Cargando…
Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of circumferential spine stereotactic body radiotherapy
BACKGROUND: With advances in systemic therapy translating to improved survival in metastatic malignancies, spine metastases have become an increasingly common source of morbidity. Achieving durable local control (LC) for patients with circumferential epidural disease can be particularly challenging....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9727181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36505845 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.912799 |
_version_ | 1784844953334054912 |
---|---|
author | Dibs, Khaled Palmer, Joshua D. Prasad, Rahul N. Olausson, Alexander Bourekas, Eric C. Boulter, Daniel Ayan, Ahmet S. Cochran, Eric Marras, William S. Mageswaran, Prasath Thomas, Evan Grecula, John Guiou, Michael Soghrati, Soheil Tili, Esmerina Raval, Raju R. Mendel, Ehud Scharschmidt, Thomas Elder, James B. Lonser, Russell Chakravarti, Arnab Blakaj, Dukagjin M. |
author_facet | Dibs, Khaled Palmer, Joshua D. Prasad, Rahul N. Olausson, Alexander Bourekas, Eric C. Boulter, Daniel Ayan, Ahmet S. Cochran, Eric Marras, William S. Mageswaran, Prasath Thomas, Evan Grecula, John Guiou, Michael Soghrati, Soheil Tili, Esmerina Raval, Raju R. Mendel, Ehud Scharschmidt, Thomas Elder, James B. Lonser, Russell Chakravarti, Arnab Blakaj, Dukagjin M. |
author_sort | Dibs, Khaled |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: With advances in systemic therapy translating to improved survival in metastatic malignancies, spine metastases have become an increasingly common source of morbidity. Achieving durable local control (LC) for patients with circumferential epidural disease can be particularly challenging. Circumferential stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may offer improved LC for circumferential vertebral and/or epidural metastatic spinal disease, but prospective (and retrospective) data are extremely limited. We sought to evaluate the feasibility, toxicity, and cancer control outcomes with this novel approach to circumferential spinal disease. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all circumferential SBRT courses delivered between 2013 and 2019 at a tertiary care institution for post-operative or intact spine metastases. Radiotherapy was delivered to 14–27.5 Gy in one to five fractions. Feasibility was assessed by determining the proportion of plans for which ≥95% planning target volume (PTV) was coverable by ≥95% prescription dose. The primary endpoint was 1-year LC. Factors associated with increased likelihood of local failure (LF) were explored. Acute and chronic toxicity were assessed. Detailed dosimetric data were collected. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients receiving 64 circumferential SBRT courses were identified (median age 61, KPS ≥70, 57% men). With a median follow-up of 15 months, the 12-month local control was 85% (eight events). Five and three recurrences were in the epidural space and bone, respectively. On multivariate analysis, increased PTV and uncontrolled systemic disease were significantly associated with an increased likelihood of LF; ≥95% PTV was covered by ≥95% prescription dose in 94% of the cases. The rate of new or progressive vertebral compression fracture was 8%. There were no myelitis events or any grade 3+ acute or late toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with circumferential disease, circumferential spine SBRT is feasible and may offer excellent LC without significant toxicity. A prospective evaluation of this approach is warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9727181 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97271812022-12-08 Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of circumferential spine stereotactic body radiotherapy Dibs, Khaled Palmer, Joshua D. Prasad, Rahul N. Olausson, Alexander Bourekas, Eric C. Boulter, Daniel Ayan, Ahmet S. Cochran, Eric Marras, William S. Mageswaran, Prasath Thomas, Evan Grecula, John Guiou, Michael Soghrati, Soheil Tili, Esmerina Raval, Raju R. Mendel, Ehud Scharschmidt, Thomas Elder, James B. Lonser, Russell Chakravarti, Arnab Blakaj, Dukagjin M. Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: With advances in systemic therapy translating to improved survival in metastatic malignancies, spine metastases have become an increasingly common source of morbidity. Achieving durable local control (LC) for patients with circumferential epidural disease can be particularly challenging. Circumferential stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may offer improved LC for circumferential vertebral and/or epidural metastatic spinal disease, but prospective (and retrospective) data are extremely limited. We sought to evaluate the feasibility, toxicity, and cancer control outcomes with this novel approach to circumferential spinal disease. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all circumferential SBRT courses delivered between 2013 and 2019 at a tertiary care institution for post-operative or intact spine metastases. Radiotherapy was delivered to 14–27.5 Gy in one to five fractions. Feasibility was assessed by determining the proportion of plans for which ≥95% planning target volume (PTV) was coverable by ≥95% prescription dose. The primary endpoint was 1-year LC. Factors associated with increased likelihood of local failure (LF) were explored. Acute and chronic toxicity were assessed. Detailed dosimetric data were collected. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients receiving 64 circumferential SBRT courses were identified (median age 61, KPS ≥70, 57% men). With a median follow-up of 15 months, the 12-month local control was 85% (eight events). Five and three recurrences were in the epidural space and bone, respectively. On multivariate analysis, increased PTV and uncontrolled systemic disease were significantly associated with an increased likelihood of LF; ≥95% PTV was covered by ≥95% prescription dose in 94% of the cases. The rate of new or progressive vertebral compression fracture was 8%. There were no myelitis events or any grade 3+ acute or late toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with circumferential disease, circumferential spine SBRT is feasible and may offer excellent LC without significant toxicity. A prospective evaluation of this approach is warranted. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9727181/ /pubmed/36505845 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.912799 Text en Copyright © 2022 Dibs, Palmer, Prasad, Olausson, Bourekas, Boulter, Ayan, Cochran, Marras, Mageswaran, Thomas, Grecula, Guiou, Soghrati, Tili, Raval, Mendel, Scharschmidt, Elder, Lonser, Chakravarti and Blakaj https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Dibs, Khaled Palmer, Joshua D. Prasad, Rahul N. Olausson, Alexander Bourekas, Eric C. Boulter, Daniel Ayan, Ahmet S. Cochran, Eric Marras, William S. Mageswaran, Prasath Thomas, Evan Grecula, John Guiou, Michael Soghrati, Soheil Tili, Esmerina Raval, Raju R. Mendel, Ehud Scharschmidt, Thomas Elder, James B. Lonser, Russell Chakravarti, Arnab Blakaj, Dukagjin M. Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of circumferential spine stereotactic body radiotherapy |
title | Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of circumferential spine stereotactic body radiotherapy |
title_full | Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of circumferential spine stereotactic body radiotherapy |
title_fullStr | Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of circumferential spine stereotactic body radiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of circumferential spine stereotactic body radiotherapy |
title_short | Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of circumferential spine stereotactic body radiotherapy |
title_sort | feasibility, safety, and efficacy of circumferential spine stereotactic body radiotherapy |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9727181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36505845 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.912799 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dibskhaled feasibilitysafetyandefficacyofcircumferentialspinestereotacticbodyradiotherapy AT palmerjoshuad feasibilitysafetyandefficacyofcircumferentialspinestereotacticbodyradiotherapy AT prasadrahuln feasibilitysafetyandefficacyofcircumferentialspinestereotacticbodyradiotherapy AT olaussonalexander feasibilitysafetyandefficacyofcircumferentialspinestereotacticbodyradiotherapy AT bourekasericc feasibilitysafetyandefficacyofcircumferentialspinestereotacticbodyradiotherapy AT boulterdaniel feasibilitysafetyandefficacyofcircumferentialspinestereotacticbodyradiotherapy AT ayanahmets feasibilitysafetyandefficacyofcircumferentialspinestereotacticbodyradiotherapy AT cochraneric feasibilitysafetyandefficacyofcircumferentialspinestereotacticbodyradiotherapy AT marraswilliams feasibilitysafetyandefficacyofcircumferentialspinestereotacticbodyradiotherapy AT mageswaranprasath feasibilitysafetyandefficacyofcircumferentialspinestereotacticbodyradiotherapy AT thomasevan feasibilitysafetyandefficacyofcircumferentialspinestereotacticbodyradiotherapy AT greculajohn feasibilitysafetyandefficacyofcircumferentialspinestereotacticbodyradiotherapy AT guioumichael feasibilitysafetyandefficacyofcircumferentialspinestereotacticbodyradiotherapy AT soghratisoheil feasibilitysafetyandefficacyofcircumferentialspinestereotacticbodyradiotherapy AT tiliesmerina feasibilitysafetyandefficacyofcircumferentialspinestereotacticbodyradiotherapy AT ravalrajur feasibilitysafetyandefficacyofcircumferentialspinestereotacticbodyradiotherapy AT mendelehud feasibilitysafetyandefficacyofcircumferentialspinestereotacticbodyradiotherapy AT scharschmidtthomas feasibilitysafetyandefficacyofcircumferentialspinestereotacticbodyradiotherapy AT elderjamesb feasibilitysafetyandefficacyofcircumferentialspinestereotacticbodyradiotherapy AT lonserrussell feasibilitysafetyandefficacyofcircumferentialspinestereotacticbodyradiotherapy AT chakravartiarnab feasibilitysafetyandefficacyofcircumferentialspinestereotacticbodyradiotherapy AT blakajdukagjinm feasibilitysafetyandefficacyofcircumferentialspinestereotacticbodyradiotherapy |