Cargando…
Effectiveness of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine as evidence for policy action: A rapid systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized studies
In December 2020, an interim recommendation for the use of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine in persons aged ≥16 years was made under Food and Drug Administration’s Emergency Use Authorization. In preparation for Biologics License Application approval, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analys...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9725157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36473010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278624 |
_version_ | 1784844519520337920 |
---|---|
author | Wallace, Megan Collins, Jennifer P. Moline, Heidi Plumb, Ian D. Godfrey, Monica Morgan, Rebecca L. Campos-Outcalt, Doug Oliver, Sara E. Dooling, Kathleen Gargano, Julia W. |
author_facet | Wallace, Megan Collins, Jennifer P. Moline, Heidi Plumb, Ian D. Godfrey, Monica Morgan, Rebecca L. Campos-Outcalt, Doug Oliver, Sara E. Dooling, Kathleen Gargano, Julia W. |
author_sort | Wallace, Megan |
collection | PubMed |
description | In December 2020, an interim recommendation for the use of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine in persons aged ≥16 years was made under Food and Drug Administration’s Emergency Use Authorization. In preparation for Biologics License Application approval, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to inform the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee for Immunization Practice’s (ACIP) decision-making for a standard recommendation. We conducted a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine effectiveness (VE) against symptomatic COVID-19, hospitalization due to COVID-19, death due to COVID-19, and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. We identified studies through August 20, 2021 from an ongoing systematic review conducted by the International Vaccine Access Center and the World Health Organization. We evaluated each study for risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled estimates were calculated using meta-analysis. The body of evidence for each outcome was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. We identified 80 articles, selected 35 for full-text review, and included 26. The pooled VE of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine was 92.4% (95% CI: 87.5%–95.3%) against symptomatic COVID-19 with moderate evidence certainty (eight studies), 94.3% (95% CI: 87.9%–97.3%) against hospitalization due to COVID-19 with moderate certainty (eight studies), 96.1% (95% CI: 91.5%–98.2%) against death due to COVID-19 with moderate certainty (four studies), and 89.3% (88.4%–90.1%) against asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection with very low certainty (two studies). The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine demonstrated high effectiveness in all pre-specified outcomes and extended knowledge of the vaccine’s benefits to outcomes and populations not informed by the RCTs. Use of an existing systematic review facilitated a rapid meta-analysis to inform an ACIP policy decision. This approach can be utilized as additional COVID-19 vaccines are considered for standard recommendations by ACIP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9725157 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97251572022-12-07 Effectiveness of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine as evidence for policy action: A rapid systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized studies Wallace, Megan Collins, Jennifer P. Moline, Heidi Plumb, Ian D. Godfrey, Monica Morgan, Rebecca L. Campos-Outcalt, Doug Oliver, Sara E. Dooling, Kathleen Gargano, Julia W. PLoS One Research Article In December 2020, an interim recommendation for the use of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine in persons aged ≥16 years was made under Food and Drug Administration’s Emergency Use Authorization. In preparation for Biologics License Application approval, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to inform the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee for Immunization Practice’s (ACIP) decision-making for a standard recommendation. We conducted a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine effectiveness (VE) against symptomatic COVID-19, hospitalization due to COVID-19, death due to COVID-19, and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. We identified studies through August 20, 2021 from an ongoing systematic review conducted by the International Vaccine Access Center and the World Health Organization. We evaluated each study for risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled estimates were calculated using meta-analysis. The body of evidence for each outcome was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. We identified 80 articles, selected 35 for full-text review, and included 26. The pooled VE of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine was 92.4% (95% CI: 87.5%–95.3%) against symptomatic COVID-19 with moderate evidence certainty (eight studies), 94.3% (95% CI: 87.9%–97.3%) against hospitalization due to COVID-19 with moderate certainty (eight studies), 96.1% (95% CI: 91.5%–98.2%) against death due to COVID-19 with moderate certainty (four studies), and 89.3% (88.4%–90.1%) against asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection with very low certainty (two studies). The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine demonstrated high effectiveness in all pre-specified outcomes and extended knowledge of the vaccine’s benefits to outcomes and populations not informed by the RCTs. Use of an existing systematic review facilitated a rapid meta-analysis to inform an ACIP policy decision. This approach can be utilized as additional COVID-19 vaccines are considered for standard recommendations by ACIP. Public Library of Science 2022-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9725157/ /pubmed/36473010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278624 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wallace, Megan Collins, Jennifer P. Moline, Heidi Plumb, Ian D. Godfrey, Monica Morgan, Rebecca L. Campos-Outcalt, Doug Oliver, Sara E. Dooling, Kathleen Gargano, Julia W. Effectiveness of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine as evidence for policy action: A rapid systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized studies |
title | Effectiveness of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine as evidence for policy action: A rapid systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized studies |
title_full | Effectiveness of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine as evidence for policy action: A rapid systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized studies |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine as evidence for policy action: A rapid systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine as evidence for policy action: A rapid systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized studies |
title_short | Effectiveness of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine as evidence for policy action: A rapid systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized studies |
title_sort | effectiveness of pfizer-biontech covid-19 vaccine as evidence for policy action: a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized studies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9725157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36473010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278624 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wallacemegan effectivenessofpfizerbiontechcovid19vaccineasevidenceforpolicyactionarapidsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofnonrandomizedstudies AT collinsjenniferp effectivenessofpfizerbiontechcovid19vaccineasevidenceforpolicyactionarapidsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofnonrandomizedstudies AT molineheidi effectivenessofpfizerbiontechcovid19vaccineasevidenceforpolicyactionarapidsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofnonrandomizedstudies AT plumbiand effectivenessofpfizerbiontechcovid19vaccineasevidenceforpolicyactionarapidsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofnonrandomizedstudies AT godfreymonica effectivenessofpfizerbiontechcovid19vaccineasevidenceforpolicyactionarapidsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofnonrandomizedstudies AT morganrebeccal effectivenessofpfizerbiontechcovid19vaccineasevidenceforpolicyactionarapidsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofnonrandomizedstudies AT camposoutcaltdoug effectivenessofpfizerbiontechcovid19vaccineasevidenceforpolicyactionarapidsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofnonrandomizedstudies AT oliversarae effectivenessofpfizerbiontechcovid19vaccineasevidenceforpolicyactionarapidsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofnonrandomizedstudies AT doolingkathleen effectivenessofpfizerbiontechcovid19vaccineasevidenceforpolicyactionarapidsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofnonrandomizedstudies AT garganojuliaw effectivenessofpfizerbiontechcovid19vaccineasevidenceforpolicyactionarapidsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofnonrandomizedstudies |