Cargando…

Farm-scale differentiation of active microbial colonizers

Microbial movement is important for replenishing lost soil microbial biodiversity and driving plant root colonization, particularly in managed agricultural soils, where microbial diversity and composition can be disrupted. Despite abundant survey-type microbiome data in soils, which are obscured by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: King, William L., Kaminsky, Laura M., Richards, Sarah C., Bradley, Brosi A., Kaye, Jason P., Bell, Terrence H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9723676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37938671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s43705-022-00120-9
_version_ 1784844238000750592
author King, William L.
Kaminsky, Laura M.
Richards, Sarah C.
Bradley, Brosi A.
Kaye, Jason P.
Bell, Terrence H.
author_facet King, William L.
Kaminsky, Laura M.
Richards, Sarah C.
Bradley, Brosi A.
Kaye, Jason P.
Bell, Terrence H.
author_sort King, William L.
collection PubMed
description Microbial movement is important for replenishing lost soil microbial biodiversity and driving plant root colonization, particularly in managed agricultural soils, where microbial diversity and composition can be disrupted. Despite abundant survey-type microbiome data in soils, which are obscured by legacy DNA and microbial dormancy, we do not know how active microbial pools are shaped by local soil properties, agricultural management, and at differing spatial scales. To determine how active microbial colonizers are shaped by spatial scale and environmental conditions, we deployed microbial traps (i.e. sterile soil enclosed by small pore membranes) containing two distinct soil types (forest; agricultural), in three neighboring locations, assessing colonization through 16S rRNA gene and fungal ITS amplicon sequencing. Location had a greater impact on fungal colonizers (R(2) = 0.31 vs. 0.26), while the soil type within the microbial traps influenced bacterial colonizers more (R(2) = 0.09 vs. 0.02). Bacterial colonizers showed greater colonization consistency (within-group similarity) among replicate communities. Relative to bacterial colonizers, fungal colonizers shared a greater compositional overlap to sequences from the surrounding local bulk soil (R(2) = 0.08 vs. 0.29), suggesting that these groups respond to distinct environmental constraints and that their in-field management may differ. Understanding how environmental constraints and spatial scales impact microbial recolonization dynamics and community assembly are essential for identifying how soil management can be used to shape agricultural microbiomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9723676
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97236762023-01-04 Farm-scale differentiation of active microbial colonizers King, William L. Kaminsky, Laura M. Richards, Sarah C. Bradley, Brosi A. Kaye, Jason P. Bell, Terrence H. ISME Commun Article Microbial movement is important for replenishing lost soil microbial biodiversity and driving plant root colonization, particularly in managed agricultural soils, where microbial diversity and composition can be disrupted. Despite abundant survey-type microbiome data in soils, which are obscured by legacy DNA and microbial dormancy, we do not know how active microbial pools are shaped by local soil properties, agricultural management, and at differing spatial scales. To determine how active microbial colonizers are shaped by spatial scale and environmental conditions, we deployed microbial traps (i.e. sterile soil enclosed by small pore membranes) containing two distinct soil types (forest; agricultural), in three neighboring locations, assessing colonization through 16S rRNA gene and fungal ITS amplicon sequencing. Location had a greater impact on fungal colonizers (R(2) = 0.31 vs. 0.26), while the soil type within the microbial traps influenced bacterial colonizers more (R(2) = 0.09 vs. 0.02). Bacterial colonizers showed greater colonization consistency (within-group similarity) among replicate communities. Relative to bacterial colonizers, fungal colonizers shared a greater compositional overlap to sequences from the surrounding local bulk soil (R(2) = 0.08 vs. 0.29), suggesting that these groups respond to distinct environmental constraints and that their in-field management may differ. Understanding how environmental constraints and spatial scales impact microbial recolonization dynamics and community assembly are essential for identifying how soil management can be used to shape agricultural microbiomes. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9723676/ /pubmed/37938671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s43705-022-00120-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
King, William L.
Kaminsky, Laura M.
Richards, Sarah C.
Bradley, Brosi A.
Kaye, Jason P.
Bell, Terrence H.
Farm-scale differentiation of active microbial colonizers
title Farm-scale differentiation of active microbial colonizers
title_full Farm-scale differentiation of active microbial colonizers
title_fullStr Farm-scale differentiation of active microbial colonizers
title_full_unstemmed Farm-scale differentiation of active microbial colonizers
title_short Farm-scale differentiation of active microbial colonizers
title_sort farm-scale differentiation of active microbial colonizers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9723676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37938671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s43705-022-00120-9
work_keys_str_mv AT kingwilliaml farmscaledifferentiationofactivemicrobialcolonizers
AT kaminskylauram farmscaledifferentiationofactivemicrobialcolonizers
AT richardssarahc farmscaledifferentiationofactivemicrobialcolonizers
AT bradleybrosia farmscaledifferentiationofactivemicrobialcolonizers
AT kayejasonp farmscaledifferentiationofactivemicrobialcolonizers
AT bellterrenceh farmscaledifferentiationofactivemicrobialcolonizers