Cargando…
The impact of summer drought on peat soil microbiome structure and function-A multi-proxy-comparison
Different proxies for changes in structure and/or function of microbiomes have been developed, allowing assessing microbiome dynamics at multiple levels. However, the lack and differences in understanding the microbiome dynamics are due to the differences in the choice of proxies in different studie...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9723574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37938747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s43705-022-00164-x |
_version_ | 1784844212852752384 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Haitao Meister, Mareike Jensen, Corinna Kuss, Andreas W. Urich, Tim |
author_facet | Wang, Haitao Meister, Mareike Jensen, Corinna Kuss, Andreas W. Urich, Tim |
author_sort | Wang, Haitao |
collection | PubMed |
description | Different proxies for changes in structure and/or function of microbiomes have been developed, allowing assessing microbiome dynamics at multiple levels. However, the lack and differences in understanding the microbiome dynamics are due to the differences in the choice of proxies in different studies and the limitations of proxies themselves. Here, using both amplicon and metatranscriptomic sequencings, we compared four different proxies (16/18S rRNA genes, 16/18S rRNA transcripts, mRNA taxonomy and mRNA function) to reveal the impact of a severe summer drought in 2018 on prokaryotic and eukaryotic microbiome structures and functions in two rewetted fen peatlands in northern Germany. We found that both prokaryotic and eukaryotic microbiome compositions were significantly different between dry and wet months. Interestingly, mRNA proxies showed stronger and more significant impacts of drought for prokaryotes, while 18S rRNA transcript and mRNA taxonomy showed stronger drought impacts for eukaryotes. Accordingly, by comparing the accuracy of microbiome changes in predicting dry and wet months under different proxies, we found that mRNA proxies performed better for prokaryotes, while 18S rRNA transcript and mRNA taxonomy performed better for eukaryotes. In both cases, rRNA gene proxies showed much lower to the lowest accuracy, suggesting the drawback of DNA based approaches. To our knowledge, this is the first study comparing all these proxies to reveal the dynamics of both prokaryotic and eukaryotic microbiomes in soils. This study shows that microbiomes are sensitive to (extreme) weather changes in rewetted fens, and the associated microbial changes might contribute to ecological consequences. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9723574 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97235742023-01-04 The impact of summer drought on peat soil microbiome structure and function-A multi-proxy-comparison Wang, Haitao Meister, Mareike Jensen, Corinna Kuss, Andreas W. Urich, Tim ISME Commun Brief Communication Different proxies for changes in structure and/or function of microbiomes have been developed, allowing assessing microbiome dynamics at multiple levels. However, the lack and differences in understanding the microbiome dynamics are due to the differences in the choice of proxies in different studies and the limitations of proxies themselves. Here, using both amplicon and metatranscriptomic sequencings, we compared four different proxies (16/18S rRNA genes, 16/18S rRNA transcripts, mRNA taxonomy and mRNA function) to reveal the impact of a severe summer drought in 2018 on prokaryotic and eukaryotic microbiome structures and functions in two rewetted fen peatlands in northern Germany. We found that both prokaryotic and eukaryotic microbiome compositions were significantly different between dry and wet months. Interestingly, mRNA proxies showed stronger and more significant impacts of drought for prokaryotes, while 18S rRNA transcript and mRNA taxonomy showed stronger drought impacts for eukaryotes. Accordingly, by comparing the accuracy of microbiome changes in predicting dry and wet months under different proxies, we found that mRNA proxies performed better for prokaryotes, while 18S rRNA transcript and mRNA taxonomy performed better for eukaryotes. In both cases, rRNA gene proxies showed much lower to the lowest accuracy, suggesting the drawback of DNA based approaches. To our knowledge, this is the first study comparing all these proxies to reveal the dynamics of both prokaryotic and eukaryotic microbiomes in soils. This study shows that microbiomes are sensitive to (extreme) weather changes in rewetted fens, and the associated microbial changes might contribute to ecological consequences. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9723574/ /pubmed/37938747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s43705-022-00164-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Brief Communication Wang, Haitao Meister, Mareike Jensen, Corinna Kuss, Andreas W. Urich, Tim The impact of summer drought on peat soil microbiome structure and function-A multi-proxy-comparison |
title | The impact of summer drought on peat soil microbiome structure and function-A multi-proxy-comparison |
title_full | The impact of summer drought on peat soil microbiome structure and function-A multi-proxy-comparison |
title_fullStr | The impact of summer drought on peat soil microbiome structure and function-A multi-proxy-comparison |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of summer drought on peat soil microbiome structure and function-A multi-proxy-comparison |
title_short | The impact of summer drought on peat soil microbiome structure and function-A multi-proxy-comparison |
title_sort | impact of summer drought on peat soil microbiome structure and function-a multi-proxy-comparison |
topic | Brief Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9723574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37938747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s43705-022-00164-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wanghaitao theimpactofsummerdroughtonpeatsoilmicrobiomestructureandfunctionamultiproxycomparison AT meistermareike theimpactofsummerdroughtonpeatsoilmicrobiomestructureandfunctionamultiproxycomparison AT jensencorinna theimpactofsummerdroughtonpeatsoilmicrobiomestructureandfunctionamultiproxycomparison AT kussandreasw theimpactofsummerdroughtonpeatsoilmicrobiomestructureandfunctionamultiproxycomparison AT urichtim theimpactofsummerdroughtonpeatsoilmicrobiomestructureandfunctionamultiproxycomparison AT wanghaitao impactofsummerdroughtonpeatsoilmicrobiomestructureandfunctionamultiproxycomparison AT meistermareike impactofsummerdroughtonpeatsoilmicrobiomestructureandfunctionamultiproxycomparison AT jensencorinna impactofsummerdroughtonpeatsoilmicrobiomestructureandfunctionamultiproxycomparison AT kussandreasw impactofsummerdroughtonpeatsoilmicrobiomestructureandfunctionamultiproxycomparison AT urichtim impactofsummerdroughtonpeatsoilmicrobiomestructureandfunctionamultiproxycomparison |