Cargando…
Let’s decide what would be convincing, conduct randomized trials with rigorous comparison conditions, and report tests of moderation and publication bias in meta-analyses
We appreciate Jacobson and colleagues’ thoughtful commentary on our meta-review of mobile phone-based interventions for mental health. In this response, we address 2 issues raised: requiring low to moderate heterogeneity (I(2) < 50%) and requiring no evidence of publication bias for evidence to b...
Autores principales: | Goldberg, Simon B., Torous, John, Sun, Shufang |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9728627/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36484072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000127 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Let's Face It—Complex Traits Are Just Not That Simple
por: Hallgrimsson, Benedikt, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Morton, Gould, and Bias: A Comment on “The Mismeasure of Science”
por: Weisberg, Michael, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
The facts of the matter: What is a hormone?
por: Karsenty, Gerard
Publicado: (2020) -
Mobile phone–based interventions for mental health show promise of effectiveness, but what does the evidence tell us about what needs to come next?
por: Jacobson, Nicholas C., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
What do we talk about when we talk about rhythm?
por: Obleser, Jonas, et al.
Publicado: (2017)