Cargando…

Fastball pitching performance only slightly decreases after mobility impediment of the pelvis and trunk—Do (catch-up) compensation strategies come into play?

BACKGROUND: Baseball pitching performance can be mechanically explained by the summation of speed principle and the principle of optimal coordination of partial momenta. Impeding optimal energy generation or transfer by or between the pelvis and trunk segments could provide valuable insight into pos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leenen, A. J. R., van Trigt, Bart, Hoozemans, M. J. M., Veeger, H. E. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9727238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36506720
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.1044616
_version_ 1784844968503803904
author Leenen, A. J. R.
van Trigt, Bart
Hoozemans, M. J. M.
Veeger, H. E. J.
author_facet Leenen, A. J. R.
van Trigt, Bart
Hoozemans, M. J. M.
Veeger, H. E. J.
author_sort Leenen, A. J. R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Baseball pitching performance can be mechanically explained by the summation of speed principle and the principle of optimal coordination of partial momenta. Impeding optimal energy generation or transfer by or between the pelvis and trunk segments could provide valuable insight into possible compensation or catch-up mechanisms that may manifest themselves based on these principles. AIM: The aim of the present study was to explore the effects of experimentally impeding the mobility of and between the pelvis and trunk segments (1) on ball speed and mechanical peak joint power, and (2) on mechanical peak load of the elbow and shoulder joints at maximal external rotation (MER) during fastball pitching. METHODS: Eleven elite baseball pitchers (mean age 17.4, SD 2.2 years; mean pitching experience 8.9, SD 3.0 years) were instructed to throw at least 15 fastballs as fast and accurately as possible under two conditions. One condition involved impeding the mobility of the pelvis and trunk segments to hamper their ability to rotate independently, which consequently should affect the separation time, defined as the time interval between the pelvis and trunk peak angular velocities. In the other condition, pitchers threw unimpeded. Ball speed, mechanical peak joint power and peak net moment of the elbow and shoulder at MER were compared between conditions using Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE). RESULTS: In the impeded pitching condition, the mean difference of the separation time was 12.4 milliseconds [95% CI (4.0, 20.7)] and for ball speed 0.6 mph [95% CI (0.2, 0.9)] lower compared to the unimpeded condition. Only the peak pelvic angular velocity, in addition to the trunk, upper arm and forearm, was 45 deg/s [95% CI (24, 66)] higher impeded condition. The mean differences of the joint power and net moments at the shoulder and elbow did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: In elite adolescent baseball, the observed pitching performance after experimentally impeding pelvic and trunk mobility undermines a potential distal catch-up strategy based on the summation of speed principle. The increased peak pelvic angular velocity may indicate a compensation strategy following the optimal coordination of partial momenta principle to practically maintain pitching performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9727238
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97272382022-12-08 Fastball pitching performance only slightly decreases after mobility impediment of the pelvis and trunk—Do (catch-up) compensation strategies come into play? Leenen, A. J. R. van Trigt, Bart Hoozemans, M. J. M. Veeger, H. E. J. Front Sports Act Living Sports and Active Living BACKGROUND: Baseball pitching performance can be mechanically explained by the summation of speed principle and the principle of optimal coordination of partial momenta. Impeding optimal energy generation or transfer by or between the pelvis and trunk segments could provide valuable insight into possible compensation or catch-up mechanisms that may manifest themselves based on these principles. AIM: The aim of the present study was to explore the effects of experimentally impeding the mobility of and between the pelvis and trunk segments (1) on ball speed and mechanical peak joint power, and (2) on mechanical peak load of the elbow and shoulder joints at maximal external rotation (MER) during fastball pitching. METHODS: Eleven elite baseball pitchers (mean age 17.4, SD 2.2 years; mean pitching experience 8.9, SD 3.0 years) were instructed to throw at least 15 fastballs as fast and accurately as possible under two conditions. One condition involved impeding the mobility of the pelvis and trunk segments to hamper their ability to rotate independently, which consequently should affect the separation time, defined as the time interval between the pelvis and trunk peak angular velocities. In the other condition, pitchers threw unimpeded. Ball speed, mechanical peak joint power and peak net moment of the elbow and shoulder at MER were compared between conditions using Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE). RESULTS: In the impeded pitching condition, the mean difference of the separation time was 12.4 milliseconds [95% CI (4.0, 20.7)] and for ball speed 0.6 mph [95% CI (0.2, 0.9)] lower compared to the unimpeded condition. Only the peak pelvic angular velocity, in addition to the trunk, upper arm and forearm, was 45 deg/s [95% CI (24, 66)] higher impeded condition. The mean differences of the joint power and net moments at the shoulder and elbow did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: In elite adolescent baseball, the observed pitching performance after experimentally impeding pelvic and trunk mobility undermines a potential distal catch-up strategy based on the summation of speed principle. The increased peak pelvic angular velocity may indicate a compensation strategy following the optimal coordination of partial momenta principle to practically maintain pitching performance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9727238/ /pubmed/36506720 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.1044616 Text en Copyright © 2022 Leenen, Trigt, Hoozemans and Veeger. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Sports and Active Living
Leenen, A. J. R.
van Trigt, Bart
Hoozemans, M. J. M.
Veeger, H. E. J.
Fastball pitching performance only slightly decreases after mobility impediment of the pelvis and trunk—Do (catch-up) compensation strategies come into play?
title Fastball pitching performance only slightly decreases after mobility impediment of the pelvis and trunk—Do (catch-up) compensation strategies come into play?
title_full Fastball pitching performance only slightly decreases after mobility impediment of the pelvis and trunk—Do (catch-up) compensation strategies come into play?
title_fullStr Fastball pitching performance only slightly decreases after mobility impediment of the pelvis and trunk—Do (catch-up) compensation strategies come into play?
title_full_unstemmed Fastball pitching performance only slightly decreases after mobility impediment of the pelvis and trunk—Do (catch-up) compensation strategies come into play?
title_short Fastball pitching performance only slightly decreases after mobility impediment of the pelvis and trunk—Do (catch-up) compensation strategies come into play?
title_sort fastball pitching performance only slightly decreases after mobility impediment of the pelvis and trunk—do (catch-up) compensation strategies come into play?
topic Sports and Active Living
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9727238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36506720
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.1044616
work_keys_str_mv AT leenenajr fastballpitchingperformanceonlyslightlydecreasesaftermobilityimpedimentofthepelvisandtrunkdocatchupcompensationstrategiescomeintoplay
AT vantrigtbart fastballpitchingperformanceonlyslightlydecreasesaftermobilityimpedimentofthepelvisandtrunkdocatchupcompensationstrategiescomeintoplay
AT hoozemansmjm fastballpitchingperformanceonlyslightlydecreasesaftermobilityimpedimentofthepelvisandtrunkdocatchupcompensationstrategiescomeintoplay
AT veegerhej fastballpitchingperformanceonlyslightlydecreasesaftermobilityimpedimentofthepelvisandtrunkdocatchupcompensationstrategiescomeintoplay