Cargando…

Assessing the quality of electronic medical records in academic hospitals: A multi-center study in Iran

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to assess the quality of electronic medical records (EMR) retrieved from hospital information systems (HIS) of three educational hospitals in Mashhad, Iran. METHODS: In this multi-center, cross-sectional study, inpatient electronic records collected from three acad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zabolinezhad, Hedieh, Eslami, Saeid, Hassibian, Mohammad Reza, Dorri, Sara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9727295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36506847
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.856010
_version_ 1784844983216373760
author Zabolinezhad, Hedieh
Eslami, Saeid
Hassibian, Mohammad Reza
Dorri, Sara
author_facet Zabolinezhad, Hedieh
Eslami, Saeid
Hassibian, Mohammad Reza
Dorri, Sara
author_sort Zabolinezhad, Hedieh
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to assess the quality of electronic medical records (EMR) retrieved from hospital information systems (HIS) of three educational hospitals in Mashhad, Iran. METHODS: In this multi-center, cross-sectional study, inpatient electronic records collected from three academic hospitals were categorized into five data groups, namely demographics (D); care handler (CH), indicating the doers of the medical actions; diagnosis and treatment (DT); administrative and financial (AF); and laboratory and Para clinic (LP). Next, we asked 25 physicians from the three academic hospitals to determine data elements of medical research and education value (called research and educational data) in every group. Flowingly, the quality of the five data groups (completeness * accuracy) was reported for entire sampled data and those specified as research and educational data, based on the exact concordance between electronic medical records and corresponding paper records. HISRA, standing for HIS recording ability, was also assessed compared to data elements of standard paper forms. RESULTS: For entire data, HISRA was 58.5%. In all hospitals, the highest data quality (more than 90%) belongs to D and AF data groups, and the lowest quality goes to CH and DT groups (less than 50%, and 60%, respectively). For research and educational data, HISRA was 47%, and the quality of D and AF data groups were the highest (nearly 100%), while CH and DT stood around 50% and 60% in order. The quality of the LP data group was almost 85% in all hospitals but hospital C (well over 30%). Total data quality for the hospitals was almost less than 70%. CONCLUSIONS: The low quality of electronic medical records was mostly a result of incompleteness, while the accuracy was relatively good. Results showed that the HIS application development mainly focused on administrative and financial aspects rather than academic and clinical goals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9727295
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97272952022-12-08 Assessing the quality of electronic medical records in academic hospitals: A multi-center study in Iran Zabolinezhad, Hedieh Eslami, Saeid Hassibian, Mohammad Reza Dorri, Sara Front Digit Health Digital Health OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to assess the quality of electronic medical records (EMR) retrieved from hospital information systems (HIS) of three educational hospitals in Mashhad, Iran. METHODS: In this multi-center, cross-sectional study, inpatient electronic records collected from three academic hospitals were categorized into five data groups, namely demographics (D); care handler (CH), indicating the doers of the medical actions; diagnosis and treatment (DT); administrative and financial (AF); and laboratory and Para clinic (LP). Next, we asked 25 physicians from the three academic hospitals to determine data elements of medical research and education value (called research and educational data) in every group. Flowingly, the quality of the five data groups (completeness * accuracy) was reported for entire sampled data and those specified as research and educational data, based on the exact concordance between electronic medical records and corresponding paper records. HISRA, standing for HIS recording ability, was also assessed compared to data elements of standard paper forms. RESULTS: For entire data, HISRA was 58.5%. In all hospitals, the highest data quality (more than 90%) belongs to D and AF data groups, and the lowest quality goes to CH and DT groups (less than 50%, and 60%, respectively). For research and educational data, HISRA was 47%, and the quality of D and AF data groups were the highest (nearly 100%), while CH and DT stood around 50% and 60% in order. The quality of the LP data group was almost 85% in all hospitals but hospital C (well over 30%). Total data quality for the hospitals was almost less than 70%. CONCLUSIONS: The low quality of electronic medical records was mostly a result of incompleteness, while the accuracy was relatively good. Results showed that the HIS application development mainly focused on administrative and financial aspects rather than academic and clinical goals. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9727295/ /pubmed/36506847 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.856010 Text en © 2022 Zabolinezhad, Eslami, Hasibian and Dorri. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Digital Health
Zabolinezhad, Hedieh
Eslami, Saeid
Hassibian, Mohammad Reza
Dorri, Sara
Assessing the quality of electronic medical records in academic hospitals: A multi-center study in Iran
title Assessing the quality of electronic medical records in academic hospitals: A multi-center study in Iran
title_full Assessing the quality of electronic medical records in academic hospitals: A multi-center study in Iran
title_fullStr Assessing the quality of electronic medical records in academic hospitals: A multi-center study in Iran
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the quality of electronic medical records in academic hospitals: A multi-center study in Iran
title_short Assessing the quality of electronic medical records in academic hospitals: A multi-center study in Iran
title_sort assessing the quality of electronic medical records in academic hospitals: a multi-center study in iran
topic Digital Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9727295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36506847
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.856010
work_keys_str_mv AT zabolinezhadhedieh assessingthequalityofelectronicmedicalrecordsinacademichospitalsamulticenterstudyiniran
AT eslamisaeid assessingthequalityofelectronicmedicalrecordsinacademichospitalsamulticenterstudyiniran
AT hassibianmohammadreza assessingthequalityofelectronicmedicalrecordsinacademichospitalsamulticenterstudyiniran
AT dorrisara assessingthequalityofelectronicmedicalrecordsinacademichospitalsamulticenterstudyiniran