Cargando…
Impact of an intensive facility-community case management intervention on 6-month HIV outcomes among select key and priority populations in Uganda
INTRODUCTION: Key and priority populations (with risk behaviours and health inequities) are disproportionately affected by HIV in Uganda. We evaluated the impact of an intensive case management intervention on HIV treatment outcomes in Kalangala District, predominantly inhabited by fisher folk and f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9724352/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36471321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12981-022-00486-9 |
_version_ | 1784844395518885888 |
---|---|
author | Meya, David B. Kiragga, Agnes N. Nalintya, Elizabeth Banturaki, Grace Akullo, Joan Kalyesubula, Phillip Sessazi, Patrick Bitakalamire, Hillary Kabanda, Joseph Kalamya, Julius N. Namale, Alice Bateganya, Moses Kagaayi, Joseph Gutreuter, Steve Adler, Michelle R. Mitruka, Kiren |
author_facet | Meya, David B. Kiragga, Agnes N. Nalintya, Elizabeth Banturaki, Grace Akullo, Joan Kalyesubula, Phillip Sessazi, Patrick Bitakalamire, Hillary Kabanda, Joseph Kalamya, Julius N. Namale, Alice Bateganya, Moses Kagaayi, Joseph Gutreuter, Steve Adler, Michelle R. Mitruka, Kiren |
author_sort | Meya, David B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Key and priority populations (with risk behaviours and health inequities) are disproportionately affected by HIV in Uganda. We evaluated the impact of an intensive case management intervention on HIV treatment outcomes in Kalangala District, predominantly inhabited by fisher folk and female sex workers. METHODS: This quasi-experimental pre-post intervention evaluation included antiretroviral therapy naïve adults aged ≥ 18 years from six health facilities in the pre-intervention (Jan 1, 2017–December 31, 2017) and intervention phase (June 13, 2018–June 30, 2019). The primary outcomes were 6-month retention and viral suppression (VS) before and after implementation of the intervention involving facility and community case managers who supported participants through at least the first three months of ART. We used descriptive statistics to compared the characteristics, overall outcomes (i.e., retention, lost to follow up, died), and VS of participants by phase, and used mixed-effects logistic regression models to determine factors associated with 6-month retention in care. Marginal (averaging over facilities) probabilities of retention were computed from the final multivariable model. RESULTS: We enrolled 606 and 405 participants in the pre-intervention and intervention phases respectively. Approximately 75% of participants were aged 25–44 years, with similar age and gender distributions among phases. Approximately 46% of participants in the intervention were fisher folk and 9% were female sex workers. The adjusted probability of 6-month retention was higher in the intervention phase, 0.83 (95% CI: 0.77–0.90) versus pre-intervention phase, 0.73 (95% CI: 0.69–0.77, p = 0.03). The retention probability increased from 0.59 (0.49–0.68) to 0.73 (0.59–0.86), p = 0.03 among participants aged 18–24 years, and from 0.75 (0.71–0.78) to 0.85 (0.78–0.91), p = 0.03 among participants aged ≥ 25 years. VS (< 1,000 copies/mL) was approximately 87% in both phases. CONCLUSIONS: After implementation of the case management intervention, we observed significant improvement in 6-month retention in all age groups of a highly mobile population of predominantly fisher folk. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9724352 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97243522022-12-07 Impact of an intensive facility-community case management intervention on 6-month HIV outcomes among select key and priority populations in Uganda Meya, David B. Kiragga, Agnes N. Nalintya, Elizabeth Banturaki, Grace Akullo, Joan Kalyesubula, Phillip Sessazi, Patrick Bitakalamire, Hillary Kabanda, Joseph Kalamya, Julius N. Namale, Alice Bateganya, Moses Kagaayi, Joseph Gutreuter, Steve Adler, Michelle R. Mitruka, Kiren AIDS Res Ther Research INTRODUCTION: Key and priority populations (with risk behaviours and health inequities) are disproportionately affected by HIV in Uganda. We evaluated the impact of an intensive case management intervention on HIV treatment outcomes in Kalangala District, predominantly inhabited by fisher folk and female sex workers. METHODS: This quasi-experimental pre-post intervention evaluation included antiretroviral therapy naïve adults aged ≥ 18 years from six health facilities in the pre-intervention (Jan 1, 2017–December 31, 2017) and intervention phase (June 13, 2018–June 30, 2019). The primary outcomes were 6-month retention and viral suppression (VS) before and after implementation of the intervention involving facility and community case managers who supported participants through at least the first three months of ART. We used descriptive statistics to compared the characteristics, overall outcomes (i.e., retention, lost to follow up, died), and VS of participants by phase, and used mixed-effects logistic regression models to determine factors associated with 6-month retention in care. Marginal (averaging over