Cargando…

Underestimation of endoscopic size in large gastric epithelial neoplasms

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an effective method for resecting gastric adenomas and adenocarcinomas. A significant discrepancy was observed between endoscopic and pathological sizes in samples obtained from patients undergoing ESD. This study elucidates the factors affe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Jae Sun, Kim, Byung Sun, Yang, Min A, Lee, Young Jae, Jung, Gum Mo, Kim, Ji Woong, Cho, Jin Woong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9726444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36464825
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.269
_version_ 1784844785371054080
author Song, Jae Sun
Kim, Byung Sun
Yang, Min A
Lee, Young Jae
Jung, Gum Mo
Kim, Ji Woong
Cho, Jin Woong
author_facet Song, Jae Sun
Kim, Byung Sun
Yang, Min A
Lee, Young Jae
Jung, Gum Mo
Kim, Ji Woong
Cho, Jin Woong
author_sort Song, Jae Sun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an effective method for resecting gastric adenomas and adenocarcinomas. A significant discrepancy was observed between endoscopic and pathological sizes in samples obtained from patients undergoing ESD. This study elucidates the factors affecting size discrepancy after formalin fixation. METHODS: The records of 64 patients with 69 lesions were analyzed, including 50 adenomas and 19 adenocarcinomas. Data on location, gross shape, histology, and size after fixation in formalin were collected. RESULTS: The mean size of the resected specimen appeared to decrease after formalin fixation (37.5 mm prefixation vs. 35.8 mm postfixation, p<0.05). The mean long axis diameter of the lesions was 20.3±7.9 mm prefixation and 13.4±7.9 mm postfixation. Size differences in lesions smaller than 20 mm were significantly greater than those in lesions larger than 20 mm (7.6±5.6 mm vs. 2.5±5.8 mm, p<0.01). In multivariate analysis, a tumor size of ≥20 mm was found to be an independent factor affecting size postformalin fixation (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The endoscopic size of lesions before ESD may be underestimated in tumors larger than 20 mm in size. Therefore, increased attention must be paid during ESD to avoid instances of incomplete resection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9726444
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97264442022-12-13 Underestimation of endoscopic size in large gastric epithelial neoplasms Song, Jae Sun Kim, Byung Sun Yang, Min A Lee, Young Jae Jung, Gum Mo Kim, Ji Woong Cho, Jin Woong Clin Endosc Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an effective method for resecting gastric adenomas and adenocarcinomas. A significant discrepancy was observed between endoscopic and pathological sizes in samples obtained from patients undergoing ESD. This study elucidates the factors affecting size discrepancy after formalin fixation. METHODS: The records of 64 patients with 69 lesions were analyzed, including 50 adenomas and 19 adenocarcinomas. Data on location, gross shape, histology, and size after fixation in formalin were collected. RESULTS: The mean size of the resected specimen appeared to decrease after formalin fixation (37.5 mm prefixation vs. 35.8 mm postfixation, p<0.05). The mean long axis diameter of the lesions was 20.3±7.9 mm prefixation and 13.4±7.9 mm postfixation. Size differences in lesions smaller than 20 mm were significantly greater than those in lesions larger than 20 mm (7.6±5.6 mm vs. 2.5±5.8 mm, p<0.01). In multivariate analysis, a tumor size of ≥20 mm was found to be an independent factor affecting size postformalin fixation (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The endoscopic size of lesions before ESD may be underestimated in tumors larger than 20 mm in size. Therefore, increased attention must be paid during ESD to avoid instances of incomplete resection. Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2022-11 2022-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9726444/ /pubmed/36464825 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.269 Text en Copyright © 2022 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Song, Jae Sun
Kim, Byung Sun
Yang, Min A
Lee, Young Jae
Jung, Gum Mo
Kim, Ji Woong
Cho, Jin Woong
Underestimation of endoscopic size in large gastric epithelial neoplasms
title Underestimation of endoscopic size in large gastric epithelial neoplasms
title_full Underestimation of endoscopic size in large gastric epithelial neoplasms
title_fullStr Underestimation of endoscopic size in large gastric epithelial neoplasms
title_full_unstemmed Underestimation of endoscopic size in large gastric epithelial neoplasms
title_short Underestimation of endoscopic size in large gastric epithelial neoplasms
title_sort underestimation of endoscopic size in large gastric epithelial neoplasms
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9726444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36464825
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.269
work_keys_str_mv AT songjaesun underestimationofendoscopicsizeinlargegastricepithelialneoplasms
AT kimbyungsun underestimationofendoscopicsizeinlargegastricepithelialneoplasms
AT yangmina underestimationofendoscopicsizeinlargegastricepithelialneoplasms
AT leeyoungjae underestimationofendoscopicsizeinlargegastricepithelialneoplasms
AT junggummo underestimationofendoscopicsizeinlargegastricepithelialneoplasms
AT kimjiwoong underestimationofendoscopicsizeinlargegastricepithelialneoplasms
AT chojinwoong underestimationofendoscopicsizeinlargegastricepithelialneoplasms