Cargando…
Medial Pivot Designs Versus Conventional Bearing Types in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Medial pivot (MP) designs are growing in popularity. They provide increased sagittal plane stability and theoretically replicate some aspects of native joint kinematics, which may improve total knee arthroplasty outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review was performed of randomized controlled trials (RC...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9726426/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36732308 http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-22-00170 |
_version_ | 1784844780324257792 |
---|---|
author | Hoskins, Wayne Smith, Guy Spelman, Tim Vince, Kelly G. |
author_facet | Hoskins, Wayne Smith, Guy Spelman, Tim Vince, Kelly G. |
author_sort | Hoskins, Wayne |
collection | PubMed |
description | Medial pivot (MP) designs are growing in popularity. They provide increased sagittal plane stability and theoretically replicate some aspects of native joint kinematics, which may improve total knee arthroplasty outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review was performed of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared MP designs with cruciate-retaining, posterior-stabilized (PS), ultracongruent, or mobile-bearings in primary total knee arthroplasty, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The primary outcome measures were all clinical function scores, patient-reported outcome measures, and range of motion. The secondary outcome was complications. Two authors independently selected studies, performed data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment. Studies at high risk of bias were excluded from meta-analysis. Treatment effects were assessed using random-effects meta-analysis and quantified using pooled mean differences or incidence rate differences as appropriate. RESULTS: Eight RCTs met inclusion criteria. Five compared MP with PS, two with ultracongruent, and one with cruciate-retaining and mobile-bearing. In total, 350 knees were randomized to MP and 375 to conventional bearings. One RCT was excluded from meta-analysis because of high risk of bias. Meta-analysis comparing MP with PS only was possible and found no differences at any time points for any outcome measure, including 2-year follow-up for Oxford Knee Score (MD = 0.35 favoring PS; 95% CI −0.49 to 1.20) and range of motion (MD = 1.58 favoring MP; 95% CI −0.76 to 11.92, P = 0.30) and 12 months for Western Ontario Arthritis Index (MD = 4.42 favoring MP; 95% CI −12.04 to 3.20, P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference in clinical outcomes, with contemporary measurement tools, at any time points, between MP and PS. There are insufficient RCTs comparing MP with other bearings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9726426 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97264262022-12-09 Medial Pivot Designs Versus Conventional Bearing Types in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Hoskins, Wayne Smith, Guy Spelman, Tim Vince, Kelly G. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev Research Article Medial pivot (MP) designs are growing in popularity. They provide increased sagittal plane stability and theoretically replicate some aspects of native joint kinematics, which may improve total knee arthroplasty outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review was performed of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared MP designs with cruciate-retaining, posterior-stabilized (PS), ultracongruent, or mobile-bearings in primary total knee arthroplasty, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The primary outcome measures were all clinical function scores, patient-reported outcome measures, and range of motion. The secondary outcome was complications. Two authors independently selected studies, performed data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment. Studies at high risk of bias were excluded from meta-analysis. Treatment effects were assessed using random-effects meta-analysis and quantified using pooled mean differences or incidence rate differences as appropriate. RESULTS: Eight RCTs met inclusion criteria. Five compared MP with PS, two with ultracongruent, and one with cruciate-retaining and mobile-bearing. In total, 350 knees were randomized to MP and 375 to conventional bearings. One RCT was excluded from meta-analysis because of high risk of bias. Meta-analysis comparing MP with PS only was possible and found no differences at any time points for any outcome measure, including 2-year follow-up for Oxford Knee Score (MD = 0.35 favoring PS; 95% CI −0.49 to 1.20) and range of motion (MD = 1.58 favoring MP; 95% CI −0.76 to 11.92, P = 0.30) and 12 months for Western Ontario Arthritis Index (MD = 4.42 favoring MP; 95% CI −12.04 to 3.20, P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference in clinical outcomes, with contemporary measurement tools, at any time points, between MP and PS. There are insufficient RCTs comparing MP with other bearings. Wolters Kluwer 2022-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9726426/ /pubmed/36732308 http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-22-00170 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hoskins, Wayne Smith, Guy Spelman, Tim Vince, Kelly G. Medial Pivot Designs Versus Conventional Bearing Types in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title | Medial Pivot Designs Versus Conventional Bearing Types in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full | Medial Pivot Designs Versus Conventional Bearing Types in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_fullStr | Medial Pivot Designs Versus Conventional Bearing Types in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Medial Pivot Designs Versus Conventional Bearing Types in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_short | Medial Pivot Designs Versus Conventional Bearing Types in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_sort | medial pivot designs versus conventional bearing types in primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9726426/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36732308 http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-22-00170 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hoskinswayne medialpivotdesignsversusconventionalbearingtypesinprimarytotalkneearthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT smithguy medialpivotdesignsversusconventionalbearingtypesinprimarytotalkneearthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT spelmantim medialpivotdesignsversusconventionalbearingtypesinprimarytotalkneearthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT vincekellyg medialpivotdesignsversusconventionalbearingtypesinprimarytotalkneearthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |