Cargando…

Motivators and deterrents for early career female doctors applying to surgical training programmes in the UK National Health Service: a mixed-methods study

OBJECTIVES: To perform a mixed-methods study identifying motivators and deterrents to female doctors interested in core surgical training (CST). To provide tangible implementations based on the findings. DESIGN: This study used quantitative (questionnaires) and qualitative (semistructured interviews...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruparell, Kajal, Barve, Rajas, Tas, Rukiye N, Chen, Sihan, Mclaughlin, Reed, Ravendren, Andrew, Gupte, Chinmay M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9723904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36456020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055652
_version_ 1784844289574961152
author Ruparell, Kajal
Barve, Rajas
Tas, Rukiye N
Chen, Sihan
Mclaughlin, Reed
Ravendren, Andrew
Gupte, Chinmay M
author_facet Ruparell, Kajal
Barve, Rajas
Tas, Rukiye N
Chen, Sihan
Mclaughlin, Reed
Ravendren, Andrew
Gupte, Chinmay M
author_sort Ruparell, Kajal
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To perform a mixed-methods study identifying motivators and deterrents to female doctors interested in core surgical training (CST). To provide tangible implementations based on the findings. DESIGN: This study used quantitative (questionnaires) and qualitative (semistructured interviews (SSIs)) analyses. Participants completed online questionnaires on Qualtrics and SSIs were conducted remotely on Microsoft Teams. Questions were derived from previous studies and a novel term, the gender impact rating (GIR), was coined to assess the impact of gender on opportunities available during CST application. SETTING: Participants were working in the UK National Health Service and data collected from December 2020 to January 2021. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 100 female surgical trainees in the UK ranging from Foundation Year 2 to Core Training Year 2. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants ranked factors by their influence on their CST application. Of the 100 trainees, 21 were randomly selected for an SSI to explore their questionnaire responses. Statistical analyses were performed using MATLAB and SPSS, alongside a thematic analysis of the interviews. RESULTS: A total of 44 out of 100 questionnaire respondents ranked early exposure to surgery as the most influential motivator, while 43% selected work-life balance as the greatest deterrent and 33% suggested mentoring schemes to encourage women to apply to CST. The median GIR was 3 out of 5, indicating a moderate perceived impact of gender on opportunities available during CST application. Qualitative analysis found four overarching themes: institutional factors (including mentorship schemes), organisational culture (including active engagement), social factors and personal factors. CONCLUSION: Thematic analysis suggested that seniors involving women in theatre and a supportive work environment would encourage entry of more female surgeons. Therefore, the proposed implementations are the active engagement of women in theatre and destigmatising less than full-time training. Further research into ethnicity and personality on motivations to enter surgery is advised.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9723904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97239042022-12-07 Motivators and deterrents for early career female doctors applying to surgical training programmes in the UK National Health Service: a mixed-methods study Ruparell, Kajal Barve, Rajas Tas, Rukiye N Chen, Sihan Mclaughlin, Reed Ravendren, Andrew Gupte, Chinmay M BMJ Open Surgery OBJECTIVES: To perform a mixed-methods study identifying motivators and deterrents to female doctors interested in core surgical training (CST). To provide tangible implementations based on the findings. DESIGN: This study used quantitative (questionnaires) and qualitative (semistructured interviews (SSIs)) analyses. Participants completed online questionnaires on Qualtrics and SSIs were conducted remotely on Microsoft Teams. Questions were derived from previous studies and a novel term, the gender impact rating (GIR), was coined to assess the impact of gender on opportunities available during CST application. SETTING: Participants were working in the UK National Health Service and data collected from December 2020 to January 2021. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 100 female surgical trainees in the UK ranging from Foundation Year 2 to Core Training Year 2. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants ranked factors by their influence on their CST application. Of the 100 trainees, 21 were randomly selected for an SSI to explore their questionnaire responses. Statistical analyses were performed using MATLAB and SPSS, alongside a thematic analysis of the interviews. RESULTS: A total of 44 out of 100 questionnaire respondents ranked early exposure to surgery as the most influential motivator, while 43% selected work-life balance as the greatest deterrent and 33% suggested mentoring schemes to encourage women to apply to CST. The median GIR was 3 out of 5, indicating a moderate perceived impact of gender on opportunities available during CST application. Qualitative analysis found four overarching themes: institutional factors (including mentorship schemes), organisational culture (including active engagement), social factors and personal factors. CONCLUSION: Thematic analysis suggested that seniors involving women in theatre and a supportive work environment would encourage entry of more female surgeons. Therefore, the proposed implementations are the active engagement of women in theatre and destigmatising less than full-time training. Further research into ethnicity and personality on motivations to enter surgery is advised. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9723904/ /pubmed/36456020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055652 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Surgery
Ruparell, Kajal
Barve, Rajas
Tas, Rukiye N
Chen, Sihan
Mclaughlin, Reed
Ravendren, Andrew
Gupte, Chinmay M
Motivators and deterrents for early career female doctors applying to surgical training programmes in the UK National Health Service: a mixed-methods study
title Motivators and deterrents for early career female doctors applying to surgical training programmes in the UK National Health Service: a mixed-methods study
title_full Motivators and deterrents for early career female doctors applying to surgical training programmes in the UK National Health Service: a mixed-methods study
title_fullStr Motivators and deterrents for early career female doctors applying to surgical training programmes in the UK National Health Service: a mixed-methods study
title_full_unstemmed Motivators and deterrents for early career female doctors applying to surgical training programmes in the UK National Health Service: a mixed-methods study
title_short Motivators and deterrents for early career female doctors applying to surgical training programmes in the UK National Health Service: a mixed-methods study
title_sort motivators and deterrents for early career female doctors applying to surgical training programmes in the uk national health service: a mixed-methods study
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9723904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36456020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055652
work_keys_str_mv AT ruparellkajal motivatorsanddeterrentsforearlycareerfemaledoctorsapplyingtosurgicaltrainingprogrammesintheuknationalhealthserviceamixedmethodsstudy
AT barverajas motivatorsanddeterrentsforearlycareerfemaledoctorsapplyingtosurgicaltrainingprogrammesintheuknationalhealthserviceamixedmethodsstudy
AT tasrukiyen motivatorsanddeterrentsforearlycareerfemaledoctorsapplyingtosurgicaltrainingprogrammesintheuknationalhealthserviceamixedmethodsstudy
AT chensihan motivatorsanddeterrentsforearlycareerfemaledoctorsapplyingtosurgicaltrainingprogrammesintheuknationalhealthserviceamixedmethodsstudy
AT mclaughlinreed motivatorsanddeterrentsforearlycareerfemaledoctorsapplyingtosurgicaltrainingprogrammesintheuknationalhealthserviceamixedmethodsstudy
AT ravendrenandrew motivatorsanddeterrentsforearlycareerfemaledoctorsapplyingtosurgicaltrainingprogrammesintheuknationalhealthserviceamixedmethodsstudy
AT guptechinmaym motivatorsanddeterrentsforearlycareerfemaledoctorsapplyingtosurgicaltrainingprogrammesintheuknationalhealthserviceamixedmethodsstudy