Cargando…

Pharmaceutical brochures in Lebanon: do they meet WHO recommendations?

BACKGROUND: Drug promoting brochures can influence physicians prescription patterns. The validity of the info presented in these brochures is of major importance. World Health Organization (WHO) issued criteria to guarantee validity, equity and ethical presentation of data in medical brochures. This...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fadoul, Yara, Haddad, Chadia, Habib, Jad, Zoghbi, Marouan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9724251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36474170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01930-5
_version_ 1784844369198579712
author Fadoul, Yara
Haddad, Chadia
Habib, Jad
Zoghbi, Marouan
author_facet Fadoul, Yara
Haddad, Chadia
Habib, Jad
Zoghbi, Marouan
author_sort Fadoul, Yara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Drug promoting brochures can influence physicians prescription patterns. The validity of the info presented in these brochures is of major importance. World Health Organization (WHO) issued criteria to guarantee validity, equity and ethical presentation of data in medical brochures. This study aims to evaluate the quality and the validity of information presented in the pharmaceutical brochures distributed among family physicians in Lebanon. METHODS: Pharmaceutical brochures were randomly collected at the family medicine center in Hôtel Dieu de France hospital in Beirut - Lebanon. These brochures were evaluated in reference to the WHO ethical criteria for medicinal drug promotion and on guidelines for quality assurance of the graphs, references, texts and illustrations. RESULTS: Among the 60 brochures collected, only 4 fulfilled all the WHO ethical criteria, and 24 presented less than half the required criteria. Information concerning the drug safety are the least mentioned. Only 11.8% of the presented graphs are based on studies of high methodological level. Half of the brochures presented necessary information to identify studies references which are not always retrievable. Texts present mainly brand names instead of generic names and emphasize on information reflecting the drug efficacy. CONCLUSION: The pharmaceutical brochures in this study presented incomplete or invalid information. Prescribing physicians should be aware of the claims found in the brochures distributed by pharmaceutical companies and should be familiar with the principles of the evidence-based medicine to be able to critically appraise the validity of the reference studies and avoid the pitfalls in graphs reading. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-022-01930-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9724251
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97242512022-12-07 Pharmaceutical brochures in Lebanon: do they meet WHO recommendations? Fadoul, Yara Haddad, Chadia Habib, Jad Zoghbi, Marouan BMC Prim Care Research BACKGROUND: Drug promoting brochures can influence physicians prescription patterns. The validity of the info presented in these brochures is of major importance. World Health Organization (WHO) issued criteria to guarantee validity, equity and ethical presentation of data in medical brochures. This study aims to evaluate the quality and the validity of information presented in the pharmaceutical brochures distributed among family physicians in Lebanon. METHODS: Pharmaceutical brochures were randomly collected at the family medicine center in Hôtel Dieu de France hospital in Beirut - Lebanon. These brochures were evaluated in reference to the WHO ethical criteria for medicinal drug promotion and on guidelines for quality assurance of the graphs, references, texts and illustrations. RESULTS: Among the 60 brochures collected, only 4 fulfilled all the WHO ethical criteria, and 24 presented less than half the required criteria. Information concerning the drug safety are the least mentioned. Only 11.8% of the presented graphs are based on studies of high methodological level. Half of the brochures presented necessary information to identify studies references which are not always retrievable. Texts present mainly brand names instead of generic names and emphasize on information reflecting the drug efficacy. CONCLUSION: The pharmaceutical brochures in this study presented incomplete or invalid information. Prescribing physicians should be aware of the claims found in the brochures distributed by pharmaceutical companies and should be familiar with the principles of the evidence-based medicine to be able to critically appraise the validity of the reference studies and avoid the pitfalls in graphs reading. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-022-01930-5. BioMed Central 2022-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9724251/ /pubmed/36474170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01930-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Fadoul, Yara
Haddad, Chadia
Habib, Jad
Zoghbi, Marouan
Pharmaceutical brochures in Lebanon: do they meet WHO recommendations?
title Pharmaceutical brochures in Lebanon: do they meet WHO recommendations?
title_full Pharmaceutical brochures in Lebanon: do they meet WHO recommendations?
title_fullStr Pharmaceutical brochures in Lebanon: do they meet WHO recommendations?
title_full_unstemmed Pharmaceutical brochures in Lebanon: do they meet WHO recommendations?
title_short Pharmaceutical brochures in Lebanon: do they meet WHO recommendations?
title_sort pharmaceutical brochures in lebanon: do they meet who recommendations?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9724251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36474170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01930-5
work_keys_str_mv AT fadoulyara pharmaceuticalbrochuresinlebanondotheymeetwhorecommendations
AT haddadchadia pharmaceuticalbrochuresinlebanondotheymeetwhorecommendations
AT habibjad pharmaceuticalbrochuresinlebanondotheymeetwhorecommendations
AT zoghbimarouan pharmaceuticalbrochuresinlebanondotheymeetwhorecommendations