Cargando…
Effects of camelina oil supplementation on lipid profile and glycemic control: a systematic review and dose‒response meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
BACKGROUND: This systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to determine the effectiveness of camelina oil supplementation (COS) on lipid profiles and glycemic indices. METHODS: Relevant RCTs were selected by searching the ISI Web...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9727906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36476379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12944-022-01745-4 |
_version_ | 1784845128626601984 |
---|---|
author | Jalili, Cyrus Talebi, Sepide Mehrabani, Sanaz Bagheri, Reza Wong, Alexei Amirian, Parsa Zarpoosh, Mahsa Ghoreishy, Seyed Mojtaba Kermani, Mohammad Ali Hojjati Moradi, Sajjad |
author_facet | Jalili, Cyrus Talebi, Sepide Mehrabani, Sanaz Bagheri, Reza Wong, Alexei Amirian, Parsa Zarpoosh, Mahsa Ghoreishy, Seyed Mojtaba Kermani, Mohammad Ali Hojjati Moradi, Sajjad |
author_sort | Jalili, Cyrus |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to determine the effectiveness of camelina oil supplementation (COS) on lipid profiles and glycemic indices. METHODS: Relevant RCTs were selected by searching the ISI Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus databases up to July 1, 2022. RTCs with an intervention duration of less than 2 weeks, without a placebo group, and those that used COS in combination with another supplement were excluded. Weighted mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were pooled by applying a random-effects model, while validated methods examined sensitivity analyses, heterogeneity, and publication bias. RESULTS: Seven eligible RCTs, including 428 individuals, were selected. The pooled analysis revealed that COS significantly improved total cholesterol in studies lasting more than 8 weeks and utilizing dosages lower than 30 g/d compared to the placebo group. The results of fractional polynomial modeling indicated that there were nonlinear dose–response relations between the dose of COS and absolute mean differences in low-density cholesterol, high-density cholesterol, and total cholesterol, but not triglycerides. It appears that the greatest effect of COS oil occurs at the dosage of 20 g/day. CONCLUSION: The present meta-analysis indicates that COS may reduce cardiovascular disease risk by improving lipid profile markers. Based on the results of this study, COS at dosages lower than 30 g/d may be a beneficial nonpharmacological strategy for lipid control. Further RCTs with longer COS durations are warranted to expand on these results. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12944-022-01745-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9727906 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97279062022-12-08 Effects of camelina oil supplementation on lipid profile and glycemic control: a systematic review and dose‒response meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials Jalili, Cyrus Talebi, Sepide Mehrabani, Sanaz Bagheri, Reza Wong, Alexei Amirian, Parsa Zarpoosh, Mahsa Ghoreishy, Seyed Mojtaba Kermani, Mohammad Ali Hojjati Moradi, Sajjad Lipids Health Dis Review BACKGROUND: This systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to determine the effectiveness of camelina oil supplementation (COS) on lipid profiles and glycemic indices. METHODS: Relevant RCTs were selected by searching the ISI Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus databases up to July 1, 2022. RTCs with an intervention duration of less than 2 weeks, without a placebo group, and those that used COS in combination with another supplement were excluded. Weighted mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were pooled by applying a random-effects model, while validated methods examined sensitivity analyses, heterogeneity, and publication bias. RESULTS: Seven eligible RCTs, including 428 individuals, were selected. The pooled analysis revealed that COS significantly improved total cholesterol in studies lasting more than 8 weeks and utilizing dosages lower than 30 g/d compared to the placebo group. The results of fractional polynomial modeling indicated that there were nonlinear dose–response relations between the dose of COS and absolute mean differences in low-density cholesterol, high-density cholesterol, and total cholesterol, but not triglycerides. It appears that the greatest effect of COS oil occurs at the dosage of 20 g/day. CONCLUSION: The present meta-analysis indicates that COS may reduce cardiovascular disease risk by improving lipid profile markers. Based on the results of this study, COS at dosages lower than 30 g/d may be a beneficial nonpharmacological strategy for lipid control. Further RCTs with longer COS durations are warranted to expand on these results. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12944-022-01745-4. BioMed Central 2022-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9727906/ /pubmed/36476379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12944-022-01745-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Jalili, Cyrus Talebi, Sepide Mehrabani, Sanaz Bagheri, Reza Wong, Alexei Amirian, Parsa Zarpoosh, Mahsa Ghoreishy, Seyed Mojtaba Kermani, Mohammad Ali Hojjati Moradi, Sajjad Effects of camelina oil supplementation on lipid profile and glycemic control: a systematic review and dose‒response meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials |
title | Effects of camelina oil supplementation on lipid profile and glycemic control: a systematic review and dose‒response meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials |
title_full | Effects of camelina oil supplementation on lipid profile and glycemic control: a systematic review and dose‒response meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials |
title_fullStr | Effects of camelina oil supplementation on lipid profile and glycemic control: a systematic review and dose‒response meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of camelina oil supplementation on lipid profile and glycemic control: a systematic review and dose‒response meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials |
title_short | Effects of camelina oil supplementation on lipid profile and glycemic control: a systematic review and dose‒response meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials |
title_sort | effects of camelina oil supplementation on lipid profile and glycemic control: a systematic review and dose‒response meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9727906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36476379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12944-022-01745-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jalilicyrus effectsofcamelinaoilsupplementationonlipidprofileandglycemiccontrolasystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT talebisepide effectsofcamelinaoilsupplementationonlipidprofileandglycemiccontrolasystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT mehrabanisanaz effectsofcamelinaoilsupplementationonlipidprofileandglycemiccontrolasystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT bagherireza effectsofcamelinaoilsupplementationonlipidprofileandglycemiccontrolasystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT wongalexei effectsofcamelinaoilsupplementationonlipidprofileandglycemiccontrolasystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT amirianparsa effectsofcamelinaoilsupplementationonlipidprofileandglycemiccontrolasystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT zarpooshmahsa effectsofcamelinaoilsupplementationonlipidprofileandglycemiccontrolasystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT ghoreishyseyedmojtaba effectsofcamelinaoilsupplementationonlipidprofileandglycemiccontrolasystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT kermanimohammadalihojjati effectsofcamelinaoilsupplementationonlipidprofileandglycemiccontrolasystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT moradisajjad effectsofcamelinaoilsupplementationonlipidprofileandglycemiccontrolasystematicreviewanddoseresponsemetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials |