Cargando…
Responsible Innovation and De Jure Standardisation: An In-Depth Exploration of Moral Motives, Barriers, and Facilitators
Standardisation is increasingly seen as a means to insert ethics in innovation processes. We examine the institutionalisation of responsible innovation in de jure standardisation as this is an important but unexplored research area. In de jure standardisation, stakeholders collaborate in committees...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9729312/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36477560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-022-00415-z |
_version_ | 1784845463168483328 |
---|---|
author | Wiarda, Martijn van de Kaa, Geerten Doorn, Neelke Yaghmaei, Emad |
author_facet | Wiarda, Martijn van de Kaa, Geerten Doorn, Neelke Yaghmaei, Emad |
author_sort | Wiarda, Martijn |
collection | PubMed |
description | Standardisation is increasingly seen as a means to insert ethics in innovation processes. We examine the institutionalisation of responsible innovation in de jure standardisation as this is an important but unexplored research area. In de jure standardisation, stakeholders collaborate in committees to develop standards. We adopt the anticipation, inclusion, reflexivity, and responsiveness responsible innovation framework as our theoretical lens. Our study suggests that responsible standardisation processes should embody forms of these four dimensions. We investigate the institutionalisation of these dimensions and identify 96 factors that can motivate, hinder, or facilitate responsible standardisation. Factors were found through in-depth interviews with managers of a standard developing organisation. These are subsequently validated/rejected using surveys completed by committee representatives. The results suggest that the social desirability of standards is not self-evident. This study could pave the way for future research on responsible standardisation processes, complementing research on legitimacy, responsible innovation, and standardisation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9729312 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97293122022-12-09 Responsible Innovation and De Jure Standardisation: An In-Depth Exploration of Moral Motives, Barriers, and Facilitators Wiarda, Martijn van de Kaa, Geerten Doorn, Neelke Yaghmaei, Emad Sci Eng Ethics Original Research/scholarship Standardisation is increasingly seen as a means to insert ethics in innovation processes. We examine the institutionalisation of responsible innovation in de jure standardisation as this is an important but unexplored research area. In de jure standardisation, stakeholders collaborate in committees to develop standards. We adopt the anticipation, inclusion, reflexivity, and responsiveness responsible innovation framework as our theoretical lens. Our study suggests that responsible standardisation processes should embody forms of these four dimensions. We investigate the institutionalisation of these dimensions and identify 96 factors that can motivate, hinder, or facilitate responsible standardisation. Factors were found through in-depth interviews with managers of a standard developing organisation. These are subsequently validated/rejected using surveys completed by committee representatives. The results suggest that the social desirability of standards is not self-evident. This study could pave the way for future research on responsible standardisation processes, complementing research on legitimacy, responsible innovation, and standardisation. Springer Netherlands 2022-12-07 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9729312/ /pubmed/36477560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-022-00415-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research/scholarship Wiarda, Martijn van de Kaa, Geerten Doorn, Neelke Yaghmaei, Emad Responsible Innovation and De Jure Standardisation: An In-Depth Exploration of Moral Motives, Barriers, and Facilitators |
title | Responsible Innovation and De Jure Standardisation: An In-Depth Exploration of Moral Motives, Barriers, and Facilitators |
title_full | Responsible Innovation and De Jure Standardisation: An In-Depth Exploration of Moral Motives, Barriers, and Facilitators |
title_fullStr | Responsible Innovation and De Jure Standardisation: An In-Depth Exploration of Moral Motives, Barriers, and Facilitators |
title_full_unstemmed | Responsible Innovation and De Jure Standardisation: An In-Depth Exploration of Moral Motives, Barriers, and Facilitators |
title_short | Responsible Innovation and De Jure Standardisation: An In-Depth Exploration of Moral Motives, Barriers, and Facilitators |
title_sort | responsible innovation and de jure standardisation: an in-depth exploration of moral motives, barriers, and facilitators |
topic | Original Research/scholarship |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9729312/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36477560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-022-00415-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wiardamartijn responsibleinnovationanddejurestandardisationanindepthexplorationofmoralmotivesbarriersandfacilitators AT vandekaageerten responsibleinnovationanddejurestandardisationanindepthexplorationofmoralmotivesbarriersandfacilitators AT doornneelke responsibleinnovationanddejurestandardisationanindepthexplorationofmoralmotivesbarriersandfacilitators AT yaghmaeiemad responsibleinnovationanddejurestandardisationanindepthexplorationofmoralmotivesbarriersandfacilitators |