Cargando…
Comparison of two electronic hand hygiene systems using real-time feedback via wireless technology to improve hand hygiene compliance in an intensive care unit
BACKGROUND: Most hand hygiene (HH) intervention studies use a quasi-experimental design, are primarily uncontrolled before-and-after studies, or are controlled before-and-after studies with a nonequivalent control group. Well-funded studies with improved designs and HH interventions are needed. OBJE...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9726596/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36483415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2022.270 |
_version_ | 1784844825020858368 |
---|---|
author | Generoso, José R. Casaroto, Eduardo Neto, Ary Serpa Prado, Marcelo Gagliardi, Guilherme M. de Menezes, Fernando Gatti Gonçalves, Priscila Hohmann, Fábio Barlem Olivato, Guilherme Benfatti Gonçalves, Gustavo Potratz Pereira, Andréa Marques Xavier, Nathalia Miguel, Marcelo Fernandes da Silva Victor, Elivane Edmond, Michael B. Marra, Alexandre R. |
author_facet | Generoso, José R. Casaroto, Eduardo Neto, Ary Serpa Prado, Marcelo Gagliardi, Guilherme M. de Menezes, Fernando Gatti Gonçalves, Priscila Hohmann, Fábio Barlem Olivato, Guilherme Benfatti Gonçalves, Gustavo Potratz Pereira, Andréa Marques Xavier, Nathalia Miguel, Marcelo Fernandes da Silva Victor, Elivane Edmond, Michael B. Marra, Alexandre R. |
author_sort | Generoso, José R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Most hand hygiene (HH) intervention studies use a quasi-experimental design, are primarily uncontrolled before-and-after studies, or are controlled before-and-after studies with a nonequivalent control group. Well-funded studies with improved designs and HH interventions are needed. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate healthcare worker (HCW) HH compliance with alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) through direct observation (human observer), 2 electronic technologies, a radio frequency identification (RFID) badge system, and an invasive device sensor. METHODS: In our controlled experimental study, 2,269 observations were made over a 6-month period from July 1 to December 30, 2020, in a 4-bed intensive care unit. We compared HH compliance between a basic feedback loop system with RFID badges and an enhanced feedback loop system that utilized sensors on invasive devices. RESULTS: Real-time feedback by wireless technology connected to a patient’s invasive device (enhanced feedback loop) resulted in a significant increase in HH compliance (69.5% in the enhanced group vs 59.1% in the basic group; P = .0001). CONCLUSION: An enhanced feedback loop system connected to invasive devices, providing real-time alerts to HCWs, is effective in improving HH compliance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9726596 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97265962022-12-07 Comparison of two electronic hand hygiene systems using real-time feedback via wireless technology to improve hand hygiene compliance in an intensive care unit Generoso, José R. Casaroto, Eduardo Neto, Ary Serpa Prado, Marcelo Gagliardi, Guilherme M. de Menezes, Fernando Gatti Gonçalves, Priscila Hohmann, Fábio Barlem Olivato, Guilherme Benfatti Gonçalves, Gustavo Potratz Pereira, Andréa Marques Xavier, Nathalia Miguel, Marcelo Fernandes da Silva Victor, Elivane Edmond, Michael B. Marra, Alexandre R. Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol Original Article BACKGROUND: Most hand hygiene (HH) intervention studies use a quasi-experimental design, are primarily uncontrolled before-and-after studies, or are controlled before-and-after studies with a nonequivalent control group. Well-funded studies with improved designs and HH interventions are needed. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate healthcare worker (HCW) HH compliance with alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) through direct observation (human observer), 2 electronic technologies, a radio frequency identification (RFID) badge system, and an invasive device sensor. METHODS: In our controlled experimental study, 2,269 observations were made over a 6-month period from July 1 to December 30, 2020, in a 4-bed intensive care unit. We compared HH compliance between a basic feedback loop system with RFID badges and an enhanced feedback loop system that utilized sensors on invasive devices. RESULTS: Real-time feedback by wireless technology connected to a patient’s invasive device (enhanced feedback loop) resulted in a significant increase in HH compliance (69.5% in the enhanced group vs 59.1% in the basic group; P = .0001). CONCLUSION: An