Cargando…

Dosimetric and biological comparisons of single planning and double plannings for bilateral lung cancer SBRT planning based on the Cyber-Knife system

OBJECTIVE: The aim is to investigate the influence of single planning (Plan S) and double plannings (Plan D) on bilateral lung cancer stereotactic body radiation therapy planning from the perspective of dosimetry and biology respectively. Methods Cases with bilateral lung cancer patients who had und...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Xueling, Su, Huanfan, Wan, Fuying, Zhao, XianZhi, Cao, Tingting, Dai, Zhitao, Zhang, HuoJun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9723442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36483053
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1015999
_version_ 1784844177698193408
author Guo, Xueling
Su, Huanfan
Wan, Fuying
Zhao, XianZhi
Cao, Tingting
Dai, Zhitao
Zhang, HuoJun
author_facet Guo, Xueling
Su, Huanfan
Wan, Fuying
Zhao, XianZhi
Cao, Tingting
Dai, Zhitao
Zhang, HuoJun
author_sort Guo, Xueling
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim is to investigate the influence of single planning (Plan S) and double plannings (Plan D) on bilateral lung cancer stereotactic body radiation therapy planning from the perspective of dosimetry and biology respectively. Methods Cases with bilateral lung cancer patients who had undergone SBRT with the Cyber-Knife were enrolled, and a single planning and double plannings were designed in the Multiplan@4.2 treatment planning system equipped with the Cyber-Knife system. The single plan was to optimize the two target volumes in a separate plan, while the dual plan is to optimize two target volumes respectively in two separate plans, then perform dose superposition. Then based on the dosimetric results, the biological parameters were calculated. Thus the quality of SBRT plans for those bilateral lung cancer designed by the two methods were compared and evaluated according to the dosimetric and biological results. RESULTS: The dose distribution of both planning target volumes and surrounding organs at risk in Plan S and Plan D could meet the clinical prescription requirements. The target conformity index and the new conformity index of PTV were closer to 1 in the Double plannings, and the dose gradient GI in the Plan D was smaller than Plan S. For organs at risks, the doses received by the Plan D were relatively small. In terms of biological models, for the equivalent uniform dose of normal lung tissue, heart and esophagus, the Plan D was 6.51% (P=0.045), 19.8% (P=0.022), 27.08% (P>0.05) lower than Plan S respectively. The results showed that the equivalent uniform dose of normal tissue in the Plan D was lower relative to Plan S. CONCLUSIONS: Dosimetric and biological results show that both the use of Plan D have an advantage of protecting normal tissues, and it was suggested that to design double plannings for bilateral lung cancer stereotactic body radiation therapy planning based on Cyber-Knife in the clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9723442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97234422022-12-07 Dosimetric and biological comparisons of single planning and double plannings for bilateral lung cancer SBRT planning based on the Cyber-Knife system Guo, Xueling Su, Huanfan Wan, Fuying Zhao, XianZhi Cao, Tingting Dai, Zhitao Zhang, HuoJun Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVE: The aim is to investigate the influence of single planning (Plan S) and double plannings (Plan D) on bilateral lung cancer stereotactic body radiation therapy planning from the perspective of dosimetry and biology respectively. Methods Cases with bilateral lung cancer patients who had undergone SBRT with the Cyber-Knife were enrolled, and a single planning and double plannings were designed in the Multiplan@4.2 treatment planning system equipped with the Cyber-Knife system. The single plan was to optimize the two target volumes in a separate plan, while the dual plan is to optimize two target volumes respectively in two separate plans, then perform dose superposition. Then based on the dosimetric results, the biological parameters were calculated. Thus the quality of SBRT plans for those bilateral lung cancer designed by the two methods were compared and evaluated according to the dosimetric and biological results. RESULTS: The dose distribution of both planning target volumes and surrounding organs at risk in Plan S and Plan D could meet the clinical prescription requirements. The target conformity index and the new conformity index of PTV were closer to 1 in the Double plannings, and the dose gradient GI in the Plan D was smaller than Plan S. For organs at risks, the doses received by the Plan D were relatively small. In terms of biological models, for the equivalent uniform dose of normal lung tissue, heart and esophagus, the Plan D was 6.51% (P=0.045), 19.8% (P=0.022), 27.08% (P>0.05) lower than Plan S respectively. The results showed that the equivalent uniform dose of normal tissue in the Plan D was lower relative to Plan S. CONCLUSIONS: Dosimetric and biological results show that both the use of Plan D have an advantage of protecting normal tissues, and it was suggested that to design double plannings for bilateral lung cancer stereotactic body radiation therapy planning based on Cyber-Knife in the clinical practice. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9723442/ /pubmed/36483053 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1015999 Text en Copyright © 2022 Guo, Su, Wan, Zhao, Cao, Dai and Zhang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Guo, Xueling
Su, Huanfan
Wan, Fuying
Zhao, XianZhi
Cao, Tingting
Dai, Zhitao
Zhang, HuoJun
Dosimetric and biological comparisons of single planning and double plannings for bilateral lung cancer SBRT planning based on the Cyber-Knife system
title Dosimetric and biological comparisons of single planning and double plannings for bilateral lung cancer SBRT planning based on the Cyber-Knife system
title_full Dosimetric and biological comparisons of single planning and double plannings for bilateral lung cancer SBRT planning based on the Cyber-Knife system
title_fullStr Dosimetric and biological comparisons of single planning and double plannings for bilateral lung cancer SBRT planning based on the Cyber-Knife system
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric and biological comparisons of single planning and double plannings for bilateral lung cancer SBRT planning based on the Cyber-Knife system
title_short Dosimetric and biological comparisons of single planning and double plannings for bilateral lung cancer SBRT planning based on the Cyber-Knife system
title_sort dosimetric and biological comparisons of single planning and double plannings for bilateral lung cancer sbrt planning based on the cyber-knife system
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9723442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36483053
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1015999
work_keys_str_mv AT guoxueling dosimetricandbiologicalcomparisonsofsingleplanninganddoubleplanningsforbilaterallungcancersbrtplanningbasedonthecyberknifesystem
AT suhuanfan dosimetricandbiologicalcomparisonsofsingleplanninganddoubleplanningsforbilaterallungcancersbrtplanningbasedonthecyberknifesystem
AT wanfuying dosimetricandbiologicalcomparisonsofsingleplanninganddoubleplanningsforbilaterallungcancersbrtplanningbasedonthecyberknifesystem
AT zhaoxianzhi dosimetricandbiologicalcomparisonsofsingleplanninganddoubleplanningsforbilaterallungcancersbrtplanningbasedonthecyberknifesystem
AT caotingting dosimetricandbiologicalcomparisonsofsingleplanninganddoubleplanningsforbilaterallungcancersbrtplanningbasedonthecyberknifesystem
AT daizhitao dosimetricandbiologicalcomparisonsofsingleplanninganddoubleplanningsforbilaterallungcancersbrtplanningbasedonthecyberknifesystem
AT zhanghuojun dosimetricandbiologicalcomparisonsofsingleplanninganddoubleplanningsforbilaterallungcancersbrtplanningbasedonthecyberknifesystem