Cargando…

Outcomes of thin versus thick-wire snares for cold snare polypectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is commonly used for the resection of colorectal polyps ≤10 mm. Data regarding the influence of snare type on CSP effectiveness are conflicting. Hence, this meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes and safety of thin- and thick-wire snares for CSP. ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giri, Suprabhat, Jearth, Vaneet, Darak, Harish, Sundaram, Sridhar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9726435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36347525
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.141
_version_ 1784844783148072960
author Giri, Suprabhat
Jearth, Vaneet
Darak, Harish
Sundaram, Sridhar
author_facet Giri, Suprabhat
Jearth, Vaneet
Darak, Harish
Sundaram, Sridhar
author_sort Giri, Suprabhat
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is commonly used for the resection of colorectal polyps ≤10 mm. Data regarding the influence of snare type on CSP effectiveness are conflicting. Hence, this meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes and safety of thin- and thick-wire snares for CSP. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the literature published between 2000 and 2021 was performed of various databases for comparative studies evaluating the outcomes of thin- versus thick-wire snares for CSP. RESULTS: Five studies with data on 1,425 polyps were included in the analysis. The thick-wire snare was comparable to the thin-wire snare with respect to complete histological resection (risk ratio [RR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97–1.09), overall bleeding (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.40–2.40), polyp retrieval (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.97–1.04), and involvement of submucosa in the resection specimen (RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.72–2.28). There was no publication bias and a small study effect, and the relative effects remained the same in the sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: CSP using a thin-wire snare has no additional benefit over thick-wire snares in small colorectal polyps. Factors other than snare design may play a role in improving CSP outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9726435
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97264352022-12-13 Outcomes of thin versus thick-wire snares for cold snare polypectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis Giri, Suprabhat Jearth, Vaneet Darak, Harish Sundaram, Sridhar Clin Endosc Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis BACKGROUND/AIMS: Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is commonly used for the resection of colorectal polyps ≤10 mm. Data regarding the influence of snare type on CSP effectiveness are conflicting. Hence, this meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes and safety of thin- and thick-wire snares for CSP. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the literature published between 2000 and 2021 was performed of various databases for comparative studies evaluating the outcomes of thin- versus thick-wire snares for CSP. RESULTS: Five studies with data on 1,425 polyps were included in the analysis. The thick-wire snare was comparable to the thin-wire snare with respect to complete histological resection (risk ratio [RR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97–1.09), overall bleeding (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.40–2.40), polyp retrieval (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.97–1.04), and involvement of submucosa in the resection specimen (RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.72–2.28). There was no publication bias and a small study effect, and the relative effects remained the same in the sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: CSP using a thin-wire snare has no additional benefit over thick-wire snares in small colorectal polyps. Factors other than snare design may play a role in improving CSP outcomes. Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2022-11 2022-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9726435/ /pubmed/36347525 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.141 Text en Copyright © 2022 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Giri, Suprabhat
Jearth, Vaneet
Darak, Harish
Sundaram, Sridhar
Outcomes of thin versus thick-wire snares for cold snare polypectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Outcomes of thin versus thick-wire snares for cold snare polypectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Outcomes of thin versus thick-wire snares for cold snare polypectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Outcomes of thin versus thick-wire snares for cold snare polypectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of thin versus thick-wire snares for cold snare polypectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Outcomes of thin versus thick-wire snares for cold snare polypectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort outcomes of thin versus thick-wire snares for cold snare polypectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9726435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36347525
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.141
work_keys_str_mv AT girisuprabhat outcomesofthinversusthickwiresnaresforcoldsnarepolypectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jearthvaneet outcomesofthinversusthickwiresnaresforcoldsnarepolypectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT darakharish outcomesofthinversusthickwiresnaresforcoldsnarepolypectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sundaramsridhar outcomesofthinversusthickwiresnaresforcoldsnarepolypectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis