Cargando…

Air-Q ILA as a conduit for orotracheal intubation in children: A randomized control trial for comparison between supine and lateral patient positions

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Airway management in children is always challenging and becomes a concern if required in the lateral position. We evaluated the efficacy of orotracheal intubation using the Air-Q intubating laryngeal Airway (Air-Q ILA) in supine and lateral positions in children. MATERIAL AND ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pandey, Ravinder K., Sharma, Ankur, Garg, Rakesh, Depal, Vini, Punj, Jyotsna, Darlong, V, Sinha, Renu, Baidya, Dalim K., Subramanian, Rajkumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9728458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36505210
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_80_21
_version_ 1784845262255030272
author Pandey, Ravinder K.
Sharma, Ankur
Garg, Rakesh
Depal, Vini
Punj, Jyotsna
Darlong, V
Sinha, Renu
Baidya, Dalim K.
Subramanian, Rajkumar
author_facet Pandey, Ravinder K.
Sharma, Ankur
Garg, Rakesh
Depal, Vini
Punj, Jyotsna
Darlong, V
Sinha, Renu
Baidya, Dalim K.
Subramanian, Rajkumar
author_sort Pandey, Ravinder K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Airway management in children is always challenging and becomes a concern if required in the lateral position. We evaluated the efficacy of orotracheal intubation using the Air-Q intubating laryngeal Airway (Air-Q ILA) in supine and lateral positions in children. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study included 100 children weighing 7–30 kg, scheduled for elective surgeries under general anesthesia. They were randomized into the supine (S) group or lateral (L) group. After anesthesia induction, the child was placed in a standard sniffing position for conventional laryngoscopy in the S group, and the child was turned into the lateral position in the L group. Both Air-Q ILA and endotracheal tube were placed blindly in the supine position in the S group and lateral position in group L. The grading of glottic view, success rate, insertion time of the Air-Q ILA, and endotracheal intubation were noted in both the groups. RESULTS: The Air-Q ILA was successfully placed at the first attempt in 47 children in group S and 48 in group L. The overall blind orotracheal intubations, including first and second attempts, were successful in 45 children in the S group and 47 in the L group (P = 0.715). Eighty percent of patients in group L and 70% in group S had glottis grade 1 or 2 compared to grade 3, 4,5 (P = 0.249). The mean time of Air-Q ILA placement in groups S and L was 15.73 ± 5.64 s and 14.42 ± 4.16 s (P = 0.195). The mean duration of blind endotracheal intubation through the Air-Q ILA was 24.88 ± 14.75 s in group S and 17.57 ± 5.35 s in group L (P = 0.002). In both the groups, none of the children had bronchospasm, laryngospasm, desaturation, or aspiration. The airway trauma evident by blood staining on the Air-Q ILA on removal was revealed in 2 cases in group S, and 3 cases in group L. None of the children in group S and 4 children in group L had postoperative stridor. Postoperative hoarseness was reported in 3 children in group S and none in group L within 24 hours. CONCLUSION: The Air-Q ILA can be used as a conduit for blind orotracheal intubation in children in both supine and lateral positions while maintaining an effective airway seal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9728458
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97284582022-12-08 Air-Q ILA as a conduit for orotracheal intubation in children: A randomized control trial for comparison between supine and lateral patient positions Pandey, Ravinder K. Sharma, Ankur Garg, Rakesh Depal, Vini Punj, Jyotsna Darlong, V Sinha, Renu Baidya, Dalim K. Subramanian, Rajkumar J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Airway management in children is always challenging and becomes a concern if required in the lateral position. We evaluated the efficacy of orotracheal intubation using the Air-Q intubating laryngeal Airway (Air-Q ILA) in supine and lateral positions in children. