Cargando…

A dynamic flow model mimicking duodenoscope reprocessing after bacterial contamination for translational research

OBJECTIVE: Duodenoscopy-associated infections and outbreaks are reported globally despite strict adherence to duodenoscope reprocessing protocols. Therefore, new developments in the reprocessing procedure are needed. DESIGN: We evaluated a novel dynamic flow model for an additional cleaning step bet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heuvelmans, Maarten, Woudstra, Willem, Wunderink, Herman F., Monkelbaan, Jan F., van der Mei, Henny C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9726593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36483362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2022.294
_version_ 1784844824537464832
author Heuvelmans, Maarten
Woudstra, Willem
Wunderink, Herman F.
Monkelbaan, Jan F.
van der Mei, Henny C.
author_facet Heuvelmans, Maarten
Woudstra, Willem
Wunderink, Herman F.
Monkelbaan, Jan F.
van der Mei, Henny C.
author_sort Heuvelmans, Maarten
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Duodenoscopy-associated infections and outbreaks are reported globally despite strict adherence to duodenoscope reprocessing protocols. Therefore, new developments in the reprocessing procedure are needed. DESIGN: We evaluated a novel dynamic flow model for an additional cleaning step between precleaning and manual cleaning in the reprocessing procedure. METHODS: A parallel plate flow chamber with a fluorinated ethylene propylene bottom plate was used to mimic the duodenoscope channels. The flow chamber was inoculated with a suspension containing Klebsiella pneumoniae to simulate bacterial contamination during a duodenoscopic procedure. After inoculation the flow chamber was flushed with a detergent mimicking precleaning. Subsequently the flow chamber was subjected to different interventions: flow with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), flow with 2 commercial detergents, flow with sodium dodecyl sulfate with 3 different concentrations, and flow with microbubbles. Adhering bacteria were counted using phase-contrast microscopy throughout the experiment, and finally, bacterial viability was assessed. RESULTS: During precleaning both PBS and 1% (v/v) Neodisher Mediclean Forte were able to desorb bacteria, but neither proved superior. After precleaning only sodium dodecyl sulfate could desorb bacteria. CONCLUSIONS: Flushing during precleaning is an essential step for reducing adhering luminal bacteria, and sodium dodecyl sulfate is a promising detergent for bacterial desorption from duodenoscope channels after precleaning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9726593
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97265932022-12-07 A dynamic flow model mimicking duodenoscope reprocessing after bacterial contamination for translational research Heuvelmans, Maarten Woudstra, Willem Wunderink, Herman F. Monkelbaan, Jan F. van der Mei, Henny C. Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol Original Article OBJECTIVE: Duodenoscopy-associated infections and outbreaks are reported globally despite strict adherence to duodenoscope reprocessing protocols. Therefore, new developments in the reprocessing procedure are needed. DESIGN: We evaluated a novel dynamic flow model for an additional cleaning step between precleaning and manual cleaning in the reprocessing procedure. METHODS: A parallel plate flow chamber with a fluorinated ethylene propylene bottom plate was used to mimic the duodenoscope channels. The flow chamber was inoculated with a suspension containing Klebsiella pneumoniae to simulate bacterial contamination during a duodenoscopic procedure. After inoculation the flow chamber was flushed with a detergent mimicking precleaning. Subsequently the flow chamber was subjected to different interventions: flow with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), flow with 2 commercial detergents, flow with sodium dodecyl sulfate with 3 different concentrations, and flow with microbubbles. Adhering bacteria were counted using phase-contrast microscopy throughout the experiment, and finally, bacterial viability was assessed. RESULTS: During precleaning both PBS and 1% (v/v) Neodisher Mediclean Forte were able to desorb bacteria, but neither proved superior. After precleaning only sodium dodecyl sulfate could desorb bacteria. CONCLUSIONS: Flushing during precleaning is an essential step for reducing adhering luminal bacteria, and sodium dodecyl sulfate is a promising detergent for bacterial desorption from duodenoscope channels after precleaning. Cambridge University Press 2022-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9726593/ /pubmed/36483362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2022.294 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Heuvelmans, Maarten
Woudstra, Willem
Wunderink, Herman F.
Monkelbaan, Jan F.
van der Mei, Henny C.
A dynamic flow model mimicking duodenoscope reprocessing after bacterial contamination for translational research
title A dynamic flow model mimicking duodenoscope reprocessing after bacterial contamination for translational research
title_full A dynamic flow model mimicking duodenoscope reprocessing after bacterial contamination for translational research
title_fullStr A dynamic flow model mimicking duodenoscope reprocessing after bacterial contamination for translational research
title_full_unstemmed A dynamic flow model mimicking duodenoscope reprocessing after bacterial contamination for translational research
title_short A dynamic flow model mimicking duodenoscope reprocessing after bacterial contamination for translational research
title_sort dynamic flow model mimicking duodenoscope reprocessing after bacterial contamination for translational research
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9726593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36483362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2022.294
work_keys_str_mv AT heuvelmansmaarten adynamicflowmodelmimickingduodenoscopereprocessingafterbacterialcontaminationfortranslationalresearch
AT woudstrawillem adynamicflowmodelmimickingduodenoscopereprocessingafterbacterialcontaminationfortranslationalresearch
AT wunderinkhermanf adynamicflowmodelmimickingduodenoscopereprocessingafterbacterialcontaminationfortranslationalresearch
AT monkelbaanjanf adynamicflowmodelmimickingduodenoscopereprocessingafterbacterialcontaminationfortranslationalresearch
AT vandermeihennyc adynamicflowmodelmimickingduodenoscopereprocessingafterbacterialcontaminationfortranslationalresearch
AT heuvelmansmaarten dynamicflowmodelmimickingduodenoscopereprocessingafterbacterialcontaminationfortranslationalresearch
AT woudstrawillem dynamicflowmodelmimickingduodenoscopereprocessingafterbacterialcontaminationfortranslationalresearch
AT wunderinkhermanf dynamicflowmodelmimickingduodenoscopereprocessingafterbacterialcontaminationfortranslationalresearch
AT monkelbaanjanf dynamicflowmodelmimickingduodenoscopereprocessingafterbacterialcontaminationfortranslationalresearch
AT vandermeihennyc dynamicflowmodelmimickingduodenoscopereprocessingafterbacterialcontaminationfortranslationalresearch