Cargando…

Comparison of two electronic hand hygiene systems using real-time feedback via wireless technology to improve hand hygiene compliance in an intensive care unit

BACKGROUND: Most hand hygiene (HH) intervention studies use a quasi-experimental design, are primarily uncontrolled before-and-after studies, or are controlled before-and-after studies with a nonequivalent control group. Well-funded studies with improved designs and HH interventions are needed. OBJE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Generoso, José R., Casaroto, Eduardo, Neto, Ary Serpa, Prado, Marcelo, Gagliardi, Guilherme M., de Menezes, Fernando Gatti, Gonçalves, Priscila, Hohmann, Fábio Barlem, Olivato, Guilherme Benfatti, Gonçalves, Gustavo Potratz, Pereira, Andréa Marques, Xavier, Nathalia, Miguel, Marcelo Fernandes, da Silva Victor, Elivane, Edmond, Michael B., Marra, Alexandre R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9726596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36483415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2022.270
_version_ 1784844825020858368
author Generoso, José R.
Casaroto, Eduardo
Neto, Ary Serpa
Prado, Marcelo
Gagliardi, Guilherme M.
de Menezes, Fernando Gatti
Gonçalves, Priscila
Hohmann, Fábio Barlem
Olivato, Guilherme Benfatti
Gonçalves, Gustavo Potratz
Pereira, Andréa Marques
Xavier, Nathalia
Miguel, Marcelo Fernandes
da Silva Victor, Elivane
Edmond, Michael B.
Marra, Alexandre R.
author_facet Generoso, José R.
Casaroto, Eduardo
Neto, Ary Serpa
Prado, Marcelo
Gagliardi, Guilherme M.
de Menezes, Fernando Gatti
Gonçalves, Priscila
Hohmann, Fábio Barlem
Olivato, Guilherme Benfatti
Gonçalves, Gustavo Potratz
Pereira, Andréa Marques
Xavier, Nathalia
Miguel, Marcelo Fernandes
da Silva Victor, Elivane
Edmond, Michael B.
Marra, Alexandre R.
author_sort Generoso, José R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most hand hygiene (HH) intervention studies use a quasi-experimental design, are primarily uncontrolled before-and-after studies, or are controlled before-and-after studies with a nonequivalent control group. Well-funded studies with improved designs and HH interventions are needed. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate healthcare worker (HCW) HH compliance with alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) through direct observation (human observer), 2 electronic technologies, a radio frequency identification (RFID) badge system, and an invasive device sensor. METHODS: In our controlled experimental study, 2,269 observations were made over a 6-month period from July 1 to December 30, 2020, in a 4-bed intensive care unit. We compared HH compliance between a basic feedback loop system with RFID badges and an enhanced feedback loop system that utilized sensors on invasive devices. RESULTS: Real-time feedback by wireless technology connected to a patient’s invasive device (enhanced feedback loop) resulted in a significant increase in HH compliance (69.5% in the enhanced group vs 59.1% in the basic group; P = .0001). CONCLUSION: An enhanced feedback loop system connected to invasive devices, providing real-time alerts to HCWs, is effective in improving HH compliance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9726596
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97265962022-12-07 Comparison of two electronic hand hygiene systems using real-time feedback via wireless technology to improve hand hygiene compliance in an intensive care unit Generoso, José R. Casaroto, Eduardo Neto, Ary Serpa Prado, Marcelo Gagliardi, Guilherme M. de Menezes, Fernando Gatti Gonçalves, Priscila Hohmann, Fábio Barlem Olivato, Guilherme Benfatti Gonçalves, Gustavo Potratz Pereira, Andréa Marques Xavier, Nathalia Miguel, Marcelo Fernandes da Silva Victor, Elivane Edmond, Michael B. Marra, Alexandre R. Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol Original Article BACKGROUND: Most hand hygiene (HH) intervention studies use a quasi-experimental design, are primarily uncontrolled before-and-after studies, or are controlled before-and-after studies with a nonequivalent control group. Well-funded studies with improved designs and HH interventions are needed. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate healthcare worker (HCW) HH compliance with alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) through direct observation (human observer), 2 electronic technologies, a radio frequency identification (RFID) badge system, and an invasive device sensor. METHODS: In our controlled experimental study, 2,269 observations were made over a 6-month period from July 1 to December 30, 2020, in a 4-bed intensive care unit. We compared HH compliance between a basic feedback loop system with RFID badges and an enhanced feedback loop system that utilized sensors on invasive devices. RESULTS: Real-time feedback by wireless technology connected to a patient’s invasive device (enhanced feedback loop) resulted in a significant increase in HH compliance (69.5% in the enhanced group vs 59.1% in the basic group; P = .0001). CONCLUSION: An enhanced feedback loop system connected to invasive devices, providing real-time alerts to HCWs, is effective in improving HH compliance. Cambridge University Press 2022-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9726596/ /pubmed/36483415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2022.270 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Generoso, José R.
Casaroto, Eduardo
Neto, Ary Serpa
Prado, Marcelo
Gagliardi, Guilherme M.
de Menezes, Fernando Gatti
Gonçalves, Priscila
Hohmann, Fábio Barlem
Olivato, Guilherme Benfatti
Gonçalves, Gustavo Potratz
Pereira, Andréa Marques
Xavier, Nathalia
Miguel, Marcelo Fernandes
da Silva Victor, Elivane
Edmond, Michael B.
Marra, Alexandre R.
Comparison of two electronic hand hygiene systems using real-time feedback via wireless technology to improve hand hygiene compliance in an intensive care unit
title Comparison of two electronic hand hygiene systems using real-time feedback via wireless technology to improve hand hygiene compliance in an intensive care unit
title_full Comparison of two electronic hand hygiene systems using real-time feedback via wireless technology to improve hand hygiene compliance in an intensive care unit
title_fullStr Comparison of two electronic hand hygiene systems using real-time feedback via wireless technology to improve hand hygiene compliance in an intensive care unit
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two electronic hand hygiene systems using real-time feedback via wireless technology to improve hand hygiene compliance in an intensive care unit
title_short Comparison of two electronic hand hygiene systems using real-time feedback via wireless technology to improve hand hygiene compliance in an intensive care unit
title_sort comparison of two electronic hand hygiene systems using real-time feedback via wireless technology to improve hand hygiene compliance in an intensive care unit
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9726596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36483415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2022.270
work_keys_str_mv AT generosojoser comparisonoftwoelectronichandhygienesystemsusingrealtimefeedbackviawirelesstechnologytoimprovehandhygienecomplianceinanintensivecareunit
AT casarotoeduardo comparisonoftwoelectronichandhygienesystemsusingrealtimefeedbackviawirelesstechnologytoimprovehandhygienecomplianceinanintensivecareunit
AT netoaryserpa comparisonoftwoelectronichandhygienesystemsusingrealtimefeedbackviawirelesstechnologytoimprovehandhygienecomplianceinanintensivecareunit
AT pradomarcelo comparisonoftwoelectronichandhygienesystemsusingrealtimefeedbackviawirelesstechnologytoimprovehandhygienecomplianceinanintensivecareunit
AT gagliardiguilhermem comparisonoftwoelectronichandhygienesystemsusingrealtimefeedbackviawirelesstechnologytoimprovehandhygienecomplianceinanintensivecareunit
AT demenezesfernandogatti comparisonoftwoelectronichandhygienesystemsusingrealtimefeedbackviawirelesstechnologytoimprovehandhygienecomplianceinanintensivecareunit
AT goncalvespriscila comparisonoftwoelectronichandhygienesystemsusingrealtimefeedbackviawirelesstechnologytoimprovehandhygienecomplianceinanintensivecareunit
AT hohmannfabiobarlem comparisonoftwoelectronichandhygienesystemsusingrealtimefeedbackviawirelesstechnologytoimprovehandhygienecomplianceinanintensivecareunit
AT olivatoguilhermebenfatti comparisonoftwoelectronichandhygienesystemsusingrealtimefeedbackviawirelesstechnologytoimprovehandhygienecomplianceinanintensivecareunit
AT goncalvesgustavopotratz comparisonoftwoelectronichandhygienesystemsusingrealtimefeedbackviawirelesstechnologytoimprovehandhygienecomplianceinanintensivecareunit
AT pereiraandreamarques comparisonoftwoelectronichandhygienesystemsusingrealtimefeedbackviawirelesstechnologytoimprovehandhygienecomplianceinanintensivecareunit
AT xaviernathalia comparisonoftwoelectronichandhygienesystemsusingrealtimefeedbackviawirelesstechnologytoimprovehandhygienecomplianceinanintensivecareunit
AT miguelmarcelofernandes comparisonoftwoelectronichandhygienesystemsusingrealtimefeedbackviawirelesstechnologytoimprovehandhygienecomplianceinanintensivecareunit
AT dasilvavictorelivane comparisonoftwoelectronichandhygienesystemsusingrealtimefeedbackviawirelesstechnologytoimprovehandhygienecomplianceinanintensivecareunit
AT edmondmichaelb comparisonoftwoelectronichandhygienesystemsusingrealtimefeedbackviawirelesstechnologytoimprovehandhygienecomplianceinanintensivecareunit
AT marraalexandrer comparisonoftwoelectronichandhygienesystemsusingrealtimefeedbackviawirelesstechnologytoimprovehandhygienecomplianceinanintensivecareunit