Cargando…

Sugar-to-What? An Environmental Merit Order Curve for Biobased Chemicals and Plastics

[Image: see text] The chemical industry aims to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) by adopting biomass as a renewable carbon feedstock. However, biomass is a limited resource. Thus, biomass should preferentially be used in processes that most reduce GHG emissions. However, a lack of harmoniz...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Winter, Benedikt, Meys, Raoul, Sternberg, André, Bardow, André
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9727924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36507094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c03275
_version_ 1784845133170081792
author Winter, Benedikt
Meys, Raoul
Sternberg, André
Bardow, André
author_facet Winter, Benedikt
Meys, Raoul
Sternberg, André
Bardow, André
author_sort Winter, Benedikt
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] The chemical industry aims to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) by adopting biomass as a renewable carbon feedstock. However, biomass is a limited resource. Thus, biomass should preferentially be used in processes that most reduce GHG emissions. However, a lack of harmonization in current life cycle assessment (LCA) literature makes the identification of efficient processes difficult. In this study, 46 fermentation processes from literature are harmonized and analyzed on the basis of their GHG reduction compared with fossil benchmarks. The GHG reduction per amount of sugar used is defined as Sugar-to-X efficiency and used as a performance metric in the following. The analyzed processes span a wide range of Sugar-to-X efficiencies from −3.3 to 6.7 kg of CO(2) equiv per kg of sugar input. Diverting sugar from bioethanol production for fuels to the fermentation and bioconversion processes with the highest Sugar-to-X efficiency could reduce the chemical industry’s GHG emissions by an additional 130 MT of CO(2) equiv without requiring any more biobased feedstocks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9727924
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97279242022-12-08 Sugar-to-What? An Environmental Merit Order Curve for Biobased Chemicals and Plastics Winter, Benedikt Meys, Raoul Sternberg, André Bardow, André ACS Sustain Chem Eng [Image: see text] The chemical industry aims to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) by adopting biomass as a renewable carbon feedstock. However, biomass is a limited resource. Thus, biomass should preferentially be used in processes that most reduce GHG emissions. However, a lack of harmonization in current life cycle assessment (LCA) literature makes the identification of efficient processes difficult. In this study, 46 fermentation processes from literature are harmonized and analyzed on the basis of their GHG reduction compared with fossil benchmarks. The GHG reduction per amount of sugar used is defined as Sugar-to-X efficiency and used as a performance metric in the following. The analyzed processes span a wide range of Sugar-to-X efficiencies from −3.3 to 6.7 kg of CO(2) equiv per kg of sugar input. Diverting sugar from bioethanol production for fuels to the fermentation and bioconversion processes with the highest Sugar-to-X efficiency could reduce the chemical industry’s GHG emissions by an additional 130 MT of CO(2) equiv without requiring any more biobased feedstocks. American Chemical Society 2022-11-16 2022-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9727924/ /pubmed/36507094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c03275 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Winter, Benedikt
Meys, Raoul
Sternberg, André
Bardow, André
Sugar-to-What? An Environmental Merit Order Curve for Biobased Chemicals and Plastics
title Sugar-to-What? An Environmental Merit Order Curve for Biobased Chemicals and Plastics
title_full Sugar-to-What? An Environmental Merit Order Curve for Biobased Chemicals and Plastics
title_fullStr Sugar-to-What? An Environmental Merit Order Curve for Biobased Chemicals and Plastics
title_full_unstemmed Sugar-to-What? An Environmental Merit Order Curve for Biobased Chemicals and Plastics
title_short Sugar-to-What? An Environmental Merit Order Curve for Biobased Chemicals and Plastics
title_sort sugar-to-what? an environmental merit order curve for biobased chemicals and plastics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9727924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36507094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c03275
work_keys_str_mv AT winterbenedikt sugartowhatanenvironmentalmeritordercurveforbiobasedchemicalsandplastics
AT meysraoul sugartowhatanenvironmentalmeritordercurveforbiobasedchemicalsandplastics
AT sternbergandre sugartowhatanenvironmentalmeritordercurveforbiobasedchemicalsandplastics
AT bardowandre sugartowhatanenvironmentalmeritordercurveforbiobasedchemicalsandplastics