Cargando…

Genetically modifying skin microbe to produce violacein and augmenting microbiome did not defend Panamanian golden frogs from disease

We designed two probiotic treatments to control chytridiomycosis caused by Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) on infected Panamanian golden frogs (Atelopus zeteki), a species that is thought to be extinct in the wild due to Bd. The first approach disrupted the existing skin microbe community with a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Becker, Matthew H., Brophy, Jennifer A. N., Barrett, Kevin, Bronikowski, Ed, Evans, Matthew, Glassey, Emerson, Kaganer, Alyssa W., Klocke, Blake, Lassiter, Elliot, Meyer, Adam J., Muletz-Wolz, Carly R., Fleischer, Robert C., Voigt, Christopher A., Gratwicke, Brian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9723765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37938636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s43705-021-00044-w
_version_ 1784844260717101056
author Becker, Matthew H.
Brophy, Jennifer A. N.
Barrett, Kevin
Bronikowski, Ed
Evans, Matthew
Glassey, Emerson
Kaganer, Alyssa W.
Klocke, Blake
Lassiter, Elliot
Meyer, Adam J.
Muletz-Wolz, Carly R.
Fleischer, Robert C.
Voigt, Christopher A.
Gratwicke, Brian
author_facet Becker, Matthew H.
Brophy, Jennifer A. N.
Barrett, Kevin
Bronikowski, Ed
Evans, Matthew
Glassey, Emerson
Kaganer, Alyssa W.
Klocke, Blake
Lassiter, Elliot
Meyer, Adam J.
Muletz-Wolz, Carly R.
Fleischer, Robert C.
Voigt, Christopher A.
Gratwicke, Brian
author_sort Becker, Matthew H.
collection PubMed
description We designed two probiotic treatments to control chytridiomycosis caused by Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) on infected Panamanian golden frogs (Atelopus zeteki), a species that is thought to be extinct in the wild due to Bd. The first approach disrupted the existing skin microbe community with antibiotics then exposed the frogs to a core golden frog skin microbe (Diaphorobacter sp.) that we genetically modified to produce high titers of violacein, a known antifungal compound. One day following probiotic treatment, the engineered Diaphorobacter and the violacein-producing pathway could be detected on the frogs but the treatment failed to improve frog survival when exposed to Bd. The second approach exposed frogs to the genetically modified bacterium mixed into a consortium with six other known anti-Bd bacteria isolated from captive A. zeteki, with no preliminary antibiotic treatment. The consortium treatment increased the frequency and abundance of three probiotic isolates (Janthinobacterium, Chryseobacterium, and Stenotrophomonas) and these persisted on the skin 4 weeks after probiotic treatment. There was a temporary increase in the frequency and abundance of three other probiotics isolates (Masillia, Serratia, and Pseudomonas) and the engineered Diaphorobacter isolate, but they subsequently disappeared from the skin. This treatment also failed to reduce frog mortality upon exposure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9723765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97237652023-01-04 Genetically modifying skin microbe to produce violacein and augmenting microbiome did not defend Panamanian golden frogs from disease Becker, Matthew H. Brophy, Jennifer A. N. Barrett, Kevin Bronikowski, Ed Evans, Matthew Glassey, Emerson Kaganer, Alyssa W. Klocke, Blake Lassiter, Elliot Meyer, Adam J. Muletz-Wolz, Carly R. Fleischer, Robert C. Voigt, Christopher A. Gratwicke, Brian ISME Commun Article We designed two probiotic treatments to control chytridiomycosis caused by Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) on infected Panamanian golden frogs (Atelopus zeteki), a species that is thought to be extinct in the wild due to Bd. The first approach disrupted the existing skin microbe community with antibiotics then exposed the frogs to a core golden frog skin microbe (Diaphorobacter sp.) that we genetically modified to produce high titers of violacein, a known antifungal compound. One day following probiotic treatment, the engineered Diaphorobacter and the violacein-producing pathway could be detected on the frogs but the treatment failed to improve frog survival when exposed to Bd. The second approach exposed frogs to the genetically modified bacterium mixed into a consortium with six other known anti-Bd bacteria isolated from captive A. zeteki, with no preliminary antibiotic treatment. The consortium treatment increased the frequency and abundance of three probiotic isolates (Janthinobacterium, Chryseobacterium, and Stenotrophomonas) and these persisted on the skin 4 weeks after probiotic treatment. There was a temporary increase in the frequency and abundance of three other probiotics isolates (Masillia, Serratia, and Pseudomonas) and the engineered Diaphorobacter isolate, but they subsequently disappeared from the skin. This treatment also failed to reduce frog mortality upon exposure. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9723765/ /pubmed/37938636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s43705-021-00044-w Text en © This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2021, corrected publication 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Becker, Matthew H.
Brophy, Jennifer A. N.
Barrett, Kevin
Bronikowski, Ed
Evans, Matthew
Glassey, Emerson
Kaganer, Alyssa W.
Klocke, Blake
Lassiter, Elliot
Meyer, Adam J.
Muletz-Wolz, Carly R.
Fleischer, Robert C.
Voigt, Christopher A.
Gratwicke, Brian
Genetically modifying skin microbe to produce violacein and augmenting microbiome did not defend Panamanian golden frogs from disease
title Genetically modifying skin microbe to produce violacein and augmenting microbiome did not defend Panamanian golden frogs from disease
title_full Genetically modifying skin microbe to produce violacein and augmenting microbiome did not defend Panamanian golden frogs from disease
title_fullStr Genetically modifying skin microbe to produce violacein and augmenting microbiome did not defend Panamanian golden frogs from disease
title_full_unstemmed Genetically modifying skin microbe to produce violacein and augmenting microbiome did not defend Panamanian golden frogs from disease
title_short Genetically modifying skin microbe to produce violacein and augmenting microbiome did not defend Panamanian golden frogs from disease
title_sort genetically modifying skin microbe to produce violacein and augmenting microbiome did not defend panamanian golden frogs from disease
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9723765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37938636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s43705-021-00044-w
work_keys_str_mv AT beckermatthewh geneticallymodifyingskinmicrobetoproduceviolaceinandaugmentingmicrobiomedidnotdefendpanamaniangoldenfrogsfromdisease
AT brophyjenniferan geneticallymodifyingskinmicrobetoproduceviolaceinandaugmentingmicrobiomedidnotdefendpanamaniangoldenfrogsfromdisease
AT barrettkevin geneticallymodifyingskinmicrobetoproduceviolaceinandaugmentingmicrobiomedidnotdefendpanamaniangoldenfrogsfromdisease
AT bronikowskied geneticallymodifyingskinmicrobetoproduceviolaceinandaugmentingmicrobiomedidnotdefendpanamaniangoldenfrogsfromdisease
AT evansmatthew geneticallymodifyingskinmicrobetoproduceviolaceinandaugmentingmicrobiomedidnotdefendpanamaniangoldenfrogsfromdisease
AT glasseyemerson geneticallymodifyingskinmicrobetoproduceviolaceinandaugmentingmicrobiomedidnotdefendpanamaniangoldenfrogsfromdisease
AT kaganeralyssaw geneticallymodifyingskinmicrobetoproduceviolaceinandaugmentingmicrobiomedidnotdefendpanamaniangoldenfrogsfromdisease
AT klockeblake geneticallymodifyingskinmicrobetoproduceviolaceinandaugmentingmicrobiomedidnotdefendpanamaniangoldenfrogsfromdisease
AT lassiterelliot geneticallymodifyingskinmicrobetoproduceviolaceinandaugmentingmicrobiomedidnotdefendpanamaniangoldenfrogsfromdisease
AT meyeradamj geneticallymodifyingskinmicrobetoproduceviolaceinandaugmentingmicrobiomedidnotdefendpanamaniangoldenfrogsfromdisease
AT muletzwolzcarlyr geneticallymodifyingskinmicrobetoproduceviolaceinandaugmentingmicrobiomedidnotdefendpanamaniangoldenfrogsfromdisease
AT fleischerrobertc geneticallymodifyingskinmicrobetoproduceviolaceinandaugmentingmicrobiomedidnotdefendpanamaniangoldenfrogsfromdisease
AT voigtchristophera geneticallymodifyingskinmicrobetoproduceviolaceinandaugmentingmicrobiomedidnotdefendpanamaniangoldenfrogsfromdisease
AT gratwickebrian geneticallymodifyingskinmicrobetoproduceviolaceinandaugmentingmicrobiomedidnotdefendpanamaniangoldenfrogsfromdisease