Cargando…

The impact of summer drought on peat soil microbiome structure and function-A multi-proxy-comparison

Different proxies for changes in structure and/or function of microbiomes have been developed, allowing assessing microbiome dynamics at multiple levels. However, the lack and differences in understanding the microbiome dynamics are due to the differences in the choice of proxies in different studie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Haitao, Meister, Mareike, Jensen, Corinna, Kuss, Andreas W., Urich, Tim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9723574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37938747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s43705-022-00164-x
_version_ 1784844212852752384
author Wang, Haitao
Meister, Mareike
Jensen, Corinna
Kuss, Andreas W.
Urich, Tim
author_facet Wang, Haitao
Meister, Mareike
Jensen, Corinna
Kuss, Andreas W.
Urich, Tim
author_sort Wang, Haitao
collection PubMed
description Different proxies for changes in structure and/or function of microbiomes have been developed, allowing assessing microbiome dynamics at multiple levels. However, the lack and differences in understanding the microbiome dynamics are due to the differences in the choice of proxies in different studies and the limitations of proxies themselves. Here, using both amplicon and metatranscriptomic sequencings, we compared four different proxies (16/18S rRNA genes, 16/18S rRNA transcripts, mRNA taxonomy and mRNA function) to reveal the impact of a severe summer drought in 2018 on prokaryotic and eukaryotic microbiome structures and functions in two rewetted fen peatlands in northern Germany. We found that both prokaryotic and eukaryotic microbiome compositions were significantly different between dry and wet months. Interestingly, mRNA proxies showed stronger and more significant impacts of drought for prokaryotes, while 18S rRNA transcript and mRNA taxonomy showed stronger drought impacts for eukaryotes. Accordingly, by comparing the accuracy of microbiome changes in predicting dry and wet months under different proxies, we found that mRNA proxies performed better for prokaryotes, while 18S rRNA transcript and mRNA taxonomy performed better for eukaryotes. In both cases, rRNA gene proxies showed much lower to the lowest accuracy, suggesting the drawback of DNA based approaches. To our knowledge, this is the first study comparing all these proxies to reveal the dynamics of both prokaryotic and eukaryotic microbiomes in soils. This study shows that microbiomes are sensitive to (extreme) weather changes in rewetted fens, and the associated microbial changes might contribute to ecological consequences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9723574
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97235742023-01-04 The impact of summer drought on peat soil microbiome structure and function-A multi-proxy-comparison Wang, Haitao Meister, Mareike Jensen, Corinna Kuss, Andreas W. Urich, Tim ISME Commun Brief Communication Different proxies for changes in structure and/or function of microbiomes have been developed, allowing assessing microbiome dynamics at multiple levels. However, the lack and differences in understanding the microbiome dynamics are due to the differences in the choice of proxies in different studies and the limitations of proxies themselves. Here, using both amplicon and metatranscriptomic sequencings, we compared four different proxies (16/18S rRNA genes, 16/18S rRNA transcripts, mRNA taxonomy and mRNA function) to reveal the impact of a severe summer drought in 2018 on prokaryotic and eukaryotic microbiome structures and functions in two rewetted fen peatlands in northern Germany. We found that both prokaryotic and eukaryotic microbiome compositions were significantly different between dry and wet months. Interestingly, mRNA proxies showed stronger and more significant impacts of drought for prokaryotes, while 18S rRNA transcript and mRNA taxonomy showed stronger drought impacts for eukaryotes. Accordingly, by comparing the accuracy of microbiome changes in predicting dry and wet months under different proxies, we found that mRNA proxies performed better for prokaryotes, while 18S rRNA transcript and mRNA taxonomy performed better for eukaryotes. In both cases, rRNA gene proxies showed much lower to the lowest accuracy, suggesting the drawback of DNA based approaches. To our knowledge, this is the first study comparing all these proxies to reveal the dynamics of both prokaryotic and eukaryotic microbiomes in soils. This study shows that microbiomes are sensitive to (extreme) weather changes in rewetted fens, and the associated microbial changes might contribute to ecological consequences. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9723574/ /pubmed/37938747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s43705-022-00164-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Brief Communication
Wang, Haitao
Meister, Mareike
Jensen, Corinna
Kuss, Andreas W.
Urich, Tim
The impact of summer drought on peat soil microbiome structure and function-A multi-proxy-comparison
title The impact of summer drought on peat soil microbiome structure and function-A multi-proxy-comparison
title_full The impact of summer drought on peat soil microbiome structure and function-A multi-proxy-comparison
title_fullStr The impact of summer drought on peat soil microbiome structure and function-A multi-proxy-comparison
title_full_unstemmed The impact of summer drought on peat soil microbiome structure and function-A multi-proxy-comparison
title_short The impact of summer drought on peat soil microbiome structure and function-A multi-proxy-comparison
title_sort impact of summer drought on peat soil microbiome structure and function-a multi-proxy-comparison
topic Brief Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9723574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37938747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s43705-022-00164-x
work_keys_str_mv AT wanghaitao theimpactofsummerdroughtonpeatsoilmicrobiomestructureandfunctionamultiproxycomparison
AT meistermareike theimpactofsummerdroughtonpeatsoilmicrobiomestructureandfunctionamultiproxycomparison
AT jensencorinna theimpactofsummerdroughtonpeatsoilmicrobiomestructureandfunctionamultiproxycomparison
AT kussandreasw theimpactofsummerdroughtonpeatsoilmicrobiomestructureandfunctionamultiproxycomparison
AT urichtim theimpactofsummerdroughtonpeatsoilmicrobiomestructureandfunctionamultiproxycomparison
AT wanghaitao impactofsummerdroughtonpeatsoilmicrobiomestructureandfunctionamultiproxycomparison
AT meistermareike impactofsummerdroughtonpeatsoilmicrobiomestructureandfunctionamultiproxycomparison
AT jensencorinna impactofsummerdroughtonpeatsoilmicrobiomestructureandfunctionamultiproxycomparison
AT kussandreasw impactofsummerdroughtonpeatsoilmicrobiomestructureandfunctionamultiproxycomparison
AT urichtim impactofsummerdroughtonpeatsoilmicrobiomestructureandfunctionamultiproxycomparison