Cargando…

Measuring relatives’ perceptions of end-of-life communication with physicians in five countries: a psychometric analysis

The Family Perceptions of Physician-Family Caregiver Communication scale (FPPFC) was developed to assess quality of physician-family end-of-life communication in nursing homes. However, its validity has been tested only in the USA and the Netherlands. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the FPPFC c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koniewski, Maciej, Barańska, Ilona, Kijowska, Violetta, van der Steen, Jenny T., Wichmann, Anne B., Payne, Sheila, Gambassi, Giovanni, Van Den Noortgate, Nele, Finne-Soveri, Harriet, Smets, Tinne, Van den Block, Lieve, Szczerbińska, Katarzyna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9729495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36506660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10433-022-00742-x
_version_ 1784845480964915200
author Koniewski, Maciej
Barańska, Ilona
Kijowska, Violetta
van der Steen, Jenny T.
Wichmann, Anne B.
Payne, Sheila
Gambassi, Giovanni
Van Den Noortgate, Nele
Finne-Soveri, Harriet
Smets, Tinne
Van den Block, Lieve
Szczerbińska, Katarzyna
author_facet Koniewski, Maciej
Barańska, Ilona
Kijowska, Violetta
van der Steen, Jenny T.
Wichmann, Anne B.
Payne, Sheila
Gambassi, Giovanni
Van Den Noortgate, Nele
Finne-Soveri, Harriet
Smets, Tinne
Van den Block, Lieve
Szczerbińska, Katarzyna
author_sort Koniewski, Maciej
collection PubMed
description The Family Perceptions of Physician-Family Caregiver Communication scale (FPPFC) was developed to assess quality of physician-family end-of-life communication in nursing homes. However, its validity has been tested only in the USA and the Netherlands. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the FPPFC construct validity and its reliability, as well as the psychometric characteristics of the items comprising the scale. Data were collected in cross-sectional study in Belgium, Finland, Italy, the Netherlands and Poland. The factorial structure was tested in confirmatory factor analysis. Item parameters were obtained using an item response theory model. Participants were 737 relatives of nursing home residents who died up to 3 months prior to the study. In general, the FPPFC scale proved to be a unidimensional and reliable measure of the perceived quality of physician-family communication in nursing home settings in all five countries. Nevertheless, we found unsatisfactory fit to the data with a confirmatory model. An item that referred to advance care planning performed less well in Poland and Italy than in the Northern European countries. In the item analysis, we found that with no loss of reliability and with increased coherency of the item content across countries, the full 7-item version can be shortened to a 4-item version, which may be more appropriate for international studies. Therefore, we recommend use of the brief 4-item FPPFC version by nursing home managers and professionals as an evaluation tool, and by researchers for their studies as these four items confer the same meaning across countries. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10433-022-00742-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9729495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97294952022-12-09 Measuring relatives’ perceptions of end-of-life communication with physicians in five countries: a psychometric analysis Koniewski, Maciej Barańska, Ilona Kijowska, Violetta van der Steen, Jenny T. Wichmann, Anne B. Payne, Sheila Gambassi, Giovanni Van Den Noortgate, Nele Finne-Soveri, Harriet Smets, Tinne Van den Block, Lieve Szczerbińska, Katarzyna Eur J Ageing Original Investigation The Family Perceptions of Physician-Family Caregiver Communication scale (FPPFC) was developed to assess quality of physician-family end-of-life communication in nursing homes. However, its validity has been tested only in the USA and the Netherlands. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the FPPFC construct validity and its reliability, as well as the psychometric characteristics of the items comprising the scale. Data were collected in cross-sectional study in Belgium, Finland, Italy, the Netherlands and Poland. The factorial structure was tested in confirmatory factor analysis. Item parameters were obtained using an item response theory model. Participants were 737 relatives of nursing home residents who died up to 3 months prior to the study. In general, the FPPFC scale proved to be a unidimensional and reliable measure of the perceived quality of physician-family communication in nursing home settings in all five countries. Nevertheless, we found unsatisfactory fit to the data with a confirmatory model. An item that referred to advance care planning performed less well in Poland and Italy than in the Northern European countries. In the item analysis, we found that with no loss of reliability and with increased coherency of the item content across countries, the full 7-item version can be shortened to a 4-item version, which may be more appropriate for international studies. Therefore, we recommend use of the brief 4-item FPPFC version by nursing home managers and professionals as an evaluation tool, and by researchers for their studies as these four items confer the same meaning across countries. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10433-022-00742-x. Springer Netherlands 2022-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9729495/ /pubmed/36506660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10433-022-00742-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Koniewski, Maciej
Barańska, Ilona
Kijowska, Violetta
van der Steen, Jenny T.
Wichmann, Anne B.
Payne, Sheila
Gambassi, Giovanni
Van Den Noortgate, Nele
Finne-Soveri, Harriet
Smets, Tinne
Van den Block, Lieve
Szczerbińska, Katarzyna
Measuring relatives’ perceptions of end-of-life communication with physicians in five countries: a psychometric analysis
title Measuring relatives’ perceptions of end-of-life communication with physicians in five countries: a psychometric analysis
title_full Measuring relatives’ perceptions of end-of-life communication with physicians in five countries: a psychometric analysis
title_fullStr Measuring relatives’ perceptions of end-of-life communication with physicians in five countries: a psychometric analysis
title_full_unstemmed Measuring relatives’ perceptions of end-of-life communication with physicians in five countries: a psychometric analysis
title_short Measuring relatives’ perceptions of end-of-life communication with physicians in five countries: a psychometric analysis
title_sort measuring relatives’ perceptions of end-of-life communication with physicians in five countries: a psychometric analysis
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9729495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36506660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10433-022-00742-x
work_keys_str_mv AT koniewskimaciej measuringrelativesperceptionsofendoflifecommunicationwithphysiciansinfivecountriesapsychometricanalysis
AT baranskailona measuringrelativesperceptionsofendoflifecommunicationwithphysiciansinfivecountriesapsychometricanalysis
AT kijowskavioletta measuringrelativesperceptionsofendoflifecommunicationwithphysiciansinfivecountriesapsychometricanalysis
AT vandersteenjennyt measuringrelativesperceptionsofendoflifecommunicationwithphysiciansinfivecountriesapsychometricanalysis
AT wichmannanneb measuringrelativesperceptionsofendoflifecommunicationwithphysiciansinfivecountriesapsychometricanalysis
AT paynesheila measuringrelativesperceptionsofendoflifecommunicationwithphysiciansinfivecountriesapsychometricanalysis
AT gambassigiovanni measuringrelativesperceptionsofendoflifecommunicationwithphysiciansinfivecountriesapsychometricanalysis
AT vandennoortgatenele measuringrelativesperceptionsofendoflifecommunicationwithphysiciansinfivecountriesapsychometricanalysis
AT finnesoveriharriet measuringrelativesperceptionsofendoflifecommunicationwithphysiciansinfivecountriesapsychometricanalysis
AT smetstinne measuringrelativesperceptionsofendoflifecommunicationwithphysiciansinfivecountriesapsychometricanalysis
AT vandenblocklieve measuringrelativesperceptionsofendoflifecommunicationwithphysiciansinfivecountriesapsychometricanalysis
AT szczerbinskakatarzyna measuringrelativesperceptionsofendoflifecommunicationwithphysiciansinfivecountriesapsychometricanalysis
AT measuringrelativesperceptionsofendoflifecommunicationwithphysiciansinfivecountriesapsychometricanalysis