Cargando…

Blood pressure variability in individuals with diabetes mellitus: a scoping review

OBJECTIVES: to map methods and devices used to assess very short-, short-, medium-, and long-term pressure variability in adults with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: scoping review conducted in January and February 2021 in MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, LILACS, PubMed, and Embase databases...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: da Silva, Antonia Fabiana Rodrigues, Cruz, Rebeca Chaves, de Albuquerque, Nila Larisse Silva, da Silva, Viviane Martins, de Araujo, Thelma Leite
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9728811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35584515
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0804
_version_ 1784845343498698752
author da Silva, Antonia Fabiana Rodrigues
Cruz, Rebeca Chaves
de Albuquerque, Nila Larisse Silva
da Silva, Viviane Martins
de Araujo, Thelma Leite
author_facet da Silva, Antonia Fabiana Rodrigues
Cruz, Rebeca Chaves
de Albuquerque, Nila Larisse Silva
da Silva, Viviane Martins
de Araujo, Thelma Leite
author_sort da Silva, Antonia Fabiana Rodrigues
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: to map methods and devices used to assess very short-, short-, medium-, and long-term pressure variability in adults with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: scoping review conducted in January and February 2021 in MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, LILACS, PubMed, and Embase databases. Studies conducted within the last ten years analyzing pressure variability in adult and older patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 or 2 were included. Studies that used discontinued devices were excluded. RESULTS: the sample was composed of 25 articles published since 2017, with the majority developed in Japan (n=11); with the predominance of the oscillometric method (n=22); the most used devices were from the Omron(®) brand (n=14); the most detected type was long-term variability (n=10). CONCLUSIONS: we observed the increasing application of the oscillometric method for pressure variability analysis with various brands and models of automatic devices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9728811
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97288112022-12-15 Blood pressure variability in individuals with diabetes mellitus: a scoping review da Silva, Antonia Fabiana Rodrigues Cruz, Rebeca Chaves de Albuquerque, Nila Larisse Silva da Silva, Viviane Martins de Araujo, Thelma Leite Rev Bras Enferm Review OBJECTIVES: to map methods and devices used to assess very short-, short-, medium-, and long-term pressure variability in adults with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: scoping review conducted in January and February 2021 in MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, LILACS, PubMed, and Embase databases. Studies conducted within the last ten years analyzing pressure variability in adult and older patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 or 2 were included. Studies that used discontinued devices were excluded. RESULTS: the sample was composed of 25 articles published since 2017, with the majority developed in Japan (n=11); with the predominance of the oscillometric method (n=22); the most used devices were from the Omron(®) brand (n=14); the most detected type was long-term variability (n=10). CONCLUSIONS: we observed the increasing application of the oscillometric method for pressure variability analysis with various brands and models of automatic devices. Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem 2022-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9728811/ /pubmed/35584515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0804 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
da Silva, Antonia Fabiana Rodrigues
Cruz, Rebeca Chaves
de Albuquerque, Nila Larisse Silva
da Silva, Viviane Martins
de Araujo, Thelma Leite
Blood pressure variability in individuals with diabetes mellitus: a scoping review
title Blood pressure variability in individuals with diabetes mellitus: a scoping review
title_full Blood pressure variability in individuals with diabetes mellitus: a scoping review
title_fullStr Blood pressure variability in individuals with diabetes mellitus: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Blood pressure variability in individuals with diabetes mellitus: a scoping review
title_short Blood pressure variability in individuals with diabetes mellitus: a scoping review
title_sort blood pressure variability in individuals with diabetes mellitus: a scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9728811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35584515
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0804
work_keys_str_mv AT dasilvaantoniafabianarodrigues bloodpressurevariabilityinindividualswithdiabetesmellitusascopingreview
AT cruzrebecachaves bloodpressurevariabilityinindividualswithdiabetesmellitusascopingreview
AT dealbuquerquenilalarissesilva bloodpressurevariabilityinindividualswithdiabetesmellitusascopingreview
AT dasilvavivianemartins bloodpressurevariabilityinindividualswithdiabetesmellitusascopingreview
AT dearaujothelmaleite bloodpressurevariabilityinindividualswithdiabetesmellitusascopingreview