Cargando…

Underutilisation of no-tobacco-sale orders against retailers that repeatedly sell to minors, 2015–2019, USA

IMPORTANCE: Research demonstrates that policies aimed at retailers who sell to minors must be strongly enforced to have an impact on youth usage rates. OBJECTIVES: In the USA, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) conducts compliance checks, issues fines, and can order retailers to stop selling tob...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hemmerich, Natalie, Jenson, Desmond, Bowrey, Brice L, Lee, Joseph G L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9726953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34103419
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056379
_version_ 1784844906752114688
author Hemmerich, Natalie
Jenson, Desmond
Bowrey, Brice L
Lee, Joseph G L
author_facet Hemmerich, Natalie
Jenson, Desmond
Bowrey, Brice L
Lee, Joseph G L
author_sort Hemmerich, Natalie
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Research demonstrates that policies aimed at retailers who sell to minors must be strongly enforced to have an impact on youth usage rates. OBJECTIVES: In the USA, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) conducts compliance checks, issues fines, and can order retailers to stop selling tobacco products (ie, no-tobacco-sale orders (NTSOs)) to enforce the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. We sought to assess FDA’s utilisation of NTSOs. METHODS: We conducted a quantitative content analysis of FDA’s enforcement actions for inspections decided between 1 October 2015 and 29 March 2019. From the 536 134 inspection records we identified 148 NTSOs and 249 720 unique retailer locations, of which 2095 had three or more violations. We randomly sampled NTSOs (n=76) and retail locations (n=152) with frequent violations. We calculated the proportion of NTSOs that could have been issued earlier by FDA. We then calculated the proportion of retailers that could have been issued an NTSO, and the proportion actually issued an NTSO using FDA’s approach and a more stringent approach. RESULTS: Among NTSOs, 94.7% (95% CI: 89.8% to 97.4%) of NTSOs could have been issued earlier under a more stringent approach. On average, when an NTSO could have been issued earlier, it could have been issued 453 days earlier (95% CI: 418 to 489; range: 89–1159). Among frequently violating retail locations, 73.6% (95% CI: 66.0% to 80.0%) were eligible for an NTSO. Of those, 1.9% (95% CI: 0.5% to 7.0%) had received an NTSO. CONCLUSIONS: The FDA’s failure to fully leverage its powers to address retailers’ underage sales of tobacco products has weakened efforts to curb the youth e-cigarette epidemic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9726953
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97269532022-12-08 Underutilisation of no-tobacco-sale orders against retailers that repeatedly sell to minors, 2015–2019, USA Hemmerich, Natalie Jenson, Desmond Bowrey, Brice L Lee, Joseph G L Tob Control Original Research IMPORTANCE: Research demonstrates that policies aimed at retailers who sell to minors must be strongly enforced to have an impact on youth usage rates. OBJECTIVES: In the USA, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) conducts compliance checks, issues fines, and can order retailers to stop selling tobacco products (ie, no-tobacco-sale orders (NTSOs)) to enforce the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. We sought to assess FDA’s utilisation of NTSOs. METHODS: We conducted a quantitative content analysis of FDA’s enforcement actions for inspections decided between 1 October 2015 and 29 March 2019. From the 536 134 inspection records we identified 148 NTSOs and 249 720 unique retailer locations, of which 2095 had three or more violations. We randomly sampled NTSOs (n=76) and retail locations (n=152) with frequent violations. We calculated the proportion of NTSOs that could have been issued earlier by FDA. We then calculated the proportion of retailers that could have been issued an NTSO, and the proportion actually issued an NTSO using FDA’s approach and a more stringent approach. RESULTS: Among NTSOs, 94.7% (95% CI: 89.8% to 97.4%) of NTSOs could have been issued earlier under a more stringent approach. On average, when an NTSO could have been issued earlier, it could have been issued 453 days earlier (95% CI: 418 to 489; range: 89–1159). Among frequently violating retail locations, 73.6% (95% CI: 66.0% to 80.0%) were eligible for an NTSO. Of those, 1.9% (95% CI: 0.5% to 7.0%) had received an NTSO. CONCLUSIONS: The FDA’s failure to fully leverage its powers to address retailers’ underage sales of tobacco products has weakened efforts to curb the youth e-cigarette epidemic. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-12 2021-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9726953/ /pubmed/34103419 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056379 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Hemmerich, Natalie
Jenson, Desmond
Bowrey, Brice L
Lee, Joseph G L
Underutilisation of no-tobacco-sale orders against retailers that repeatedly sell to minors, 2015–2019, USA
title Underutilisation of no-tobacco-sale orders against retailers that repeatedly sell to minors, 2015–2019, USA
title_full Underutilisation of no-tobacco-sale orders against retailers that repeatedly sell to minors, 2015–2019, USA
title_fullStr Underutilisation of no-tobacco-sale orders against retailers that repeatedly sell to minors, 2015–2019, USA
title_full_unstemmed Underutilisation of no-tobacco-sale orders against retailers that repeatedly sell to minors, 2015–2019, USA
title_short Underutilisation of no-tobacco-sale orders against retailers that repeatedly sell to minors, 2015–2019, USA
title_sort underutilisation of no-tobacco-sale orders against retailers that repeatedly sell to minors, 2015–2019, usa
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9726953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34103419
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056379
work_keys_str_mv AT hemmerichnatalie underutilisationofnotobaccosaleordersagainstretailersthatrepeatedlyselltominors20152019usa
AT jensondesmond underutilisationofnotobaccosaleordersagainstretailersthatrepeatedlyselltominors20152019usa
AT bowreybricel underutilisationofnotobaccosaleordersagainstretailersthatrepeatedlyselltominors20152019usa
AT leejosephgl underutilisationofnotobaccosaleordersagainstretailersthatrepeatedlyselltominors20152019usa