Cargando…
Bone envelope for implant placement after alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
PURPOSE: To assess the dimensional establishment of a bony envelope after alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) with deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) in order to estimate the surgical feasibility of standard diameter implants placement without any additional augmentation methods. METHODS: PubMed...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9729513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36477662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-022-00453-z |
_version_ | 1784845484326649856 |
---|---|
author | Fischer, Kai R. Solderer, Alex Arlt, Kristina Heumann, Christian Liu, Chun Ching Schmidlin, Patrick R. |
author_facet | Fischer, Kai R. Solderer, Alex Arlt, Kristina Heumann, Christian Liu, Chun Ching Schmidlin, Patrick R. |
author_sort | Fischer, Kai R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To assess the dimensional establishment of a bony envelope after alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) with deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) in order to estimate the surgical feasibility of standard diameter implants placement without any additional augmentation methods. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and CENTRAL databases were searched for suitable titles and abstracts using PICO elements. Inclusion criteria were as follows: randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comprising at least ten systemically healthy patients; test groups comprised placement of (collagenated) DBBM w/o membrane and control groups of no grafting, respectively. Selected abstracts were checked regarding their suitability, followed by full-text screening and subsequent statistical data analysis. Probabilities and number needed to treat (NNT) for implant placement without any further need of bone graft were calculated. RESULTS: The initial database search identified 2583 studies. Finally, nine studies with a total of 177 implants placed after ARP with DBBM and 130 implants after SH were included for the quantitative and qualitative evaluation. A mean difference of 1.13 mm in ridge width in favour of ARP with DBBM could be calculated throughout all included studies (95% CI 0.28–1.98, t2 = 1–1063, I2 = 68.0%, p < 0.01). Probabilities for implant placement with 2 mm surrounding bone requiring theoretically no further bone augmentation ranged from 6 to 19% depending on implant diameter (3.25: 19%, RD = 0.19, C = 0.06–0.32, p < 0.01/4.0: 14%, RD = 0.14, C = 0.05–0.23, p < 0.01/5.0: 6%, RD = 0.06, C = 0.00–0.12, p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: ARP employing DBBM reduces ridge shrinkage on average by 1.13 mm and improves the possibility to place standard diameter implants with up to 2 mm circumferential bone housing; however, no ARP would have been necessary or additional augmentative bone interventions are still required in 4 out of 5 cases. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9729513 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97295132022-12-09 Bone envelope for implant placement after alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and meta-analysis Fischer, Kai R. Solderer, Alex Arlt, Kristina Heumann, Christian Liu, Chun Ching Schmidlin, Patrick R. Int J Implant Dent Review PURPOSE: To assess the dimensional establishment of a bony envelope after alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) with deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) in order to estimate the surgical feasibility of standard diameter implants placement without any additional augmentation methods. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and CENTRAL databases were searched for suitable titles and abstracts using PICO elements. Inclusion criteria were as follows: randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comprising at least ten systemically healthy patients; test groups comprised placement of (collagenated) DBBM w/o membrane and control groups of no grafting, respectively. Selected abstracts were checked regarding their suitability, followed by full-text screening and subsequent statistical data analysis. Probabilities and number needed to treat (NNT) for implant placement without any further need of bone graft were calculated. RESULTS: The initial database search identified 2583 studies. Finally, nine studies with a total of 177 implants placed after ARP with DBBM and 130 implants after SH were included for the quantitative and qualitative evaluation. A mean difference of 1.13 mm in ridge width in favour of ARP with DBBM could be calculated throughout all included studies (95% CI 0.28–1.98, t2 = 1–1063, I2 = 68.0%, p < 0.01). Probabilities for implant placement with 2 mm surrounding bone requiring theoretically no further bone augmentation ranged from 6 to 19% depending on implant diameter (3.25: 19%, RD = 0.19, C = 0.06–0.32, p < 0.01/4.0: 14%, RD = 0.14, C = 0.05–0.23, p < 0.01/5.0: 6%, RD = 0.06, C = 0.00–0.12, p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: ARP employing DBBM reduces ridge shrinkage on average by 1.13 mm and improves the possibility to place standard diameter implants with up to 2 mm circumferential bone housing; however, no ARP would have been necessary or additional augmentative bone interventions are still required in 4 out of 5 cases. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9729513/ /pubmed/36477662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-022-00453-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Fischer, Kai R. Solderer, Alex Arlt, Kristina Heumann, Christian Liu, Chun Ching Schmidlin, Patrick R. Bone envelope for implant placement after alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Bone envelope for implant placement after alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Bone envelope for implant placement after alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Bone envelope for implant placement after alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Bone envelope for implant placement after alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Bone envelope for implant placement after alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | bone envelope for implant placement after alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9729513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36477662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-022-00453-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fischerkair boneenvelopeforimplantplacementafteralveolarridgepreservationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT soldereralex boneenvelopeforimplantplacementafteralveolarridgepreservationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT arltkristina boneenvelopeforimplantplacementafteralveolarridgepreservationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT heumannchristian boneenvelopeforimplantplacementafteralveolarridgepreservationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuchunching boneenvelopeforimplantplacementafteralveolarridgepreservationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT schmidlinpatrickr boneenvelopeforimplantplacementafteralveolarridgepreservationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |