Cargando…

Comparing rehabilitation outcomes for patients admitted to the intensive care unit with COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation during the first two waves of the pandemic: A service evaluation

OBJECTIVES: To compare rehabilitation outcomes of patients admitted to the intensive care unit with COVID-19 and mechanically ventilated during wave 1 and 2, receiving two different models of physiotherapy delivery. METHODS: Adults admitted to the intensive care unit between October–March 2021 (wave...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weblin, Jonathan, Harriman, Adam, Butler, Katrina, Snelson, Catherine, McWilliams, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9729646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36528463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2022.103370
_version_ 1784845514740596736
author Weblin, Jonathan
Harriman, Adam
Butler, Katrina
Snelson, Catherine
McWilliams, David
author_facet Weblin, Jonathan
Harriman, Adam
Butler, Katrina
Snelson, Catherine
McWilliams, David
author_sort Weblin, Jonathan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare rehabilitation outcomes of patients admitted to the intensive care unit with COVID-19 and mechanically ventilated during wave 1 and 2, receiving two different models of physiotherapy delivery. METHODS: Adults admitted to the intensive care unit between October–March 2021 (wave 2) with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 and mechanically ventilated for >24 hours were included. During wave 2, rehabilitation was provided by physiotherapists over five days, with only emergency respiratory physiotherapy delivered at weekends. Rehabilitation status was measured daily using the Manchester Mobility Score to identify time taken to first mobilise and highest level of mobility achieved at ICU discharge. Outcomes were compared to data previously published from the same ICU during ‘wave 1’ (March–April 2020) when a seven-day rehabilitation physiotherapy service was provided. RESULTS: A total of n = 291 patients were included in analysis; 110 from wave 1, and 181 from wave 2. Patient characteristics and medical management were similar between waves. Mean ± SD time to first mobilise was slower in wave 2 (15 ± 11 days vs 14 ± 7 days), with overall mobility scores lower at both ICU (MMS 5 (Step transferring) vs MMS 4 (standing practice) (4), p < 0.05) and hospital (MMS 7 (Mobile > 30 m MMS) vs MMS 6 (Mobile < 30 m MMS), p < 0.0001) discharge. Significantly more patients in wave 2 required ongoing rehabilitation either at home or as an inpatient compared to wave 1 (81 % vs 49 %, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The change in physiotherapy staff provision from a seven-day rehabilitation service during wave 1 to a five day rehabilitation service with emergency respiratory physio only at weekends in wave 2 was associated with delayed time to first mobilise, lower levels of mobility at both intensive care unit and hospital discharge and higher requirement for ongoing rehabilitation at the point of hospital discharge.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9729646
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97296462022-12-08 Comparing rehabilitation outcomes for patients admitted to the intensive care unit with COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation during the first two waves of the pandemic: A service evaluation Weblin, Jonathan Harriman, Adam Butler, Katrina Snelson, Catherine McWilliams, David Intensive Crit Care Nurs Quality Improvement Article OBJECTIVES: To compare rehabilitation outcomes of patients admitted to the intensive care unit with COVID-19 and mechanically ventilated during wave 1 and 2, receiving two different models of physiotherapy delivery. METHODS: Adults admitted to the intensive care unit between October–March 2021 (wave 2) with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 and mechanically ventilated for >24 hours were included. During wave 2, rehabilitation was provided by physiotherapists over five days, with only emergency respiratory physiotherapy delivered at weekends. Rehabilitation status was measured daily using the Manchester Mobility Score to identify time taken to first mobilise and highest level of mobility achieved at ICU discharge. Outcomes were compared to data previously published from the same ICU during ‘wave 1’ (March–April 2020) when a seven-day rehabilitation physiotherapy service was provided. RESULTS: A total of n = 291 patients were included in analysis; 110 from wave 1, and 181 from wave 2. Patient characteristics and medical management were similar between waves. Mean ± SD time to first mobilise was slower in wave 2 (15 ± 11 days vs 14 ± 7 days), with overall mobility scores lower at both ICU (MMS 5 (Step transferring) vs MMS 4 (standing practice) (4), p < 0.05) and hospital (MMS 7 (Mobile > 30 m MMS) vs MMS 6 (Mobile < 30 m MMS), p < 0.0001) discharge. Significantly more patients in wave 2 required ongoing rehabilitation either at home or as an inpatient compared to wave 1 (81 % vs 49 %, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The change in physiotherapy staff provision from a seven-day rehabilitation service during wave 1 to a five day rehabilitation service with emergency respiratory physio only at weekends in wave 2 was associated with delayed time to first mobilise, lower levels of mobility at both intensive care unit and hospital discharge and higher requirement for ongoing rehabilitation at the point of hospital discharge. Elsevier Ltd. 2023-04 2022-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9729646/ /pubmed/36528463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2022.103370 Text en © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Quality Improvement Article
Weblin, Jonathan
Harriman, Adam
Butler, Katrina
Snelson, Catherine
McWilliams, David
Comparing rehabilitation outcomes for patients admitted to the intensive care unit with COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation during the first two waves of the pandemic: A service evaluation
title Comparing rehabilitation outcomes for patients admitted to the intensive care unit with COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation during the first two waves of the pandemic: A service evaluation
title_full Comparing rehabilitation outcomes for patients admitted to the intensive care unit with COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation during the first two waves of the pandemic: A service evaluation
title_fullStr Comparing rehabilitation outcomes for patients admitted to the intensive care unit with COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation during the first two waves of the pandemic: A service evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Comparing rehabilitation outcomes for patients admitted to the intensive care unit with COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation during the first two waves of the pandemic: A service evaluation
title_short Comparing rehabilitation outcomes for patients admitted to the intensive care unit with COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation during the first two waves of the pandemic: A service evaluation
title_sort comparing rehabilitation outcomes for patients admitted to the intensive care unit with covid-19 requiring mechanical ventilation during the first two waves of the pandemic: a service evaluation
topic Quality Improvement Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9729646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36528463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2022.103370
work_keys_str_mv AT weblinjonathan comparingrehabilitationoutcomesforpatientsadmittedtotheintensivecareunitwithcovid19requiringmechanicalventilationduringthefirsttwowavesofthepandemicaserviceevaluation
AT harrimanadam comparingrehabilitationoutcomesforpatientsadmittedtotheintensivecareunitwithcovid19requiringmechanicalventilationduringthefirsttwowavesofthepandemicaserviceevaluation
AT butlerkatrina comparingrehabilitationoutcomesforpatientsadmittedtotheintensivecareunitwithcovid19requiringmechanicalventilationduringthefirsttwowavesofthepandemicaserviceevaluation
AT snelsoncatherine comparingrehabilitationoutcomesforpatientsadmittedtotheintensivecareunitwithcovid19requiringmechanicalventilationduringthefirsttwowavesofthepandemicaserviceevaluation
AT mcwilliamsdavid comparingrehabilitationoutcomesforpatientsadmittedtotheintensivecareunitwithcovid19requiringmechanicalventilationduringthefirsttwowavesofthepandemicaserviceevaluation