Cargando…
Assessing life-space mobility: A systematic review of questionnaires and their psychometric properties
BACKGROUND: Life-space mobility (LSM), as the extent of mobility within one’s environment, is a key for successful aging and has become a relevant concept in gerontology and geriatric research. Adequate assessment instruments are needed to identify older persons with LSM restrictions, and to initiat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Medizin
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9726808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35244765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00391-022-02035-5 |
_version_ | 1784844870287884288 |
---|---|
author | Ullrich, Phoebe Werner, Christian Abel, Bastian Hummel, Merit Bauer, Jürgen M. Hauer, Klaus |
author_facet | Ullrich, Phoebe Werner, Christian Abel, Bastian Hummel, Merit Bauer, Jürgen M. Hauer, Klaus |
author_sort | Ullrich, Phoebe |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Life-space mobility (LSM), as the extent of mobility within one’s environment, is a key for successful aging and has become a relevant concept in gerontology and geriatric research. Adequate assessment instruments are needed to identify older persons with LSM restrictions, and to initiate, adapt or evaluate intervention strategies. OBJECTIVE: To systematically identify, describe and analyze the psychometric properties of LSM questionnaires, with a special focus on their availability in the German language. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Web of Science. Studies that examined at least one psychometric property of LSM questionnaires published up to August 2021 were included and evaluated based on the consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) guidelines. RESULTS: This study included 37 validation studies describing 13 different LSM questionnaires. Methodological quality and comprehensiveness of validations were heterogeneous. Based on comprehensive and high-quality results, four LSM questionnaires stood out: the University of Alabama at Birmingham life-space assessment (UAB-LSA), life-space assessment in persons with cognitive impairment (LSA-CI), interview-based and proxy-based versions of the life-space assessment in institutionalized settings (LSA-IS), all of them available in the German language. CONCLUSION: This systematic review provides a concise overview of available LSM questionnaires and their psychometric properties to facilitate the selection for use in clinical practice and research. The UAB-LSA and LSA-CI for community settings and the interview-based or proxy-based LSA-IS for institutional settings were found to be the most appropriate LSM questionnaires. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00391-022-02035-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9726808 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Medizin |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97268082022-12-08 Assessing life-space mobility: A systematic review of questionnaires and their psychometric properties Ullrich, Phoebe Werner, Christian Abel, Bastian Hummel, Merit Bauer, Jürgen M. Hauer, Klaus Z Gerontol Geriatr Reviews BACKGROUND: Life-space mobility (LSM), as the extent of mobility within one’s environment, is a key for successful aging and has become a relevant concept in gerontology and geriatric research. Adequate assessment instruments are needed to identify older persons with LSM restrictions, and to initiate, adapt or evaluate intervention strategies. OBJECTIVE: To systematically identify, describe and analyze the psychometric properties of LSM questionnaires, with a special focus on their availability in the German language. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Web of Science. Studies that examined at least one psychometric property of LSM questionnaires published up to August 2021 were included and evaluated based on the consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) guidelines. RESULTS: This study included 37 validation studies describing 13 different LSM questionnaires. Methodological quality and comprehensiveness of validations were heterogeneous. Based on comprehensive and high-quality results, four LSM questionnaires stood out: the University of Alabama at Birmingham life-space assessment (UAB-LSA), life-space assessment in persons with cognitive impairment (LSA-CI), interview-based and proxy-based versions of the life-space assessment in institutionalized settings (LSA-IS), all of them available in the German language. CONCLUSION: This systematic review provides a concise overview of available LSM questionnaires and their psychometric properties to facilitate the selection for use in clinical practice and research. The UAB-LSA and LSA-CI for community settings and the interview-based or proxy-based LSA-IS for institutional settings were found to be the most appropriate LSM questionnaires. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00391-022-02035-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Medizin 2022-03-04 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9726808/ /pubmed/35244765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00391-022-02035-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Reviews Ullrich, Phoebe Werner, Christian Abel, Bastian Hummel, Merit Bauer, Jürgen M. Hauer, Klaus Assessing life-space mobility: A systematic review of questionnaires and their psychometric properties |
title | Assessing life-space mobility: A systematic review of questionnaires and their psychometric properties |
title_full | Assessing life-space mobility: A systematic review of questionnaires and their psychometric properties |
title_fullStr | Assessing life-space mobility: A systematic review of questionnaires and their psychometric properties |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing life-space mobility: A systematic review of questionnaires and their psychometric properties |
title_short | Assessing life-space mobility: A systematic review of questionnaires and their psychometric properties |
title_sort | assessing life-space mobility: a systematic review of questionnaires and their psychometric properties |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9726808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35244765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00391-022-02035-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ullrichphoebe assessinglifespacemobilityasystematicreviewofquestionnairesandtheirpsychometricproperties AT wernerchristian assessinglifespacemobilityasystematicreviewofquestionnairesandtheirpsychometricproperties AT abelbastian assessinglifespacemobilityasystematicreviewofquestionnairesandtheirpsychometricproperties AT hummelmerit assessinglifespacemobilityasystematicreviewofquestionnairesandtheirpsychometricproperties AT bauerjurgenm assessinglifespacemobilityasystematicreviewofquestionnairesandtheirpsychometricproperties AT hauerklaus assessinglifespacemobilityasystematicreviewofquestionnairesandtheirpsychometricproperties |