Cargando…
Did COVID-19 lockdown delay actually worsen melanoma prognosis?()
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 lockdown possibly meant a delay in the diagnosis and treatment of melanoma and therefore, worsening its prognosis. This unique situation of diagnosis deferral is an exceptional opportunity to investigate melanoma biology. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the immediate and mid-term im...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9729652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36567164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.abd.2022.08.004 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 lockdown possibly meant a delay in the diagnosis and treatment of melanoma and therefore, worsening its prognosis. This unique situation of diagnosis deferral is an exceptional opportunity to investigate melanoma biology. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the immediate and mid-term impact of diagnosis delay on melanoma. METHODS: A retrospective observational study of melanoma diagnosed between March 14(th) 2019 and March 13(th) 2021. We compared the characteristics of melanomas diagnosed during the first 6-month period after the lockdown instauration and a second period after recovery of normal activity with the same periods of the previous year, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 119 melanomas were diagnosed. There were no differences in age, sex, incidence, location, presence of ulceration or mitoses, and in situ/invasive melanoma rate (p > 0.05). After the recovery of the normal activity, Breslow thickness increased in comparison with the previous year (2.4 vs 1.9 mm, p < 0.05) resulting in a significant upstaging according to the AJCC 8(th) ed. (p < 0.05). STUDY LIMITATIONS: The main limitation is that this is a single-center study. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 lockdown implied a diagnosis delay leading to a mid-term increase in Breslow thickness and an upstaging of invasive melanomas. However, the detection deferral did not result in a higher progression of in situ to invasive melanoma, in our sample. |
---|