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study included 100 children weighing 7–30 kg, scheduled for elective surgeries under general anesthesia. They were randomized into the supine (S) group or lateral (L) group. After anesthesia induction, the child was placed in a standard sniffing position for conventional laryngoscopy in the S group, and the child was turned into the lateral position in the L group. Both Air-Q ILA and endotracheal tube were placed blindly in the supine position in the S group and lateral position in group L. The grading of glottic view, success rate, insertion time of the Air-Q ILA, and endotracheal intubation were noted in both the groups. RESULTS: The Air-Q ILA was successfully placed at the first attempt in 47 children in group S and 48 in group L. The overall blind orotracheal intubations, including first and second attempts, were successful in 45 children in the S group and 47 in the L group (P = 0.715). Eighty percent of patients in group L and 70% in group S had glottis grade 1 or 2 compared to grade 3, 4,5 (P = 0.249). The mean time of Air-Q ILA placement in groups S and L was 15.73 ± 5.64 s and 14.42 ± 4.16 s (P = 0.195). The mean duration of blind endotracheal intubation through the Air-Q ILA was 24.88 ± 14.75 s in group S and 17.57 ± 5.35 s in group L (P = 0.002). In both the groups, none of the children had bronchospasm, laryngospasm, desaturation, or aspiration. The airway trauma evident by blood staining on the Air-Q ILA on removal was revealed in 2 cases in group S, and 3 cases in group L. None of the children in group S and 4 children in group L had postoperative stridor. Postoperative hoarseness was reported in 3 children in group S and none in group L within 24 hours. CONCLUSION: The Air-Q ILA can be used as a conduit for blind orotracheal intubation in children in both supine and lateral positions while maintaining an effective airway seal. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9728458/ /pubmed/36505210 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_80_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Pandey, Ravinder K.
Sharma, Ankur
Garg, Rakesh
Depal, Vini
Punj, Jyotsna
Darlong, V
Sinha, Renu
Baidya, Dalim K.
Subramanian, Rajkumar
Air-Q ILA as a conduit for orotracheal intubation in children: A randomized control trial for comparison between supine and lateral patient positions
title Air-Q ILA as a conduit for orotracheal intubation in children: A randomized control trial for comparison between supine and lateral patient positions
title_full Air-Q ILA as a conduit for orotracheal intubation in children: A randomized control trial for comparison between supine and lateral patient positions
title_fullStr Air-Q ILA as a conduit for orotracheal intubation in children: A randomized control trial for comparison between supine and lateral patient positions
title_full_unstemmed Air-Q ILA as a conduit for orotracheal intubation in children: A randomized control trial for comparison between supine and lateral patient positions
title_short Air-Q ILA as a conduit for orotracheal intubation in children: A randomized control trial for comparison between supine and lateral patient positions
title_sort air-q ila as a conduit for orotracheal intubation in children: a randomized control trial for comparison between supine and lateral patient positions
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9728458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36505210
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_80_21
work_keys_str_mv AT pandeyravinderk airqilaasaconduitfororotrachealintubationinchildrenarandomizedcontroltrialforcomparisonbetweensupineandlateralpatientpositions
AT sharmaankur airqilaasaconduitfororotrachealintubationinchildrenarandomizedcontroltrialforcomparisonbetweensupineandlateralpatientpositions
AT gargrakesh airqilaasaconduitfororotrachealintubationinchildrenarandomizedcontroltrialforcomparisonbetweensupineandlateralpatientpositions
AT depalvini airqilaasaconduitfororotrachealintubationinchildrenarandomizedcontroltrialforcomparisonbetweensupineandlateralpatientpositions
AT punjjyotsna airqilaasaconduitfororotrachealintubationinchildrenarandomizedcontroltrialforcomparisonbetweensupineandlateralpatientpositions
AT darlongv airqilaasaconduitfororotrachealintubationinchildrenarandomizedcontroltrialforcomparisonbetweensupineandlateralpatientpositions
AT sinharenu airqilaasaconduitfororotrachealintubationinchildrenarandomizedcontroltrialforcomparisonbetweensupineandlateralpatientpositions
AT baidyadalimk airqilaasaconduitfororotrachealintubationinchildrenarandomizedcontroltrialforcomparisonbetweensupineandlateralpatientpositions
AT subramanianrajkumar airqilaasaconduitfororotrachealintubationinchildrenarandomizedcontroltrialforcomparisonbetweensupineandlateralpatientpositions