facilities) probabilities of retention were computed from the final multivariable model. RESULTS: We enrolled 606 and 405 participants in the pre-intervention and intervention phases respectively. Approximately 75% of participants were aged 25–44 years, with similar age and gender distributions among phases. Approximately 46% of participants in the intervention were fisher folk and 9% were female sex workers. The adjusted probability of 6-month retention was higher in the intervention phase, 0.83 (95% CI: 0.77–0.90) versus pre-intervention phase, 0.73 (95% CI: 0.69–0.77, p = 0.03). The retention probability increased from 0.59 (0.49–0.68) to 0.73 (0.59–0.86), p = 0.03 among participants aged 18–24 years, and from 0.75 (0.71–0.78) to 0.85 (0.78–0.91), p = 0.03 among participants aged ≥ 25 years. VS (< 1,000 copies/mL) was approximately 87% in both phases. CONCLUSIONS: After implementation of the case management intervention, we observed significant improvement in 6-month retention in all age groups of a highly mobile population of predominantly fisher folk. BioMed Central 2022-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9724352/ /pubmed/36471321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12981-022-00486-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Meya, David B. Kiragga, Agnes N. Nalintya, Elizabeth Banturaki, Grace Akullo, Joan Kalyesubula, Phillip Sessazi, Patrick Bitakalamire, Hillary Kabanda, Joseph Kalamya, Julius N. Namale, Alice Bateganya, Moses Kagaayi, Joseph Gutreuter, Steve Adler, Michelle R. Mitruka, Kiren Impact of an intensive facility-community case management intervention on 6-month HIV outcomes among select key and priority populations in Uganda |
title | Impact of an intensive facility-community case management intervention on 6-month HIV outcomes among select key and priority populations in Uganda |
title_full | Impact of an intensive facility-community case management intervention on 6-month HIV outcomes among select key and priority populations in Uganda |
title_fullStr | Impact of an intensive facility-community case management intervention on 6-month HIV outcomes among select key and priority populations in Uganda |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of an intensive facility-community case management intervention on 6-month HIV outcomes among select key and priority populations in Uganda |
title_short | Impact of an intensive facility-community case management intervention on 6-month HIV outcomes among select key and priority populations in Uganda |
title_sort | impact of an intensive facility-community case management intervention on 6-month hiv outcomes among select key and priority populations in uganda |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9724352/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36471321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12981-022-00486-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meyadavidb impactofanintensivefacilitycommunitycasemanagementinterventionon6monthhivoutcomesamongselectkeyandprioritypopulationsinuganda AT kiraggaagnesn impactofanintensivefacilitycommunitycasemanagementinterventionon6monthhivoutcomesamongselectkeyandprioritypopulationsinuganda AT nalintyaelizabeth impactofanintensivefacilitycommunitycasemanagementinterventionon6monthhivoutcomesamongselectkeyandprioritypopulationsinuganda AT banturakigrace impactofanintensivefacilitycommunitycasemanagementinterventionon6monthhivoutcomesamongselectkeyandprioritypopulationsinuganda AT akullojoan impactofanintensivefacilitycommunitycasemanagementinterventionon6monthhivoutcomesamongselectkeyandprioritypopulationsinuganda AT kalyesubulaphillip impactofanintensivefacilitycommunitycasemanagementinterventionon6monthhivoutcomesamongselectkeyandprioritypopulationsinuganda AT sessazipatrick impactofanintensivefacilitycommunitycasemanagementinterventionon6monthhivoutcomesamongselectkeyandprioritypopulationsinuganda AT bitakalamirehillary impactofanintensivefacilitycommunitycasemanagementinterventionon6monthhivoutcomesamongselectkeyandprioritypopulationsinuganda AT kabandajoseph impactofanintensivefacilitycommunitycasemanagementinterventionon6monthhivoutcomesamongselectkeyandprioritypopulationsinuganda AT kalamyajuliusn impactofanintensivefacilitycommunitycasemanagementinterventionon6monthhivoutcomesamongselectkeyandprioritypopulationsinuganda AT namalealice impactofanintensivefacilitycommunitycasemanagementinterventionon6monthhivoutcomesamongselectkeyandprioritypopulationsinuganda AT bateganyamoses impactofanintensivefacilitycommunitycasemanagementinterventionon6monthhivoutcomesamongselectkeyandprioritypopulationsinuganda AT kagaayijoseph impactofanintensivefacilitycommunitycasemanagementinterventionon6monthhivoutcomesamongselectkeyandprioritypopulationsinuganda AT gutreutersteve impactofanintensivefacilitycommunitycasemanagementinterventionon6monthhivoutcomesamongselectkeyandprioritypopulationsinuganda AT adlermicheller impactofanintensivefacilitycommunitycasemanagementinterventionon6monthhivoutcomesamongselectkeyandprioritypopulationsinuganda AT mitrukakiren impactofanintensivefacilitycommunitycasemanagementinterventionon6monthhivoutcomesamongselectkeyandprioritypopulationsinuganda |