Cargando…

Effectiveness of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine as evidence for policy action: A rapid systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized studies

In December 2020, an interim recommendation for the use of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine in persons aged ≥16 years was made under Food and Drug Administration’s Emergency Use Authorization. In preparation for Biologics License Application approval, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analys...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wallace, Megan, Collins, Jennifer P., Moline, Heidi, Plumb, Ian D., Godfrey, Monica, Morgan, Rebecca L., Campos-Outcalt, Doug, Oliver, Sara E., Dooling, Kathleen, Gargano, Julia W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9725157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36473010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278624
_version_ 1784844519520337920
author Wallace, Megan
Collins, Jennifer P.
Moline, Heidi
Plumb, Ian D.
Godfrey, Monica
Morgan, Rebecca L.
Campos-Outcalt, Doug
Oliver, Sara E.
Dooling, Kathleen
Gargano, Julia W.
author_facet Wallace, Megan
Collins, Jennifer P.
Moline, Heidi
Plumb, Ian D.
Godfrey, Monica
Morgan, Rebecca L.
Campos-Outcalt, Doug
Oliver, Sara E.
Dooling, Kathleen
Gargano, Julia W.
author_sort Wallace, Megan
collection PubMed
description In December 2020, an interim recommendation for the use of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine in persons aged ≥16 years was made under Food and Drug Administration’s Emergency Use Authorization. In preparation for Biologics License Application approval, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to inform the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee for Immunization Practice’s (ACIP) decision-making for a standard recommendation. We conducted a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine effectiveness (VE) against symptomatic COVID-19, hospitalization due to COVID-19, death due to COVID-19, and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. We identified studies through August 20, 2021 from an ongoing systematic review conducted by the International Vaccine Access Center and the World Health Organization. We evaluated each study for risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled estimates were calculated using meta-analysis. The body of evidence for each outcome was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. We identified 80 articles, selected 35 for full-text review, and included 26. The pooled VE of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine was 92.4% (95% CI: 87.5%–95.3%) against symptomatic COVID-19 with moderate evidence certainty (eight studies), 94.3% (95% CI: 87.9%–97.3%) against hospitalization due to COVID-19 with moderate certainty (eight studies), 96.1% (95% CI: 91.5%–98.2%) against death due to COVID-19 with moderate certainty (four studies), and 89.3% (88.4%–90.1%) against asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection with very low certainty (two studies). The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine demonstrated high effectiveness in all pre-specified outcomes and extended knowledge of the vaccine’s benefits to outcomes and populations not informed by the RCTs. Use of an existing systematic review facilitated a rapid meta-analysis to inform an ACIP policy decision. This approach can be utilized as additional COVID-19 vaccines are considered for standard recommendations by ACIP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9725157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97251572022-12-07 Effectiveness of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine as evidence for policy action: A rapid systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized studies Wallace, Megan Collins, Jennifer P. Moline, Heidi Plumb, Ian D. Godfrey, Monica Morgan, Rebecca L. Campos-Outcalt, Doug Oliver, Sara E. Dooling, Kathleen Gargano, Julia W. PLoS One Research Article In December 2020, an interim recommendation for the use of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine in persons aged ≥16 years was made under Food and Drug Administration’s Emergency Use Authorization. In preparation for Biologics License Application approval, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to inform the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee for Immunization Practice’s (ACIP) decision-making for a standard recommendation. We conducted a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine effectiveness (VE) against symptomatic COVID-19, hospitalization due to COVID-19, death due to COVID-19, and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. We identified studies through August 20, 2021 from an ongoing systematic review conducted by the International Vaccine Access Center and the World Health Organization. We evaluated each study for risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled estimates were calculated using meta-analysis. The body of evidence for each outcome was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. We identified 80 articles, selected 35 for full-text review, and included 26. The pooled VE of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine was 92.4% (95% CI: 87.5%–95.3%) against symptomatic COVID-19 with moderate evidence certainty (eight studies), 94.3% (95% CI: 87.9%–97.3%) against hospitalization due to COVID-19 with moderate certainty (eight studies), 96.1% (95% CI: 91.5%–98.2%) against death due to COVID-19 with moderate certainty (four studies), and 89.3% (88.4%–90.1%) against asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection with very low certainty (two studies). The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine demonstrated high effectiveness in all pre-specified outcomes and extended knowledge of the vaccine’s benefits to outcomes and populations not informed by the RCTs. Use of an existing systematic review facilitated a rapid meta-analysis to inform an ACIP policy decision. This approach can be utilized as additional COVID-19 vaccines are considered for standard recommendations by ACIP. Public Library of Science 2022-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9725157/ /pubmed/36473010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278624 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wallace, Megan
Collins, Jennifer P.
Moline, Heidi
Plumb, Ian D.
Godfrey, Monica
Morgan, Rebecca L.
Campos-Outcalt, Doug
Oliver, Sara E.
Dooling, Kathleen
Gargano, Julia W.
Effectiveness of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine as evidence for policy action: A rapid systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized studies
title Effectiveness of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine as evidence for policy action: A rapid systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized studies
title_full Effectiveness of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine as evidence for policy action: A rapid systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized studies
title_fullStr Effectiveness of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine as evidence for policy action: A rapid systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized studies
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine as evidence for policy action: A rapid systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized studies
title_short Effectiveness of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine as evidence for policy action: A rapid systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized studies
title_sort effectiveness of pfizer-biontech covid-19 vaccine as evidence for policy action: a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9725157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36473010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278624
work_keys_str_mv AT wallacemegan effectivenessofpfizerbiontechcovid19vaccineasevidenceforpolicyactionarapidsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofnonrandomizedstudies
AT collinsjenniferp effectivenessofpfizerbiontechcovid19vaccineasevidenceforpolicyactionarapidsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofnonrandomizedstudies
AT molineheidi effectivenessofpfizerbiontechcovid19vaccineasevidenceforpolicyactionarapidsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofnonrandomizedstudies
AT plumbiand effectivenessofpfizerbiontechcovid19vaccineasevidenceforpolicyactionarapidsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofnonrandomizedstudies
AT godfreymonica effectivenessofpfizerbiontechcovid19vaccineasevidenceforpolicyactionarapidsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofnonrandomizedstudies
AT morganrebeccal effectivenessofpfizerbiontechcovid19vaccineasevidenceforpolicyactionarapidsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofnonrandomizedstudies
AT camposoutcaltdoug effectivenessofpfizerbiontechcovid19vaccineasevidenceforpolicyactionarapidsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofnonrandomizedstudies
AT oliversarae effectivenessofpfizerbiontechcovid19vaccineasevidenceforpolicyactionarapidsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofnonrandomizedstudies
AT doolingkathleen effectivenessofpfizerbiontechcovid19vaccineasevidenceforpolicyactionarapidsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofnonrandomizedstudies
AT garganojuliaw effectivenessofpfizerbiontechcovid19vaccineasevidenceforpolicyactionarapidsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofnonrandomizedstudies