Cargando…

Contrast-Enhanced Radiologic Evaluation of Gastric Conduit Emptying After Esophagectomy

BACKGROUND: Nasogastric tube (NGT) insertion is the standard of care in many hospitals after esophagectomy for gastric conduit decompression. An upper gastrointestinal contrast passage evaluation (UGI-CE) is a diagnostic test to evaluate passage through the gastric conduit. The authors hypothesized...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feenstra, Minke L., Alkemade, Lily, van den Bergh, Janneke E., Gisbertz, Suzanne S., Daams, Freek, van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I., Eshuis, Wietse J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9726779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36210402
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12596-9
_version_ 1784844864474578944
author Feenstra, Minke L.
Alkemade, Lily
van den Bergh, Janneke E.
Gisbertz, Suzanne S.
Daams, Freek
van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I.
Eshuis, Wietse J.
author_facet Feenstra, Minke L.
Alkemade, Lily
van den Bergh, Janneke E.
Gisbertz, Suzanne S.
Daams, Freek
van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I.
Eshuis, Wietse J.
author_sort Feenstra, Minke L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nasogastric tube (NGT) insertion is the standard of care in many hospitals after esophagectomy for gastric conduit decompression. An upper gastrointestinal contrast passage evaluation (UGI-CE) is a diagnostic test to evaluate passage through the gastric conduit. The authors hypothesized that introducing routine UGI-CE after esophagectomy results in earlier removal of the NGT and resumption of oral intake. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated two consecutive series of patients undergoing esophagectomy, one before (control group) and one after the introduction of a routine UGI-CE on postoperative day (POD) 3 or 4 (UGI-CE group). If contrast passage was found on the UGI-CE, the NGT was capped and removed. In the control group, the NGT was routinely capped and removed on day 5 after surgery. The primary outcome was the POD on which oral diet was initiated. The secondary outcomes were the day of NGT removal, NGT reinsertions, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Each cohort included 74 patients. In the UGI-CE group, the contrast test was performed on median POD 3.5 (IQR, 3–4). The median day of NGT removal, initiation of clear liquids, and full liquid and solid intake was 1 to 2 days earlier in the UGI-CE group than in the control group (i.e. POD 4, 4, 5, and 6 vs. POD 5, 5, 6.5, and 8; all p < 0.001). The study found no significant differences in NGT reinsertions, pneumonias, anastomotic leakages, or hospital stay. CONCLUSION: The routine use of a UGI-CE after esophagectomy led to earlier removal of the NGT and earlier resumption of oral intake.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9726779
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97267792022-12-08 Contrast-Enhanced Radiologic Evaluation of Gastric Conduit Emptying After Esophagectomy Feenstra, Minke L. Alkemade, Lily van den Bergh, Janneke E. Gisbertz, Suzanne S. Daams, Freek van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I. Eshuis, Wietse J. Ann Surg Oncol Thoracic Oncology BACKGROUND: Nasogastric tube (NGT) insertion is the standard of care in many hospitals after esophagectomy for gastric conduit decompression. An upper gastrointestinal contrast passage evaluation (UGI-CE) is a diagnostic test to evaluate passage through the gastric conduit. The authors hypothesized that introducing routine UGI-CE after esophagectomy results in earlier removal of the NGT and resumption of oral intake. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated two consecutive series of patients undergoing esophagectomy, one before (control group) and one after the introduction of a routine UGI-CE on postoperative day (POD) 3 or 4 (UGI-CE group). If contrast passage was found on the UGI-CE, the NGT was capped and removed. In the control group, the NGT was routinely capped and removed on day 5 after surgery. The primary outcome was the POD on which oral diet was initiated. The secondary outcomes were the day of NGT removal, NGT reinsertions, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Each cohort included 74 patients. In the UGI-CE group, the contrast test was performed on median POD 3.5 (IQR, 3–4). The median day of NGT removal, initiation of clear liquids, and full liquid and solid intake was 1 to 2 days earlier in the UGI-CE group than in the control group (i.e. POD 4, 4, 5, and 6 vs. POD 5, 5, 6.5, and 8; all p < 0.001). The study found no significant differences in NGT reinsertions, pneumonias, anastomotic leakages, or hospital stay. CONCLUSION: The routine use of a UGI-CE after esophagectomy led to earlier removal of the NGT and earlier resumption of oral intake. Springer International Publishing 2022-10-10 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9726779/ /pubmed/36210402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12596-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Thoracic Oncology
Feenstra, Minke L.
Alkemade, Lily
van den Bergh, Janneke E.
Gisbertz, Suzanne S.
Daams, Freek
van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I.
Eshuis, Wietse J.
Contrast-Enhanced Radiologic Evaluation of Gastric Conduit Emptying After Esophagectomy
title Contrast-Enhanced Radiologic Evaluation of Gastric Conduit Emptying After Esophagectomy
title_full Contrast-Enhanced Radiologic Evaluation of Gastric Conduit Emptying After Esophagectomy
title_fullStr Contrast-Enhanced Radiologic Evaluation of Gastric Conduit Emptying After Esophagectomy
title_full_unstemmed Contrast-Enhanced Radiologic Evaluation of Gastric Conduit Emptying After Esophagectomy
title_short Contrast-Enhanced Radiologic Evaluation of Gastric Conduit Emptying After Esophagectomy
title_sort contrast-enhanced radiologic evaluation of gastric conduit emptying after esophagectomy
topic Thoracic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9726779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36210402
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12596-9
work_keys_str_mv AT feenstraminkel contrastenhancedradiologicevaluationofgastricconduitemptyingafteresophagectomy
AT alkemadelily contrastenhancedradiologicevaluationofgastricconduitemptyingafteresophagectomy
AT vandenberghjannekee contrastenhancedradiologicevaluationofgastricconduitemptyingafteresophagectomy
AT gisbertzsuzannes contrastenhancedradiologicevaluationofgastricconduitemptyingafteresophagectomy
AT daamsfreek contrastenhancedradiologicevaluationofgastricconduitemptyingafteresophagectomy
AT vanbergehenegouwenmarki contrastenhancedradiologicevaluationofgastricconduitemptyingafteresophagectomy
AT eshuiswietsej contrastenhancedradiologicevaluationofgastricconduitemptyingafteresophagectomy