Cargando…

Bone envelope for implant placement after alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE: To assess the dimensional establishment of a bony envelope after alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) with deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) in order to estimate the surgical feasibility of standard diameter implants placement without any additional augmentation methods. METHODS: PubMed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fischer, Kai R., Solderer, Alex, Arlt, Kristina, Heumann, Christian, Liu, Chun Ching, Schmidlin, Patrick R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9729513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36477662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-022-00453-z
_version_ 1784845484326649856
author Fischer, Kai R.
Solderer, Alex
Arlt, Kristina
Heumann, Christian
Liu, Chun Ching
Schmidlin, Patrick R.
author_facet Fischer, Kai R.
Solderer, Alex
Arlt, Kristina
Heumann, Christian
Liu, Chun Ching
Schmidlin, Patrick R.
author_sort Fischer, Kai R.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess the dimensional establishment of a bony envelope after alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) with deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) in order to estimate the surgical feasibility of standard diameter implants placement without any additional augmentation methods. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and CENTRAL databases were searched for suitable titles and abstracts using PICO elements. Inclusion criteria were as follows: randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comprising at least ten systemically healthy patients; test groups comprised placement of (collagenated) DBBM w/o membrane and control groups of no grafting, respectively. Selected abstracts were checked regarding their suitability, followed by full-text screening and subsequent statistical data analysis. Probabilities and number needed to treat (NNT) for implant placement without any further need of bone graft were calculated. RESULTS: The initial database search identified 2583 studies. Finally, nine studies with a total of 177 implants placed after ARP with DBBM and 130 implants after SH were included for the quantitative and qualitative evaluation. A mean difference of 1.13 mm in ridge width in favour of ARP with DBBM could be calculated throughout all included studies (95% CI 0.28–1.98, t2 = 1–1063, I2 = 68.0%, p < 0.01). Probabilities for implant placement with 2 mm surrounding bone requiring theoretically no further bone augmentation ranged from 6 to 19% depending on implant diameter (3.25: 19%, RD = 0.19, C = 0.06–0.32, p < 0.01/4.0: 14%, RD = 0.14, C = 0.05–0.23, p < 0.01/5.0: 6%, RD = 0.06, C = 0.00–0.12, p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: ARP employing DBBM reduces ridge shrinkage on average by 1.13 mm and improves the possibility to place standard diameter implants with up to 2 mm circumferential bone housing; however, no ARP would have been necessary or additional augmentative bone interventions are still required in 4 out of 5 cases. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9729513
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97295132022-12-09 Bone envelope for implant placement after alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and meta-analysis Fischer, Kai R. Solderer, Alex Arlt, Kristina Heumann, Christian Liu, Chun Ching Schmidlin, Patrick R. Int J Implant Dent Review PURPOSE: To assess the dimensional establishment of a bony envelope after alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) with deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) in order to estimate the surgical feasibility of standard diameter implants placement without any additional augmentation methods. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and CENTRAL databases were searched for suitable titles and abstracts using PICO elements. Inclusion criteria were as follows: randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comprising at least ten systemically healthy patients; test groups comprised placement of (collagenated) DBBM w/o membrane and control groups of no grafting, respectively. Selected abstracts were checked regarding their suitability, followed by full-text screening and subsequent statistical data analysis. Probabilities and number needed to treat (NNT) for implant placement without any further need of bone graft were calculated. RESULTS: The initial database search identified 2583 studies. Finally, nine studies with a total of 177 implants placed after ARP with DBBM and 130 implants after SH were included for the quantitative and qualitative evaluation. A mean difference of 1.13 mm in ridge width in favour of ARP with DBBM could be calculated throughout all included studies (95% CI 0.28–1.98, t2 = 1–1063, I2 = 68.0%, p < 0.01). Probabilities for implant placement with 2 mm surrounding bone requiring theoretically no further bone augmentation ranged from 6 to 19% depending on implant diameter (3.25: 19%, RD = 0.19, C = 0.06–0.32, p < 0.01/4.0: 14%, RD = 0.14, C = 0.05–0.23, p < 0.01/5.0: 6%, RD = 0.06, C = 0.00–0.12, p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: ARP employing DBBM reduces ridge shrinkage on average by 1.13 mm and improves the possibility to place standard diameter implants with up to 2 mm circumferential bone housing; however, no ARP would have been necessary or additional augmentative bone interventions are still required in 4 out of 5 cases. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9729513/ /pubmed/36477662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-022-00453-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Fischer, Kai R.
Solderer, Alex
Arlt, Kristina
Heumann, Christian
Liu, Chun Ching
Schmidlin, Patrick R.
Bone envelope for implant placement after alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Bone envelope for implant placement after alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Bone envelope for implant placement after alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Bone envelope for implant placement after alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Bone envelope for implant placement after alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Bone envelope for implant placement after alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort bone envelope for implant placement after alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9729513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36477662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-022-00453-z
work_keys_str_mv AT fischerkair boneenvelopeforimplantplacementafteralveolarridgepreservationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT soldereralex boneenvelopeforimplantplacementafteralveolarridgepreservationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT arltkristina boneenvelopeforimplantplacementafteralveolarridgepreservationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT heumannchristian boneenvelopeforimplantplacementafteralveolarridgepreservationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuchunching boneenvelopeforimplantplacementafteralveolarridgepreservationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT schmidlinpatrickr boneenvelopeforimplantplacementafteralveolarridgepreservationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis