Cargando…

We Should Pay More Attention to Sex Differences to Predict the Risk of Severe COVID-19: Men Have the Same Risk of Worse Prognosis as Women More Than 10 Years Older

BACKGROUND: Prioritization for novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related health policies usually considers age and certain other characteristics, but sex is rarely included, despite the higher risk of severe disease in men. The aim of this study was to compare the impact of sex and age on th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matsushita, Yumi, Yokoyama, Tetsuji, Hayakawa, Kayoko, Matsunaga, Nobuaki, Ohtsu, Hiroshi, Saito, Sho, Terada, Mari, Suzuki, Setsuko, Morioka, Shinichiro, Kutsuna, Satoshi, Tsuzuki, Shinya, Hara, Hisao, Kimura, Akio, Ohmagari, Norio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Japan Epidemiological Association 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9727213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35851563
http://dx.doi.org/10.2188/jea.JE20220056
_version_ 1784844961839054848
author Matsushita, Yumi
Yokoyama, Tetsuji
Hayakawa, Kayoko
Matsunaga, Nobuaki
Ohtsu, Hiroshi
Saito, Sho
Terada, Mari
Suzuki, Setsuko
Morioka, Shinichiro
Kutsuna, Satoshi
Tsuzuki, Shinya
Hara, Hisao
Kimura, Akio
Ohmagari, Norio
author_facet Matsushita, Yumi
Yokoyama, Tetsuji
Hayakawa, Kayoko
Matsunaga, Nobuaki
Ohtsu, Hiroshi
Saito, Sho
Terada, Mari
Suzuki, Setsuko
Morioka, Shinichiro
Kutsuna, Satoshi
Tsuzuki, Shinya
Hara, Hisao
Kimura, Akio
Ohmagari, Norio
author_sort Matsushita, Yumi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prioritization for novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related health policies usually considers age and certain other characteristics, but sex is rarely included, despite the higher risk of severe disease in men. The aim of this study was to compare the impact of sex and age on the severity of COVID-19 by estimating the age difference in years for which the risk for men versus women is the same. METHODS: We analyzed 23,414 Japanese COVID-19 inpatients aged 20–89 years (13,360 men and 10,054 women). We graded the severity of COVID-19 (0 to 5) according to the most intensive treatment required during hospitalization. The risk of grade 2/3/4/5 (non-invasive positive pressure ventilation/invasive mechanical ventilation/extracorporeal membrane oxygenation/death), grade 3/4/5, and separately grade 5 was analyzed using a multiple logistic regression model. RESULTS: The odds ratio (OR) of grades 2/3/4/5, 3/4/5 (primary outcome), and 5 for men relative to women was 2.76 (95% CI, 2.44–3.12), 2.78 (95% CI, 2.42–3.19), and 2.60 (95% CI, 2.23–3.03), respectively, after adjustment for age and date of admission. These risks for men were equivalent to those for women 14.1 (95% CI, 12.3–15.8), 11.2 (95% CI, 9.7–12.8), and 7.5 (95% CI, 6.3–8.7) years older, respectively. CONCLUSION: The risks of worse COVID-19 prognosis (grades 3/4/5) in men were equivalent to those of women 11.2 years older. Reanalyzing data extracted from four previous studies also revealed a large impact of sex difference on the severity of COVID-19. We should pay more attention to sex differences to predict the risk of COVID-19 severity and to formulate public health policy accordingly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9727213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Japan Epidemiological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97272132023-01-05 We Should Pay More Attention to Sex Differences to Predict the Risk of Severe COVID-19: Men Have the Same Risk of Worse Prognosis as Women More Than 10 Years Older Matsushita, Yumi Yokoyama, Tetsuji Hayakawa, Kayoko Matsunaga, Nobuaki Ohtsu, Hiroshi Saito, Sho Terada, Mari Suzuki, Setsuko Morioka, Shinichiro Kutsuna, Satoshi Tsuzuki, Shinya Hara, Hisao Kimura, Akio Ohmagari, Norio J Epidemiol Original Article BACKGROUND: Prioritization for novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related health policies usually considers age and certain other characteristics, but sex is rarely included, despite the higher risk of severe disease in men. The aim of this study was to compare the impact of sex and age on the severity of COVID-19 by estimating the age difference in years for which the risk for men versus women is the same. METHODS: We analyzed 23,414 Japanese COVID-19 inpatients aged 20–89 years (13,360 men and 10,054 women). We graded the severity of COVID-19 (0 to 5) according to the most intensive treatment required during hospitalization. The risk of grade 2/3/4/5 (non-invasive positive pressure ventilation/invasive mechanical ventilation/extracorporeal membrane oxygenation/death), grade 3/4/5, and separately grade 5 was analyzed using a multiple logistic regression model. RESULTS: The odds ratio (OR) of grades 2/3/4/5, 3/4/5 (primary outcome), and 5 for men relative to women was 2.76 (95% CI, 2.44–3.12), 2.78 (95% CI, 2.42–3.19), and 2.60 (95% CI, 2.23–3.03), respectively, after adjustment for age and date of admission. These risks for men were equivalent to those for women 14.1 (95% CI, 12.3–15.8), 11.2 (95% CI, 9.7–12.8), and 7.5 (95% CI, 6.3–8.7) years older, respectively. CONCLUSION: The risks of worse COVID-19 prognosis (grades 3/4/5) in men were equivalent to those of women 11.2 years older. Reanalyzing data extracted from four previous studies also revealed a large impact of sex difference on the severity of COVID-19. We should pay more attention to sex differences to predict the risk of COVID-19 severity and to formulate public health policy accordingly. Japan Epidemiological Association 2023-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9727213/ /pubmed/35851563 http://dx.doi.org/10.2188/jea.JE20220056 Text en © 2022 Yumi Matsushita et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Matsushita, Yumi
Yokoyama, Tetsuji
Hayakawa, Kayoko
Matsunaga, Nobuaki
Ohtsu, Hiroshi
Saito, Sho
Terada, Mari
Suzuki, Setsuko
Morioka, Shinichiro
Kutsuna, Satoshi
Tsuzuki, Shinya
Hara, Hisao
Kimura, Akio
Ohmagari, Norio
We Should Pay More Attention to Sex Differences to Predict the Risk of Severe COVID-19: Men Have the Same Risk of Worse Prognosis as Women More Than 10 Years Older
title We Should Pay More Attention to Sex Differences to Predict the Risk of Severe COVID-19: Men Have the Same Risk of Worse Prognosis as Women More Than 10 Years Older
title_full We Should Pay More Attention to Sex Differences to Predict the Risk of Severe COVID-19: Men Have the Same Risk of Worse Prognosis as Women More Than 10 Years Older
title_fullStr We Should Pay More Attention to Sex Differences to Predict the Risk of Severe COVID-19: Men Have the Same Risk of Worse Prognosis as Women More Than 10 Years Older
title_full_unstemmed We Should Pay More Attention to Sex Differences to Predict the Risk of Severe COVID-19: Men Have the Same Risk of Worse Prognosis as Women More Than 10 Years Older
title_short We Should Pay More Attention to Sex Differences to Predict the Risk of Severe COVID-19: Men Have the Same Risk of Worse Prognosis as Women More Than 10 Years Older
title_sort we should pay more attention to sex differences to predict the risk of severe covid-19: men have the same risk of worse prognosis as women more than 10 years older
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9727213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35851563
http://dx.doi.org/10.2188/jea.JE20220056
work_keys_str_mv AT matsushitayumi weshouldpaymoreattentiontosexdifferencestopredicttheriskofseverecovid19menhavethesameriskofworseprognosisaswomenmorethan10yearsolder
AT yokoyamatetsuji weshouldpaymoreattentiontosexdifferencestopredicttheriskofseverecovid19menhavethesameriskofworseprognosisaswomenmorethan10yearsolder
AT hayakawakayoko weshouldpaymoreattentiontosexdifferencestopredicttheriskofseverecovid19menhavethesameriskofworseprognosisaswomenmorethan10yearsolder
AT matsunaganobuaki weshouldpaymoreattentiontosexdifferencestopredicttheriskofseverecovid19menhavethesameriskofworseprognosisaswomenmorethan10yearsolder
AT ohtsuhiroshi weshouldpaymoreattentiontosexdifferencestopredicttheriskofseverecovid19menhavethesameriskofworseprognosisaswomenmorethan10yearsolder
AT saitosho weshouldpaymoreattentiontosexdifferencestopredicttheriskofseverecovid19menhavethesameriskofworseprognosisaswomenmorethan10yearsolder
AT teradamari weshouldpaymoreattentiontosexdifferencestopredicttheriskofseverecovid19menhavethesameriskofworseprognosisaswomenmorethan10yearsolder
AT suzukisetsuko weshouldpaymoreattentiontosexdifferencestopredicttheriskofseverecovid19menhavethesameriskofworseprognosisaswomenmorethan10yearsolder
AT moriokashinichiro weshouldpaymoreattentiontosexdifferencestopredicttheriskofseverecovid19menhavethesameriskofworseprognosisaswomenmorethan10yearsolder
AT kutsunasatoshi weshouldpaymoreattentiontosexdifferencestopredicttheriskofseverecovid19menhavethesameriskofworseprognosisaswomenmorethan10yearsolder
AT tsuzukishinya weshouldpaymoreattentiontosexdifferencestopredicttheriskofseverecovid19menhavethesameriskofworseprognosisaswomenmorethan10yearsolder
AT harahisao weshouldpaymoreattentiontosexdifferencestopredicttheriskofseverecovid19menhavethesameriskofworseprognosisaswomenmorethan10yearsolder
AT kimuraakio weshouldpaymoreattentiontosexdifferencestopredicttheriskofseverecovid19menhavethesameriskofworseprognosisaswomenmorethan10yearsolder
AT ohmagarinorio weshouldpaymoreattentiontosexdifferencestopredicttheriskofseverecovid19menhavethesameriskofworseprognosisaswomenmorethan10yearsolder