Cargando…
Contrast-Enhanced Radiologic Evaluation of Gastric Conduit Emptying After Esophagectomy
BACKGROUND: Nasogastric tube (NGT) insertion is the standard of care in many hospitals after esophagectomy for gastric conduit decompression. An upper gastrointestinal contrast passage evaluation (UGI-CE) is a diagnostic test to evaluate passage through the gastric conduit. The authors hypothesized...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9726779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36210402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12596-9 |
_version_ | 1784844864474578944 |
---|---|
author | Feenstra, Minke L. Alkemade, Lily van den Bergh, Janneke E. Gisbertz, Suzanne S. Daams, Freek van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I. Eshuis, Wietse J. |
author_facet | Feenstra, Minke L. Alkemade, Lily van den Bergh, Janneke E. Gisbertz, Suzanne S. Daams, Freek van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I. Eshuis, Wietse J. |
author_sort | Feenstra, Minke L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Nasogastric tube (NGT) insertion is the standard of care in many hospitals after esophagectomy for gastric conduit decompression. An upper gastrointestinal contrast passage evaluation (UGI-CE) is a diagnostic test to evaluate passage through the gastric conduit. The authors hypothesized that introducing routine UGI-CE after esophagectomy results in earlier removal of the NGT and resumption of oral intake. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated two consecutive series of patients undergoing esophagectomy, one before (control group) and one after the introduction of a routine UGI-CE on postoperative day (POD) 3 or 4 (UGI-CE group). If contrast passage was found on the UGI-CE, the NGT was capped and removed. In the control group, the NGT was routinely capped and removed on day 5 after surgery. The primary outcome was the POD on which oral diet was initiated. The secondary outcomes were the day of NGT removal, NGT reinsertions, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Each cohort included 74 patients. In the UGI-CE group, the contrast test was performed on median POD 3.5 (IQR, 3–4). The median day of NGT removal, initiation of clear liquids, and full liquid and solid intake was 1 to 2 days earlier in the UGI-CE group than in the control group (i.e. POD 4, 4, 5, and 6 vs. POD 5, 5, 6.5, and 8; all p < 0.001). The study found no significant differences in NGT reinsertions, pneumonias, anastomotic leakages, or hospital stay. CONCLUSION: The routine use of a UGI-CE after esophagectomy led to earlier removal of the NGT and earlier resumption of oral intake. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9726779 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97267792022-12-08 Contrast-Enhanced Radiologic Evaluation of Gastric Conduit Emptying After Esophagectomy Feenstra, Minke L. Alkemade, Lily van den Bergh, Janneke E. Gisbertz, Suzanne S. Daams, Freek van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I. Eshuis, Wietse J. Ann Surg Oncol Thoracic Oncology BACKGROUND: Nasogastric tube (NGT) insertion is the standard of care in many hospitals after esophagectomy for gastric conduit decompression. An upper gastrointestinal contrast passage evaluation (UGI-CE) is a diagnostic test to evaluate passage through the gastric conduit. The authors hypothesized that introducing routine UGI-CE after esophagectomy results in earlier removal of the NGT and resumption of oral intake. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated two consecutive series of patients undergoing esophagectomy, one before (control group) and one after the introduction of a routine UGI-CE on postoperative day (POD) 3 or 4 (UGI-CE group). If contrast passage was found on the UGI-CE, the NGT was capped and removed. In the control group, the NGT was routinely capped and removed on day 5 after surgery. The primary outcome was the POD on which oral diet was initiated. The secondary outcomes were the day of NGT removal, NGT reinsertions, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Each cohort included 74 patients. In the UGI-CE group, the contrast test was performed on median POD 3.5 (IQR, 3–4). The median day of NGT removal, initiation of clear liquids, and full liquid and solid intake was 1 to 2 days earlier in the UGI-CE group than in the control group (i.e. POD 4, 4, 5, and 6 vs. POD 5, 5, 6.5, and 8; all p < 0.001). The study found no significant differences in NGT reinsertions, pneumonias, anastomotic leakages, or hospital stay. CONCLUSION: The routine use of a UGI-CE after esophagectomy led to earlier removal of the NGT and earlier resumption of oral intake. Springer International Publishing 2022-10-10 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9726779/ /pubmed/36210402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12596-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Thoracic Oncology Feenstra, Minke L. Alkemade, Lily van den Bergh, Janneke E. Gisbertz, Suzanne S. Daams, Freek van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I. Eshuis, Wietse J. Contrast-Enhanced Radiologic Evaluation of Gastric Conduit Emptying After Esophagectomy |
title | Contrast-Enhanced Radiologic Evaluation of Gastric Conduit Emptying After Esophagectomy |
title_full | Contrast-Enhanced Radiologic Evaluation of Gastric Conduit Emptying After Esophagectomy |
title_fullStr | Contrast-Enhanced Radiologic Evaluation of Gastric Conduit Emptying After Esophagectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Contrast-Enhanced Radiologic Evaluation of Gastric Conduit Emptying After Esophagectomy |
title_short | Contrast-Enhanced Radiologic Evaluation of Gastric Conduit Emptying After Esophagectomy |
title_sort | contrast-enhanced radiologic evaluation of gastric conduit emptying after esophagectomy |
topic | Thoracic Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9726779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36210402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12596-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT feenstraminkel contrastenhancedradiologicevaluationofgastricconduitemptyingafteresophagectomy AT alkemadelily contrastenhancedradiologicevaluationofgastricconduitemptyingafteresophagectomy AT vandenberghjannekee contrastenhancedradiologicevaluationofgastricconduitemptyingafteresophagectomy AT gisbertzsuzannes contrastenhancedradiologicevaluationofgastricconduitemptyingafteresophagectomy AT daamsfreek contrastenhancedradiologicevaluationofgastricconduitemptyingafteresophagectomy AT vanbergehenegouwenmarki contrastenhancedradiologicevaluationofgastricconduitemptyingafteresophagectomy AT eshuiswietsej contrastenhancedradiologicevaluationofgastricconduitemptyingafteresophagectomy |