enhanced feedback loop system connected to invasive devices, providing real-time alerts to HCWs, is effective in improving HH compliance. Cambridge University Press 2022-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9726596/ /pubmed/36483415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2022.270 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Generoso, José R. Casaroto, Eduardo Neto, Ary Serpa Prado, Marcelo Gagliardi, Guilherme M. de Menezes, Fernando Gatti Gonçalves, Priscila Hohmann, Fábio Barlem Olivato, Guilherme Benfatti Gonçalves, Gustavo Potratz Pereira, Andréa Marques Xavier, Nathalia Miguel, Marcelo Fernandes da Silva Victor, Elivane Edmond, Michael B. Marra, Alexandre R. Comparison of two electronic hand hygiene systems using real-time feedback via wireless technology to improve hand hygiene compliance in an intensive care unit |
title | Comparison of two electronic hand hygiene systems using real-time feedback via wireless technology to improve hand hygiene compliance in an intensive care unit |
title_full | Comparison of two electronic hand hygiene systems using real-time feedback via wireless technology to improve hand hygiene compliance in an intensive care unit |
title_fullStr | Comparison of two electronic hand hygiene systems using real-time feedback via wireless technology to improve hand hygiene compliance in an intensive care unit |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of two electronic hand hygiene systems using real-time feedback via wireless technology to improve hand hygiene compliance in an intensive care unit |
title_short | Comparison of two electronic hand hygiene systems using real-time feedback via wireless technology to improve hand hygiene compliance in an intensive care unit |
title_sort | comparison of two electronic hand hygiene systems using real-time feedback via wireless technology to improve hand hygiene compliance in an intensive care unit |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9726596/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36483415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2022.270 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT generosojoser comparisonoftwoelectronichandhygienesystemsusingrealtimefeedbackviawirelesstechnologytoimprovehandhygienecomplianceinanintensivecareunit AT casarotoeduardo comparisonoftwoelectronichandhygienesystemsusingrealtimefeedbackviawirelesstechnologytoimprovehandhygienecomplianceinanintensivecareunit AT netoaryserpa comparisonoftwoelectronichandhygienesystemsusingrealtimefeedbackviawirelesstechnologytoimprovehandhygienecomplianceinanintensivecareunit AT pradomarcelo comparisonoftwoelectronichandhygienesystemsusingrealtimefeedbackviawirelesstechnologytoimprovehandhygienecomplianceinanintensivecareunit AT gagliardiguilhermem comparisonoftwoelectronichandhygienesystemsusingrealtimefeedbackviawirelesstechnologytoimprovehandhygienecomplianceinanintensivecareunit AT demenezesfernandogatti comparisonoftwoelectronichandhygienesystemsusingrealtimefeedbackviawirelesstechnologytoimprovehandhygienecomplianceinanintensivecareunit AT goncalvespriscila comparisonoftwoelectronichandhygienesystemsusingrealtimefeedbackviawirelesstechnologytoimprovehandhygienecomplianceinanintensivecareunit AT hohmannfabiobarlem comparisonoftwoelectronichandhygienesystemsusingrealtimefeedbackviawirelesstechnologytoimprovehandhygienecomplianceinanintensivecareunit AT olivatoguilhermebenfatti comparisonoftwoelectronichandhygienesystemsusingrealtimefeedbackviawirelesstechnologytoimprovehandhygienecomplianceinanintensivecareunit AT goncalvesgustavopotratz comparisonoftwoelectronichandhygienesystemsusingrealtimefeedbackviawirelesstechnologytoimprovehandhygienecomplianceinanintensivecareunit AT pereiraandreamarques comparisonoftwoelectronichandhygienesystemsusingrealtimefeedbackviawirelesstechnologytoimprovehandhygienecomplianceinanintensivecareunit AT xaviernathalia comparisonoftwoelectronichandhygienesystemsusingrealtimefeedbackviawirelesstechnologytoimprovehandhygienecomplianceinanintensivecareunit AT miguelmarcelofernandes comparisonoftwoelectronichandhygienesystemsusingrealtimefeedbackviawirelesstechnologytoimprovehandhygienecomplianceinanintensivecareunit AT dasilvavictorelivane comparisonoftwoelectronichandhygienesystemsusingrealtimefeedbackviawirelesstechnologytoimprovehandhygienecomplianceinanintensivecareunit AT edmondmichaelb comparisonoftwoelectronichandhygienesystemsusingrealtimefeedbackviawirelesstechnologytoimprovehandhygienecomplianceinanintensivecareunit AT marraalexandrer comparisonoftwoelectronichandhygienesystemsusingrealtimefeedbackviawirelesstechnologytoimprovehandhygienecomplianceinanintensivecareunit |