sonja Hürster, Walter Nida‐Rümelin, Julian |
author_facet | Kolb, Florian P. Kutz, Dieter F. Werner, Jana Schönecker, Sonja Hürster, Walter Nida‐Rümelin, Julian |
author_sort | Kolb, Florian P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of the present study was to compare the activity patterns of young, healthy right‐ (RH, n = 25) and left‐handed (LH, n = 20) subjects in high‐density electroencephalograpic (EEG) recordings during a deliberation task. The deliberation task consisted of pressing one of two keys depending on a color‐word Stroop task (Stroop, 1935) presented on a computer screen. Depending on the color shown and the meaning of the color word, participants responded with the index finger of the dominant or non‐dominant hand. This leads to different activities in the hemispheres depending on the acting hand and on subject's handedness. Presenting the word “black” in black color, subjects were not to press any key (no‐go‐trial). Prior to this, subjects were tested for simple motor tasks, during which they were informed about the motor action to be performed. The temporal activity patterns obtained from RH and LH were very similar in shape and constituent components. The comparison of the three types of trials lead to the assumption that the deliberation process is based on a two‐step decision: The first decision was characterized by the choice between move (match‐trials, mismatch‐trials) or not to move (no‐go‐trials). The second decision resulted in the final judgment of which index finger has to be used. The latter decision, in particular, can be tracked via the local spread of activity over the scalp. Our hypothesis is based on a comparison of activities and locations of RH and LH and yields some insights about processing a two‐step decision in a deliberation task. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9723376 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97233762022-12-07 Stimulus‐dependent deliberation process in left‐ and right‐handers obtained via current source density analysis Kolb, Florian P. Kutz, Dieter F. Werner, Jana Schönecker, Sonja Hürster, Walter Nida‐Rümelin, Julian Physiol Rep Original Articles The aim of the present study was to compare the activity patterns of young, healthy right‐ (RH, n = 25) and left‐handed (LH, n = 20) subjects in high‐density electroencephalograpic (EEG) recordings during a deliberation task. The deliberation task consisted of pressing one of two keys depending on a color‐word Stroop task (Stroop, 1935) presented on a computer screen. Depending on the color shown and the meaning of the color word, participants responded with the index finger of the dominant or non‐dominant hand. This leads to different activities in the hemispheres depending on the acting hand and on subject's handedness. Presenting the word “black” in black color, subjects were not to press any key (no‐go‐trial). Prior to this, subjects were tested for simple motor tasks, during which they were informed about the motor action to be performed. The temporal activity patterns obtained from RH and LH were very similar in shape and constituent components. The comparison of the three types of trials lead to the assumption that the deliberation process is based on a two‐step decision: The first decision was characterized by the choice between move (match‐trials, mismatch‐trials) or not to move (no‐go‐trials). The second decision resulted in the final judgment of which index finger has to be used. The latter decision, in particular, can be tracked via the local spread of activity over the scalp. Our hypothesis is based on a comparison of activities and locations of RH and LH and yields some insights about processing a two‐step decision in a deliberation task. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9723376/ /pubmed/36471659 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15522 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Kolb, Florian P. Kutz, Dieter F. Werner, Jana Schönecker, Sonja Hürster, Walter Nida‐Rümelin, Julian Stimulus‐dependent deliberation process in left‐ and right‐handers obtained via current source density analysis |
title | Stimulus‐dependent deliberation process in left‐ and right‐handers obtained via current source density analysis |
title_full | Stimulus‐dependent deliberation process in left‐ and right‐handers obtained via current source density analysis |
title_fullStr | Stimulus‐dependent deliberation process in left‐ and right‐handers obtained via current source density analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Stimulus‐dependent deliberation process in left‐ and right‐handers obtained via current source density analysis |
title_short | Stimulus‐dependent deliberation process in left‐ and right‐handers obtained via current source density analysis |
title_sort | stimulus‐dependent deliberation process in left‐ and right‐handers obtained via current source density analysis |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9723376/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36471659 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15522 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kolbflorianp stimulusdependentdeliberationprocessinleftandrighthandersobtainedviacurrentsourcedensityanalysis AT kutzdieterf stimulusdependentdeliberationprocessinleftandrighthandersobtainedviacurrentsourcedensityanalysis AT wernerjana stimulusdependentdeliberationprocessinleftandrighthandersobtainedviacurrentsourcedensityanalysis AT schoneckersonja stimulusdependentdeliberationprocessinleftandrighthandersobtainedviacurrentsourcedensityanalysis AT hursterwalter stimulusdependentdeliberationprocessinleftandrighthandersobtainedviacurrentsourcedensityanalysis AT nidarumelinjulian stimulusdependentdeliberationprocessinleftandrighthandersobtainedviacurrentsourcedensityanalysis |