Cargando…
Genetically modifying skin microbe to produce violacein and augmenting microbiome did not defend Panamanian golden frogs from disease
We designed two probiotic treatments to control chytridiomycosis caused by Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) on infected Panamanian golden frogs (Atelopus zeteki), a species that is thought to be extinct in the wild due to Bd. The first approach disrupted the existing skin microbe community with a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9723765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37938636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s43705-021-00044-w |
_version_ | 1784844260717101056 |
---|---|
author | Becker, Matthew H. Brophy, Jennifer A. N. Barrett, Kevin Bronikowski, Ed Evans, Matthew Glassey, Emerson Kaganer, Alyssa W. Klocke, Blake Lassiter, Elliot Meyer, Adam J. Muletz-Wolz, Carly R. Fleischer, Robert C. Voigt, Christopher A. Gratwicke, Brian |
author_facet | Becker, Matthew H. Brophy, Jennifer A. N. Barrett, Kevin Bronikowski, Ed Evans, Matthew Glassey, Emerson Kaganer, Alyssa W. Klocke, Blake Lassiter, Elliot Meyer, Adam J. Muletz-Wolz, Carly R. Fleischer, Robert C. Voigt, Christopher A. Gratwicke, Brian |
author_sort | Becker, Matthew H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We designed two probiotic treatments to control chytridiomycosis caused by Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) on infected Panamanian golden frogs (Atelopus zeteki), a species that is thought to be extinct in the wild due to Bd. The first approach disrupted the existing skin microbe community with antibiotics then exposed the frogs to a core golden frog skin microbe (Diaphorobacter sp.) that we genetically modified to produce high titers of violacein, a known antifungal compound. One day following probiotic treatment, the engineered Diaphorobacter and the violacein-producing pathway could be detected on the frogs but the treatment failed to improve frog survival when exposed to Bd. The second approach exposed frogs to the genetically modified bacterium mixed into a consortium with six other known anti-Bd bacteria isolated from captive A. zeteki, with no preliminary antibiotic treatment. The consortium treatment increased the frequency and abundance of three probiotic isolates (Janthinobacterium, Chryseobacterium, and Stenotrophomonas) and these persisted on the skin 4 weeks after probiotic treatment. There was a temporary increase in the frequency and abundance of three other probiotics isolates (Masillia, Serratia, and Pseudomonas) and the engineered Diaphorobacter isolate, but they subsequently disappeared from the skin. This treatment also failed to reduce frog mortality upon exposure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9723765 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97237652023-01-04 Genetically modifying skin microbe to produce violacein and augmenting microbiome did not defend Panamanian golden frogs from disease Becker, Matthew H. Brophy, Jennifer A. N. Barrett, Kevin Bronikowski, Ed Evans, Matthew Glassey, Emerson Kaganer, Alyssa W. Klocke, Blake Lassiter, Elliot Meyer, Adam J. Muletz-Wolz, Carly R. Fleischer, Robert C. Voigt, Christopher A. Gratwicke, Brian ISME Commun Article We designed two probiotic treatments to control chytridiomycosis caused by Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) on infected Panamanian golden frogs (Atelopus zeteki), a species that is thought to be extinct in the wild due to Bd. The first approach disrupted the existing skin microbe community with antibiotics then exposed the frogs to a core golden frog skin microbe (Diaphorobacter sp.) that we genetically modified to produce high titers of violacein, a known antifungal compound. One day following probiotic treatment, the engineered Diaphorobacter and the violacein-producing pathway could be detected on the frogs but the treatment failed to improve frog survival when exposed to Bd. The second approach exposed frogs to the genetically modified bacterium mixed into a consortium with six other known anti-Bd bacteria isolated from captive A. zeteki, with no preliminary antibiotic treatment. The consortium treatment increased the frequency and abundance of three probiotic isolates (Janthinobacterium, Chryseobacterium, and Stenotrophomonas) and these persisted on the skin 4 weeks after probiotic treatment. There was a temporary increase in the frequency and abundance of three other probiotics isolates (Masillia, Serratia, and Pseudomonas) and the engineered Diaphorobacter isolate, but they subsequently disappeared from the skin. This treatment also failed to reduce frog mortality upon exposure. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9723765/ /pubmed/37938636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s43705-021-00044-w Text en © This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2021, corrected publication 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Becker, Matthew H. Brophy, Jennifer A. N. Barrett, Kevin Bronikowski, Ed Evans, Matthew Glassey, Emerson Kaganer, Alyssa W. Klocke, Blake Lassiter, Elliot Meyer, Adam J. Muletz-Wolz, Carly R. Fleischer, Robert C. Voigt, Christopher A. Gratwicke, Brian Genetically modifying skin microbe to produce violacein and augmenting microbiome did not defend Panamanian golden frogs from disease |
title | Genetically modifying skin microbe to produce violacein and augmenting microbiome did not defend Panamanian golden frogs from disease |
title_full | Genetically modifying skin microbe to produce violacein and augmenting microbiome did not defend Panamanian golden frogs from disease |
title_fullStr | Genetically modifying skin microbe to produce violacein and augmenting microbiome did not defend Panamanian golden frogs from disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Genetically modifying skin microbe to produce violacein and augmenting microbiome did not defend Panamanian golden frogs from disease |
title_short | Genetically modifying skin microbe to produce violacein and augmenting microbiome did not defend Panamanian golden frogs from disease |
title_sort | genetically modifying skin microbe to produce violacein and augmenting microbiome did not defend panamanian golden frogs from disease |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9723765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37938636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s43705-021-00044-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beckermatthewh geneticallymodifyingskinmicrobetoproduceviolaceinandaugmentingmicrobiomedidnotdefendpanamaniangoldenfrogsfromdisease AT brophyjenniferan geneticallymodifyingskinmicrobetoproduceviolaceinandaugmentingmicrobiomedidnotdefendpanamaniangoldenfrogsfromdisease AT barrettkevin geneticallymodifyingskinmicrobetoproduceviolaceinandaugmentingmicrobiomedidnotdefendpanamaniangoldenfrogsfromdisease AT bronikowskied geneticallymodifyingskinmicrobetoproduceviolaceinandaugmentingmicrobiomedidnotdefendpanamaniangoldenfrogsfromdisease AT evansmatthew geneticallymodifyingskinmicrobetoproduceviolaceinandaugmentingmicrobiomedidnotdefendpanamaniangoldenfrogsfromdisease AT glasseyemerson geneticallymodifyingskinmicrobetoproduceviolaceinandaugmentingmicrobiomedidnotdefendpanamaniangoldenfrogsfromdisease AT kaganeralyssaw geneticallymodifyingskinmicrobetoproduceviolaceinandaugmentingmicrobiomedidnotdefendpanamaniangoldenfrogsfromdisease AT klockeblake geneticallymodifyingskinmicrobetoproduceviolaceinandaugmentingmicrobiomedidnotdefendpanamaniangoldenfrogsfromdisease AT lassiterelliot geneticallymodifyingskinmicrobetoproduceviolaceinandaugmentingmicrobiomedidnotdefendpanamaniangoldenfrogsfromdisease AT meyeradamj geneticallymodifyingskinmicrobetoproduceviolaceinandaugmentingmicrobiomedidnotdefendpanamaniangoldenfrogsfromdisease AT muletzwolzcarlyr geneticallymodifyingskinmicrobetoproduceviolaceinandaugmentingmicrobiomedidnotdefendpanamaniangoldenfrogsfromdisease AT fleischerrobertc geneticallymodifyingskinmicrobetoproduceviolaceinandaugmentingmicrobiomedidnotdefendpanamaniangoldenfrogsfromdisease AT voigtchristophera geneticallymodifyingskinmicrobetoproduceviolaceinandaugmentingmicrobiomedidnotdefendpanamaniangoldenfrogsfromdisease AT gratwickebrian geneticallymodifyingskinmicrobetoproduceviolaceinandaugmentingmicrobiomedidnotdefendpanamaniangoldenfrogsfromdisease |