Cargando…

Impact of an intensive facility-community case management intervention on 6-month HIV outcomes among select key and priority populations in Uganda

INTRODUCTION: Key and priority populations (with risk behaviours and health inequities) are disproportionately affected by HIV in Uganda. We evaluated the impact of an intensive case management intervention on HIV treatment outcomes in Kalangala District, predominantly inhabited by fisher folk and f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meya, David B., Kiragga, Agnes N., Nalintya, Elizabeth, Banturaki, Grace, Akullo, Joan, Kalyesubula, Phillip, Sessazi, Patrick, Bitakalamire, Hillary, Kabanda, Joseph, Kalamya, Julius N., Namale, Alice, Bateganya, Moses, Kagaayi, Joseph, Gutreuter, Steve, Adler, Michelle R., Mitruka, Kiren
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9724352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36471321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12981-022-00486-9
_version_ 1784844395518885888
author Meya, David B.
Kiragga, Agnes N.
Nalintya, Elizabeth
Banturaki, Grace
Akullo, Joan
Kalyesubula, Phillip
Sessazi, Patrick
Bitakalamire, Hillary
Kabanda, Joseph
Kalamya, Julius N.
Namale, Alice
Bateganya, Moses
Kagaayi, Joseph
Gutreuter, Steve
Adler, Michelle R.
Mitruka, Kiren
author_facet Meya, David B.
Kiragga, Agnes N.
Nalintya, Elizabeth
Banturaki, Grace
Akullo, Joan
Kalyesubula, Phillip
Sessazi, Patrick
Bitakalamire, Hillary
Kabanda, Joseph
Kalamya, Julius N.
Namale, Alice
Bateganya, Moses
Kagaayi, Joseph
Gutreuter, Steve
Adler, Michelle R.
Mitruka, Kiren
author_sort Meya, David B.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Key and priority populations (with risk behaviours and health inequities) are disproportionately affected by HIV in Uganda. We evaluated the impact of an intensive case management intervention on HIV treatment outcomes in Kalangala District, predominantly inhabited by fisher folk and female sex workers. METHODS: This quasi-experimental pre-post intervention evaluation included antiretroviral therapy naïve adults aged ≥ 18 years from six health facilities in the pre-intervention (Jan 1, 2017–December 31, 2017) and intervention phase (June 13, 2018–June 30, 2019). The primary outcomes were 6-month retention and viral suppression (VS) before and after implementation of the intervention involving facility and community case managers who supported participants through at least the first three months of ART. We used descriptive statistics to compared the characteristics, overall outcomes (i.e., retention, lost to follow up, died), and VS of participants by phase, and used mixed-effects logistic regression models to determine factors associated with 6-month retention in care. Marginal (averaging over facilities) probabilities of retention were computed from the final multivariable model. RESULTS: We enrolled 606 and 405 participants in the pre-intervention and intervention phases respectively. Approximately 75% of participants were aged 25–44 years, with similar age and gender distributions among phases. Approximately 46% of participants in the intervention were fisher folk and 9% were female sex workers. The adjusted probability of 6-month retention was higher in the intervention phase, 0.83 (95% CI: 0.77–0.90) versus pre-intervention phase, 0.73 (95% CI: 0.69–0.77, p = 0.03). The retention probability increased from 0.59 (0.49–0.68) to 0.73 (0.59–0.86), p = 0.03 among participants aged 18–24 years, and from 0.75 (0.71–0.78) to 0.85 (0.78–0.91), p = 0.03 among participants aged ≥ 25 years. VS (< 1,000 copies/mL) was approximately 87% in both phases. CONCLUSIONS: After implementation of the case management intervention, we observed significant improvement in 6-month retention in all age groups of a highly mobile population of predominantly fisher folk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9724352
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97243522022-12-07 Impact of an intensive facility-community case management intervention on 6-month HIV outcomes among select key and priority populations in Uganda Meya, David B. Kiragga, Agnes N. Nalintya, Elizabeth Banturaki, Grace Akullo, Joan Kalyesubula, Phillip Sessazi, Patrick Bitakalamire, Hillary Kabanda, Joseph Kalamya, Julius N. Namale, Alice Bateganya, Moses Kagaayi, Joseph Gutreuter, Steve Adler, Michelle R. Mitruka, Kiren AIDS Res Ther Research INTRODUCTION: Key and priority populations (with risk behaviours and health inequities) are disproportionately affected by HIV in Uganda. We evaluated the impact of an intensive case management intervention on HIV treatment outcomes in Kalangala District, predominantly inhabited by fisher folk and female sex workers. METHODS: This quasi-experimental pre-post intervention evaluation included antiretroviral therapy naïve adults aged ≥ 18 years from six health facilities in the pre-intervention (Jan 1, 2017–December 31, 2017) and intervention phase (June 13, 2018–June 30, 2019). The primary outcomes were 6-month retention and viral suppression (VS) before and after implementation of the intervention involving facility and community case managers who supported participants through at least the first three months of ART. We used descriptive statistics to compared the characteristics, overall outcomes (i.e., retention, lost to follow up, died), and VS of participants by phase, and used mixed-effects logistic regression models to determine factors associated with 6-month retention in care. Marginal (averaging over facilities) probabilities of retention were computed from the final multivariable model. RESULTS: We enrolled 606 and 405 participants in the pre-intervention and intervention phases respectively. Approximately 75% of participants were aged 25–44 years, with similar age and gender distributions among phases. Approximately 46% of participants in the intervention were fisher folk and 9% were female sex workers. The adjusted probability of 6-month retention was higher in the intervention phase, 0.83 (95% CI: 0.77–0.90) versus pre-intervention phase, 0.73 (95% CI: 0.69–0.77, p = 0.03). The retention probability increased from 0.59 (0.49–0.68) to 0.73 (0.59–0.86), p = 0.03 among participants aged 18–24 years, and from 0.75 (0.71–0.78) to 0.85 (0.78–0.91), p = 0.03 among participants aged ≥ 25 years. VS (< 1,000 copies/mL) was approximately 87% in both phases. CONCLUSIONS: After implementation of the case management intervention, we observed significant improvement in 6-month retention in all age groups of a highly mobile population of predominantly fisher folk. BioMed Central 2022-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9724352/ /pubmed/36471321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12981-022-00486-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Meya, David B.
