Cargando…

Medial Pivot Designs Versus Conventional Bearing Types in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Medial pivot (MP) designs are growing in popularity. They provide increased sagittal plane stability and theoretically replicate some aspects of native joint kinematics, which may improve total knee arthroplasty outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review was performed of randomized controlled trials (RC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoskins, Wayne, Smith, Guy, Spelman, Tim, Vince, Kelly G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9726426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36732308
http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-22-00170
_version_ 1784844780324257792
author Hoskins, Wayne
Smith, Guy
Spelman, Tim
Vince, Kelly G.
author_facet Hoskins, Wayne
Smith, Guy
Spelman, Tim
Vince, Kelly G.
author_sort Hoskins, Wayne
collection PubMed
description Medial pivot (MP) designs are growing in popularity. They provide increased sagittal plane stability and theoretically replicate some aspects of native joint kinematics, which may improve total knee arthroplasty outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review was performed of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared MP designs with cruciate-retaining, posterior-stabilized (PS), ultracongruent, or mobile-bearings in primary total knee arthroplasty, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The primary outcome measures were all clinical function scores, patient-reported outcome measures, and range of motion. The secondary outcome was complications. Two authors independently selected studies, performed data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment. Studies at high risk of bias were excluded from meta-analysis. Treatment effects were assessed using random-effects meta-analysis and quantified using pooled mean differences or incidence rate differences as appropriate. RESULTS: Eight RCTs met inclusion criteria. Five compared MP with PS, two with ultracongruent, and one with cruciate-retaining and mobile-bearing. In total, 350 knees were randomized to MP and 375 to conventional bearings. One RCT was excluded from meta-analysis because of high risk of bias. Meta-analysis comparing MP with PS only was possible and found no differences at any time points for any outcome measure, including 2-year follow-up for Oxford Knee Score (MD = 0.35 favoring PS; 95% CI −0.49 to 1.20) and range of motion (MD = 1.58 favoring MP; 95% CI −0.76 to 11.92, P = 0.30) and 12 months for Western Ontario Arthritis Index (MD = 4.42 favoring MP; 95% CI −12.04 to 3.20, P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference in clinical outcomes, with contemporary measurement tools, at any time points, between MP and PS. There are insufficient RCTs comparing MP with other bearings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9726426
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97264262022-12-09 Medial Pivot Designs Versus Conventional Bearing Types in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Hoskins, Wayne Smith, Guy Spelman, Tim Vince, Kelly G. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev Research Article Medial pivot (MP) designs are growing in popularity. They provide increased sagittal plane stability and theoretically replicate some aspects of native joint kinematics, which may improve total knee arthroplasty outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review was performed of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared MP designs with cruciate-retaining, posterior-stabilized (PS), ultracongruent, or mobile-bearings in primary total knee arthroplasty, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The primary outcome measures were all clinical function scores, patient-reported outcome measures, and range of motion. The secondary outcome was complications. Two authors independently selected studies, performed data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment. Studies at high risk of bias were excluded from meta-analysis. Treatment effects were assessed using random-effects meta-analysis and quantified using pooled mean differences or incidence rate differences as appropriate. RESULTS: Eight RCTs met inclusion criteria. Five compared MP with PS, two with ultracongruent, and one with cruciate-retaining and mobile-bearing. In total, 350 knees were randomized to MP and 375 to conventional bearings. One RCT was excluded from meta-analysis because of high risk of bias. Meta-analysis comparing MP with PS only was possible and found no differences at any time points for any outcome measure, including 2-year follow-up for Oxford Knee Score (MD = 0.35 favoring PS; 95% CI −0.49 to 1.20) and range of motion (MD = 1.58 favoring MP; 95% CI −0.76 to 11.92, P = 0.30) and 12 months for Western Ontario Arthritis Index (MD = 4.42 favoring MP; 95% CI −12.04 to 3.20, P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference in clinical outcomes, with contemporary measurement tools, at any time points, between MP and PS. There are insufficient RCTs comparing MP with other bearings. Wolters Kluwer 2022-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9726426/ /pubmed/36732308 http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-22-00170 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hoskins, Wayne
Smith, Guy
Spelman, Tim
Vince, Kelly G.
Medial Pivot Designs Versus Conventional Bearing Types in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title Medial Pivot Designs Versus Conventional Bearing Types in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full Medial Pivot Designs Versus Conventional Bearing Types in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Medial Pivot Designs Versus Conventional Bearing Types in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Medial Pivot Designs Versus Conventional Bearing Types in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short Medial Pivot Designs Versus Conventional Bearing Types in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort medial pivot designs versus conventional bearing types in primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9726426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36732308
http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-22-00170
work_keys_str_mv AT hoskinswayne medialpivotdesignsversusconventionalbearingtypesinprimarytotalkneearthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT smithguy medialpivotdesignsversusconventionalbearingtypesinprimarytotalkneearthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT spelmantim medialpivotdesignsversusconventionalbearingtypesinprimarytotalkneearthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT vincekellyg medialpivotdesignsversusconventionalbearingtypesinprimarytotalkneearthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials