Cargando…
Rare complications of Guideplus guide-extension catheter during complex percutaneous coronary intervention
Guide-extension catheters (GECs) are effective in providing reinforced backup support and coaxial alignment, leading to successful complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, several GEC-associated complications have been reported, including coronary injuries, thrombotic events, and G...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Japanese College of Cardiology
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9727552/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36506501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jccase.2022.08.006 |
_version_ | 1784845049082675200 |
---|---|
author | Shoda, Mitsuhiko Yamamoto, Hiroyuki Tsukiyama, Yoshiro Kawai, Hiroya Takaya, Tomofumi |
author_facet | Shoda, Mitsuhiko Yamamoto, Hiroyuki Tsukiyama, Yoshiro Kawai, Hiroya Takaya, Tomofumi |
author_sort | Shoda, Mitsuhiko |
collection | PubMed |
description | Guide-extension catheters (GECs) are effective in providing reinforced backup support and coaxial alignment, leading to successful complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, several GEC-associated complications have been reported, including coronary injuries, thrombotic events, and GEC fractures. The Guideplus GEC (Guideplus II ST; Nipro, Osaka, Japan) has a higher crossability due to its unique hydrophilic-coated soft cylinder, which is frequently used in complex PCI for diffuse, tortuous, and heavily calcified lesions. We describe two cases of Guideplus GEC-associated complications during complex PCI: Case 1 with a radiopaque marker dislodgement and Case 2 with a stent dislodgment. In both cases, the Guideplus GEC was used within 7-Fr guiding catheters, employing the mother-and-child technique. A large inner-catheter gap between these catheters caused by a positioning bias due to arterial bends (the aortic arch in Case 1 and brachiocephalic arterial bends in Case 2) may have caused these complications due to its interference with coronary devices (the trapping balloon in Case 1, and the scoring balloon in Case 2). Early cognition and management of these potential Guideplus GEC-associated complications are important to prevent further deterioration. LEARNING OBJECTIVES: The Guideplus guide-extension catheter (GEC) with a hydrophilic-coated soft cylinder can deliver coronary devices to complex lesions owing to its high crossability. However, delivering coronary devices with the Guideplus GEC should be carefully performed because a large inner-catheter gap between Guideplus GEC and a guiding catheter may occur if a proximal port of the Guideplus GEC is located at an arterial bend. In such settings, Guideplus GEC-associated complications must be carefully observed, including radiopaque marker dislodgement and stent dislodgement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9727552 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Japanese College of Cardiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97275522022-12-08 Rare complications of Guideplus guide-extension catheter during complex percutaneous coronary intervention Shoda, Mitsuhiko Yamamoto, Hiroyuki Tsukiyama, Yoshiro Kawai, Hiroya Takaya, Tomofumi J Cardiol Cases Case Report Guide-extension catheters (GECs) are effective in providing reinforced backup support and coaxial alignment, leading to successful complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, several GEC-associated complications have been reported, including coronary injuries, thrombotic events, and GEC fractures. The Guideplus GEC (Guideplus II ST; Nipro, Osaka, Japan) has a higher crossability due to its unique hydrophilic-coated soft cylinder, which is frequently used in complex PCI for diffuse, tortuous, and heavily calcified lesions. We describe two cases of Guideplus GEC-associated complications during complex PCI: Case 1 with a radiopaque marker dislodgement and Case 2 with a stent dislodgment. In both cases, the Guideplus GEC was used within 7-Fr guiding catheters, employing the mother-and-child technique. A large inner-catheter gap between these catheters caused by a positioning bias due to arterial bends (the aortic arch in Case 1 and brachiocephalic arterial bends in Case 2) may have caused these complications due to its interference with coronary devices (the trapping balloon in Case 1, and the scoring balloon in Case 2). Early cognition and management of these potential Guideplus GEC-associated complications are important to prevent further deterioration. LEARNING OBJECTIVES: The Guideplus guide-extension catheter (GEC) with a hydrophilic-coated soft cylinder can deliver coronary devices to complex lesions owing to its high crossability. However, delivering coronary devices with the Guideplus GEC should be carefully performed because a large inner-catheter gap between Guideplus GEC and a guiding catheter may occur if a proximal port of the Guideplus GEC is located at an arterial bend. In such settings, Guideplus GEC-associated complications must be carefully observed, including radiopaque marker dislodgement and stent dislodgement. Japanese College of Cardiology 2022-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9727552/ /pubmed/36506501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jccase.2022.08.006 Text en © 2022 Japanese College of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Case Report Shoda, Mitsuhiko Yamamoto, Hiroyuki Tsukiyama, Yoshiro Kawai, Hiroya Takaya, Tomofumi Rare complications of Guideplus guide-extension catheter during complex percutaneous coronary intervention |
title | Rare complications of Guideplus guide-extension catheter during complex percutaneous coronary intervention |
title_full | Rare complications of Guideplus guide-extension catheter during complex percutaneous coronary intervention |
title_fullStr | Rare complications of Guideplus guide-extension catheter during complex percutaneous coronary intervention |
title_full_unstemmed | Rare complications of Guideplus guide-extension catheter during complex percutaneous coronary intervention |
title_short | Rare complications of Guideplus guide-extension catheter during complex percutaneous coronary intervention |
title_sort | rare complications of guideplus guide-extension catheter during complex percutaneous coronary intervention |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9727552/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36506501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jccase.2022.08.006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shodamitsuhiko rarecomplicationsofguideplusguideextensioncatheterduringcomplexpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT yamamotohiroyuki rarecomplicationsofguideplusguideextensioncatheterduringcomplexpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT tsukiyamayoshiro rarecomplicationsofguideplusguideextensioncatheterduringcomplexpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT kawaihiroya rarecomplicationsofguideplusguideextensioncatheterduringcomplexpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT takayatomofumi rarecomplicationsofguideplusguideextensioncatheterduringcomplexpercutaneouscoronaryintervention |