Kiragga, Agnes N.
Nalintya, Elizabeth
Banturaki, Grace
Akullo, Joan
Kalyesubula, Phillip
Sessazi, Patrick
Bitakalamire, Hillary
Kabanda, Joseph
Kalamya, Julius N.
Namale, Alice
Bateganya, Moses
Kagaayi, Joseph
Gutreuter, Steve
Adler, Michelle R.
Mitruka, Kiren
Impact of an intensive facility-community case management intervention on 6-month HIV outcomes among select key and priority populations in Uganda
title Impact of an intensive facility-community case management intervention on 6-month HIV outcomes among select key and priority populations in Uganda
title_full Impact of an intensive facility-community case management intervention on 6-month HIV outcomes among select key and priority populations in Uganda
title_fullStr Impact of an intensive facility-community case management intervention on 6-month HIV outcomes among select key and priority populations in Uganda
title_full_unstemmed Impact of an intensive facility-community case management intervention on 6-month HIV outcomes among select key and priority populations in Uganda
title_short Impact of an intensive facility-community case management intervention on 6-month HIV outcomes among select key and priority populations in Uganda
title_sort impact of an intensive facility-community case management intervention on 6-month hiv outcomes among select key and priority populations in uganda
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9724352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36471321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12981-022-00486-9
work_keys_str_mv AT meyadavidb impactofanintensivefacilitycommunitycasemanagementinterventionon6monthhivoutcomesamongselectkeyandprioritypopulationsinuganda
AT kiraggaagnesn impactofanintensivefacilitycommunitycasemanagementinterventionon6monthhivoutcomesamongselectkeyandprioritypopulationsinuganda
AT nalintyaelizabeth impactofanintensivefacilitycommunitycasemanagementinterventionon6monthhivoutcomesamongselectkeyandprioritypopulationsinuganda
AT banturakigrace impactofanintensivefacilitycommunitycasemanagementinterventionon6monthhivoutcomesamongselectkeyandprioritypopulationsinuganda
AT akullojoan impactofanintensivefacilitycommunitycasemanagementinterventionon6monthhivoutcomesamongselectkeyandprioritypopulationsinuganda
AT kalyesubulaphillip impactofanintensivefacilitycommunitycasemanagementinterventionon6monthhivoutcomesamongselectkeyandprioritypopulationsinuganda
AT sessazipatrick impactofanintensivefacilitycommunitycasemanagementinterventionon6monthhivoutcomesamongselectkeyandprioritypopulationsinuganda
AT bitakalamirehillary impactofanintensivefacilitycommunitycasemanagementinterventionon6monthhivoutcomesamongselectkeyandprioritypopulationsinuganda
AT kabandajoseph impactofanintensivefacilitycommunitycasemanagementinterventionon6monthhivoutcomesamongselectkeyandprioritypopulationsinuganda
AT kalamyajuliusn impactofanintensivefacilitycommunitycasemanagementinterventionon6monthhivoutcomesamongselectkeyandprioritypopulationsinuganda
AT namalealice impactofanintensivefacilitycommunitycasemanagementinterventionon6monthhivoutcomesamongselectkeyandprioritypopulationsinuganda
AT bateganyamoses impactofanintensivefacilitycommunitycasemanagementinterventionon6monthhivoutcomesamongselectkeyandprioritypopulationsinuganda
AT kagaayijoseph impactofanintensivefacilitycommunitycasemanagementinterventionon6monthhivoutcomesamongselectkeyandprioritypopulationsinuganda
AT gutreutersteve impactofanintensivefacilitycommunitycasemanagementinterventionon6monthhivoutcomesamongselectkeyandprioritypopulationsinuganda
AT adlermicheller impactofanintensivefacilitycommunitycasemanagementinterventionon6monthhivoutcomesamongselectkeyandprioritypopulationsinuganda
AT mitrukakiren impactofanintensivefacilitycommunitycasemanagementinterventionon6monthhivoutcomesamongselectkeyandprioritypopulationsinuganda