Cargando…

Migration behaviour of 2 clinically excellent cementless stems with different design rationales: 5-year follow-up of a randomised RSA-study

INTRODUCTION: Excellent long-term survival has been reported for both the Taperloc and the Mallory-Head cementless stems. However, little is known about the migration behaviour of these stems which have different design rationales. The purpose of this randomised clinical trial was to compare the mig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Voort, Paul, van Delft, Danny, Valstar, Edward R, Kaptein, Bart L, Fiocco, Marta, Nelissen, Rob GHH
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9726743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33596116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1120700021995482
_version_ 1784844855685414912
author van der Voort, Paul
van Delft, Danny
Valstar, Edward R
Kaptein, Bart L
Fiocco, Marta
Nelissen, Rob GHH
author_facet van der Voort, Paul
van Delft, Danny
Valstar, Edward R
Kaptein, Bart L
Fiocco, Marta
Nelissen, Rob GHH
author_sort van der Voort, Paul
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Excellent long-term survival has been reported for both the Taperloc and the Mallory-Head cementless stems. However, little is known about the migration behaviour of these stems which have different design rationales. The purpose of this randomised clinical trial was to compare the migration and clinical outcomes of these stems during 5 years of follow-up. METHODS: 42 consecutive hips in 38 patients scheduled to receive cementless THA were randomised to either a Taperloc or a Mallory-Head stem. Evaluation took place preoperatively and postoperatively on the second day, at 6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks, and annually thereafter. Primary outcome was stem migration measured using roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) and secondary outcomes were the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). No patients were lost to follow-up; in 1 patient the THA was removed due to deep infection 3 months postoperatively. In 6 hips migration measurements were not possible due to insufficient marker configuration. RESULTS: Throughout the follow-up period of 5 years, 3-dimensional migration was comparable between the Taperloc and the Mallory-Head stems (p-values > 0.05). However, at the 5-year follow-up point the retroversion of the Mallory-Head stem was 0.9° more than the Taperloc stem (p = 0.04). Initial subsidence and retroversion were respectively as large as 6.8 mm and 3.6° for the Taperloc stem and 5 mm and 3.6° for the Mallory-Head stem. After the first postoperative year, both implants had stabilised. The mean increment of HHS, as well as the SF-36 scores during the 5-year follow-up, were comparable between the 2 stems. CONCLUSIONS: The excellent long-term survival of both designs was confirmed in this study showing comparable initial migration with subsequent stabilisation. However, the Taperloc design with a flat, wedged geometry showed better rotational stability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9726743
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97267432022-12-08 Migration behaviour of 2 clinically excellent cementless stems with different design rationales: 5-year follow-up of a randomised RSA-study van der Voort, Paul van Delft, Danny Valstar, Edward R Kaptein, Bart L Fiocco, Marta Nelissen, Rob GHH Hip Int Original Research Articles INTRODUCTION: Excellent long-term survival has been reported for both the Taperloc and the Mallory-Head cementless stems. However, little is known about the migration behaviour of these stems which have different design rationales. The purpose of this randomised clinical trial was to compare the migration and clinical outcomes of these stems during 5 years of follow-up. METHODS: 42 consecutive hips in 38 patients scheduled to receive cementless THA were randomised to either a Taperloc or a Mallory-Head stem. Evaluation took place preoperatively and postoperatively on the second day, at 6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks, and annually thereafter. Primary outcome was stem migration measured using roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) and secondary outcomes were the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). No patients were lost to follow-up; in 1 patient the THA was removed due to deep infection 3 months postoperatively. In 6 hips migration measurements were not possible due to insufficient marker configuration. RESULTS: Throughout the follow-up period of 5 years, 3-dimensional migration was comparable between the Taperloc and the Mallory-Head stems (p-values > 0.05). However, at the 5-year follow-up point the retroversion of the Mallory-Head stem was 0.9° more than the Taperloc stem (p = 0.04). Initial subsidence and retroversion were respectively as large as 6.8 mm and 3.6° for the Taperloc stem and 5 mm and 3.6° for the Mallory-Head stem. After the first postoperative year, both implants had stabilised. The mean increment of HHS, as well as the SF-36 scores during the 5-year follow-up, were comparable between the 2 stems. CONCLUSIONS: The excellent long-term survival of both designs was confirmed in this study showing comparable initial migration with subsequent stabilisation. However, the Taperloc design with a flat, wedged geometry showed better rotational stability. SAGE Publications 2021-02-17 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9726743/ /pubmed/33596116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1120700021995482 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
van der Voort, Paul
van Delft, Danny
Valstar, Edward R
Kaptein, Bart L
Fiocco, Marta
Nelissen, Rob GHH
Migration behaviour of 2 clinically excellent cementless stems with different design rationales: 5-year follow-up of a randomised RSA-study
title Migration behaviour of 2 clinically excellent cementless stems with different design rationales: 5-year follow-up of a randomised RSA-study
title_full Migration behaviour of 2 clinically excellent cementless stems with different design rationales: 5-year follow-up of a randomised RSA-study
title_fullStr Migration behaviour of 2 clinically excellent cementless stems with different design rationales: 5-year follow-up of a randomised RSA-study
title_full_unstemmed Migration behaviour of 2 clinically excellent cementless stems with different design rationales: 5-year follow-up of a randomised RSA-study
title_short Migration behaviour of 2 clinically excellent cementless stems with different design rationales: 5-year follow-up of a randomised RSA-study
title_sort migration behaviour of 2 clinically excellent cementless stems with different design rationales: 5-year follow-up of a randomised rsa-study
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9726743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33596116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1120700021995482
work_keys_str_mv AT vandervoortpaul migrationbehaviourof2clinicallyexcellentcementlessstemswithdifferentdesignrationales5yearfollowupofarandomisedrsastudy
AT vandelftdanny migrationbehaviourof2clinicallyexcellentcementlessstemswithdifferentdesignrationales5yearfollowupofarandomisedrsastudy
AT valstaredwardr migrationbehaviourof2clinicallyexcellentcementlessstemswithdifferentdesignrationales5yearfollowupofarandomisedrsastudy
AT kapteinbartl migrationbehaviourof2clinicallyexcellentcementlessstemswithdifferentdesignrationales5yearfollowupofarandomisedrsastudy
AT fioccomarta migrationbehaviourof2clinicallyexcellentcementlessstemswithdifferentdesignrationales5yearfollowupofarandomisedrsastudy
AT nelissenrobghh migrationbehaviourof2clinicallyexcellentcementlessstemswithdifferentdesignrationales5yearfollowupofarandomisedrsastudy