Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of COVID‐19 vaccines

BACKGROUND: Different forms of vaccines have been developed to prevent the SARS‐CoV‐2 virus and subsequent COVID‐19 disease. Several are in widespread use globally. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of COVID‐19 vaccines (as a full primary vaccination series or a booster dose) against SA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Graña, Carolina, Ghosn, Lina, Evrenoglou, Theodoros, Jarde, Alexander, Minozzi, Silvia, Bergman, Hanna, Buckley, Brian S, Probyn, Katrin, Villanueva, Gemma, Henschke, Nicholas, Bonnet, Hillary, Assi, Rouba, Menon, Sonia, Marti, Melanie, Devane, Declan, Mallon, Patrick, Lelievre, Jean-Daniel, Askie, Lisa M, Kredo, Tamara, Ferrand, Gabriel, Davidson, Mauricia, Riveros, Carolina, Tovey, David, Meerpohl, Joerg J, Grasselli, Giacomo, Rada, Gabriel, Hróbjartsson, Asbjørn, Ravaud, Philippe, Chaimani, Anna, Boutron, Isabelle
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2022
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9726273/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36473651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD015477

Ejemplares similares

Reporting Methods of Blinding in Randomized Trials Assessing Nonpharmacological Treatments
por: Boutron, Isabelle, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Methods of Blinding in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing Pharmacologic Treatments: A Systematic Review
por: Boutron, Isabelle, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

Use of wearable biometric monitoring devices to measure outcomes in randomized clinical trials: a methodological systematic review
por: Graña Possamai, Carolina, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Factors associated with online media attention to research: a cohort study of articles evaluating cancer treatments
por: Haneef, Romana, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Association between trial registration and treatment effect estimates: a meta-epidemiological study
por: Dechartres, Agnès, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Risk of bias in observational studies using routinely collected data of comparative effectiveness research: a meta-research study
por: Nguyen, Van Thu, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Timing and Completeness of Trial Results Posted at ClinicalTrials.gov and Published in Journals
por: Riveros, Carolina, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Network meta‐analysis of rare events using penalized likelihood regression
por: Evrenoglou, Theodoros, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration
por: Turner, Lucy, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Toward an observatory of the evolution of clinical trials through phylomemy reconstruction: the COVID-19 vaccines example
por: Lobbé, Quentin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Transparency and reporting characteristics of COVID-19 randomized controlled trials
por: Kapp, Philipp, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Patients’ views of wearable devices and AI in healthcare: findings from the ComPaRe e-cohort
por: Tran, Viet-Thi, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Effect of editors’ implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis
por: Hopewell, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Reporting of analyses from randomized controlled trials with multiple arms: a systematic review
por: Baron, Gabriel, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Impact of sending email reminders of the legal requirement for posting results on ClinicalTrials.gov: cohort embedded pragmatic randomized controlled trial
por: Maruani, Annabel, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Designs of trials assessing interventions to improve the peer review process: a vignette-based survey
por: Heim, Amytis, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Comparison of Estimates between Cohort and Case–Control Studies in Meta-Analyses of Therapeutic Interventions: A Meta-Epidemiological Study
por: Lanza, Amy, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Secondary electronic sources demonstrated very good sensitivity for identifying studies evaluating interventions for COVID-19
por: Pierre, Olivier, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Research response to coronavirus disease 2019 needed better coordination and collaboration: a living mapping of registered trials
por: Nguyen, Van Thu, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Promoting public access to clinical trial protocols: challenges and recommendations
por: Chan, An-Wen, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors
por: Chauvin, Anthony, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Impact of adding a limitations section to abstracts of systematic reviews on readers’ interpretation: a randomized controlled trial
por: Yavchitz, Amélie, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Comparison of serious adverse events posted at ClinicalTrials.gov and published in corresponding journal articles
por: Tang, Eve, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Meta-analyses including non-randomized studies of therapeutic interventions: a methodological review
por: Faber, Timor, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Quality of reporting internal and external validity data from randomized controlled trials evaluating stents for percutaneous coronary intervention
por: Ethgen, Morgane, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Reporting of harm in randomized controlled trials evaluating stents for percutaneous coronary intervention
por: Ethgen, Morgane, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Patients’ perspective on how to improve the care of people with chronic conditions in France: a citizen science study within the ComPaRe e-cohort
por: Tran, Viet-Thi, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Completeness and Mismatch of Patient-Important Outcomes After Trauma
por: James, Arthur, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Influence and management of conflicts of interest in randomised clinical trials: qualitative interview study
por: Østengaard, Lasse, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Impact of blinding on estimated treatment effects in randomised clinical trials: meta-epidemiological study
por: Moustgaard, Helene, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Knee Arthroplasty: Disabilities in Comparison to the General Population and to Hip Arthroplasty Using a French National Longitudinal Survey
por: Dechartres, Agnes, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Development and Evaluation of a Pedagogical Tool to Improve Understanding of a Quality Checklist: A Randomised Controlled Trial
por: Fourcade, Lola, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Public availability of results of observational studies evaluating an intervention registered at ClinicalTrials.gov
por: Baudart, Marie, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Accuracy in detecting inadequate research reporting by early career peer reviewers using an online CONSORT-based peer-review tool (COBPeer) versus the usual peer-review process: a cross-sectional diagnostic study
por: Chauvin, Anthony, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Evaluation of the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized clinical trials: overview of published comments and analysis of user practice in Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews
por: Jørgensen, Lars, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Reporting of statistically significant results at ClinicalTrials.gov for completed superiority randomized controlled trials
por: Dechartres, Agnes, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Acupuncture treatment for pain: systematic review of randomised clinical trials with acupuncture, placebo acupuncture, and no acupuncture groups
por: Madsen, Matias Vested, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Spontaneous improvement in randomised clinical trials: meta-analysis of three-armed trials comparing no treatment, placebo and active intervention
por: Krogsbøll, Lasse Theis, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Divine intervention? A Cochrane review on intercessory prayer gone beyond science and reason
por: Jørgensen, Karsten Juhl, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

The matching quality of experimental and control interventions in blinded pharmacological randomised clinical trials: a methodological systematic review
por: Bello, Segun, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_lh0tldn1np6uu2v1phn7563llv