Cargando…

Physical activity in pregnancy: a mixed methods process evaluation of the FitMum randomised controlled trial interventions

BACKGROUND: Physical activity (PA) at moderate intensity is recommended for healthy pregnant women. The three-arm FitMum randomised controlled trial showed that it was possible to increase PA level during pregnancy with structured supervised exercise training (EXE) compared to standard care. Motivat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Knudsen, Signe de Place, Roland, Caroline Borup, Alomairah, Saud Abdulaziz, Jessen, Anne Dsane, Molsted, Stig, Clausen, Tine D., Løkkegaard, Ellen, Stallknecht, Bente, Bønnelycke, Julie, Bendix, Jane M., Maindal, Helle Terkildsen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9724308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36474181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14717-1
_version_ 1784844384450117632
author Knudsen, Signe de Place
Roland, Caroline Borup
Alomairah, Saud Abdulaziz
Jessen, Anne Dsane
Molsted, Stig
Clausen, Tine D.
Løkkegaard, Ellen
Stallknecht, Bente
Bønnelycke, Julie
Bendix, Jane M.
Maindal, Helle Terkildsen
author_facet Knudsen, Signe de Place
Roland, Caroline Borup
Alomairah, Saud Abdulaziz
Jessen, Anne Dsane
Molsted, Stig
Clausen, Tine D.
Løkkegaard, Ellen
Stallknecht, Bente
Bønnelycke, Julie
Bendix, Jane M.
Maindal, Helle Terkildsen
author_sort Knudsen, Signe de Place
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Physical activity (PA) at moderate intensity is recommended for healthy pregnant women. The three-arm FitMum randomised controlled trial showed that it was possible to increase PA level during pregnancy with structured supervised exercise training (EXE) compared to standard care. Motivational counselling on PA (MOT) did not increase PA. This process evaluation aims to understand the implementation and mechanisms of impact of EXE and MOT. METHODS: A mixed methods process evaluation was conducted using the UK Medical Research Council’s process evaluation framework by assessing implementation (reach, fidelity, and dose) and mechanisms of impact of the two interventions provided to pregnant women in FitMum. Data was collected both quantitatively (n = 220) and qualitatively (n = 20). RESULTS: The FitMum trial reached educated pregnant women (80% having an educational level ≥ bachelor’s degree) with high autonomy of everyday life. Most participants (58%) were recruited at their first-trimester ultrasonic scan. Reasons to participate were personal (91%) and altruistic (56%). The intervention dose was delivered as intended with high fidelity in the original physical intervention setup and in the altered online setup during the COVID-19 restrictions. A low dose received in EXE (1.3 [95% CI, 1.1; 1.5] sessions/week) was partly explained by the pre-scheduled EXE sessions favouring participants with a flexible everyday life and a supportive social network. Dose received in EXE increased during online intervention delivery. Participants in MOT received 5.2 [4.7; 5.7] of 7 sessions. Mechanisms of impact comprised a perception of intervention commitment among participants in EXE due to the scheduled EXE sessions, whereas participants in MOT considered themselves as PA self-determined. PA was considered as constrained activities in EXE and included in daily activities in MOT. CONCLUSION: The FitMum interventions was delivered with high fidelity. During COVID-19, the dose received in EXE increased compared to the previous physical setup. Mechanisms of impact as commitment, perception of empowerment and perception of PA as well as the paradox between prioritising PA and family and the need of a flexible everyday life need to be considered when offering pregnant women PA interventions. Future interventions should consider a combination of physical and online exercise training for pregnant women. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-14717-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9724308
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97243082022-12-07 Physical activity in pregnancy: a mixed methods process evaluation of the FitMum randomised controlled trial interventions Knudsen, Signe de Place Roland, Caroline Borup Alomairah, Saud Abdulaziz Jessen, Anne Dsane Molsted, Stig Clausen, Tine D. Løkkegaard, Ellen Stallknecht, Bente Bønnelycke, Julie Bendix, Jane M. Maindal, Helle Terkildsen BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Physical activity (PA) at moderate intensity is recommended for healthy pregnant women. The three-arm FitMum randomised controlled trial showed that it was possible to increase PA level during pregnancy with structured supervised exercise training (EXE) compared to standard care. Motivational counselling on PA (MOT) did not increase PA. This process evaluation aims to understand the implementation and mechanisms of impact of EXE and MOT. METHODS: A mixed methods process evaluation was conducted using the UK Medical Research Council’s process evaluation framework by assessing implementation (reach, fidelity, and dose) and mechanisms of impact of the two interventions provided to pregnant women in FitMum. Data was collected both quantitatively (n = 220) and qualitatively (n = 20). RESULTS: The FitMum trial reached educated pregnant women (80% having an educational level ≥ bachelor’s degree) with high autonomy of everyday life. Most participants (58%) were recruited at their first-trimester ultrasonic scan. Reasons to participate were personal (91%) and altruistic (56%). The intervention dose was delivered as intended with high fidelity in the original physical intervention setup and in the altered online setup during the COVID-19 restrictions. A low dose received in EXE (1.3 [95% CI, 1.1; 1.5] sessions/week) was partly explained by the pre-scheduled EXE sessions favouring participants with a flexible everyday life and a supportive social network. Dose received in EXE increased during online intervention delivery. Participants in MOT received 5.2 [4.7; 5.7] of 7 sessions. Mechanisms of impact comprised a perception of intervention commitment among participants in EXE due to the scheduled EXE sessions, whereas participants in MOT considered themselves as PA self-determined. PA was considered as constrained activities in EXE and included in daily activities in MOT. CONCLUSION: The FitMum interventions was delivered with high fidelity. During COVID-19, the dose received in EXE increased compared to the previous physical setup. Mechanisms of impact as commitment, perception of empowerment and perception of PA as well as the paradox between prioritising PA and family and the need of a flexible everyday life need to be considered when offering pregnant women PA interventions. Future interventions should consider a combination of physical and online exercise training for pregnant women. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-14717-1. BioMed Central 2022-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9724308/ /pubmed/36474181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14717-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Knudsen, Signe de Place
Roland, Caroline Borup
Alomairah, Saud Abdulaziz
Jessen, Anne Dsane
Molsted, Stig
Clausen, Tine D.
Løkkegaard, Ellen
Stallknecht, Bente
Bønnelycke, Julie
Bendix, Jane M.
Maindal, Helle Terkildsen
Physical activity in pregnancy: a mixed methods process evaluation of the FitMum randomised controlled trial interventions
title Physical activity in pregnancy: a mixed methods process evaluation of the FitMum randomised controlled trial interventions
title_full Physical activity in pregnancy: a mixed methods process evaluation of the FitMum randomised controlled trial interventions
title_fullStr Physical activity in pregnancy: a mixed methods process evaluation of the FitMum randomised controlled trial interventions
title_full_unstemmed Physical activity in pregnancy: a mixed methods process evaluation of the FitMum randomised controlled trial interventions
title_short Physical activity in pregnancy: a mixed methods process evaluation of the FitMum randomised controlled trial interventions
title_sort physical activity in pregnancy: a mixed methods process evaluation of the fitmum randomised controlled trial interventions
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9724308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36474181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14717-1
work_keys_str_mv AT knudsensignedeplace physicalactivityinpregnancyamixedmethodsprocessevaluationofthefitmumrandomisedcontrolledtrialinterventions
AT rolandcarolineborup physicalactivityinpregnancyamixedmethodsprocessevaluationofthefitmumrandomisedcontrolledtrialinterventions
AT alomairahsaudabdulaziz physicalactivityinpregnancyamixedmethodsprocessevaluationofthefitmumrandomisedcontrolledtrialinterventions
AT jessenannedsane physicalactivityinpregnancyamixedmethodsprocessevaluationofthefitmumrandomisedcontrolledtrialinterventions
AT molstedstig physicalactivityinpregnancyamixedmethodsprocessevaluationofthefitmumrandomisedcontrolledtrialinterventions
AT clausentined physicalactivityinpregnancyamixedmethodsprocessevaluationofthefitmumrandomisedcontrolledtrialinterventions
AT løkkegaardellen physicalactivityinpregnancyamixedmethodsprocessevaluationofthefitmumrandomisedcontrolledtrialinterventions
AT stallknechtbente physicalactivityinpregnancyamixedmethodsprocessevaluationofthefitmumrandomisedcontrolledtrialinterventions
AT bønnelyckejulie physicalactivityinpregnancyamixedmethodsprocessevaluationofthefitmumrandomisedcontrolledtrialinterventions
AT bendixjanem physicalactivityinpregnancyamixedmethodsprocessevaluationofthefitmumrandomisedcontrolledtrialinterventions
AT maindalhelleterkildsen physicalactivityinpregnancyamixedmethodsprocessevaluationofthefitmumrandomisedcontrolledtrialinterventions