Cargando…
Algorithms that transfer between different energy metering methods for simplification of energy trading and unified billing
The paper settles a discrepancy between two smart-metering methods. The issue bears on a billion installed smart meters and $36B electric-energy trading market. The contemporary problem of the energy-metering registration gap between the methods, relates to energy-trading unified-billing, and it wil...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9730140/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36506402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11542 |
_version_ | 1784845604304715776 |
---|---|
author | Calamaro, Netzah Donko, Moshe Shmilovitz, Doron |
author_facet | Calamaro, Netzah Donko, Moshe Shmilovitz, Doron |
author_sort | Calamaro, Netzah |
collection | PubMed |
description | The paper settles a discrepancy between two smart-metering methods. The issue bears on a billion installed smart meters and $36B electric-energy trading market. The contemporary problem of the energy-metering registration gap between the methods, relates to energy-trading unified-billing, and it will aggravate in the future. A mathematical definition for active and reactive, import/export energy-metering formulas is given for vector/arithmetic common metering models employing energy formulas rather than power, energy being the language of smart metering design/usage/billing. Economic reasoning, difficulty of implementation, and required regulator's flexibility at establishing different import/export tariffs-per different tariff program-types are explained. Innovations in the presented work include: (1) mathematical formulation of metering-methods-definitions that is validated over: one EU organization, twelve major meter manufacturers, twenty model-types, is presented and tested. (2) formulation of drivers for 100% accurate conversion from one method to another is developed. (3) fifteen real-life experiments covering the entire problem spectrum are conducted with new results, discovering new energy/tariff “conservation-rules”, relevant to manufacturers/utility companies/regulators/customers. (4) a correct segmentation of customers to energy/tariff registration-gap is generated. (5) an algebra that is suitable to energy metering/conversion/tariff computation-and-design is presented. (6) research reduces the cost of a contemporary solution by 98%. (6) Advantages/disadvantages of each method are named. (7) scenarios where one of the energy methods may be incorrect are considered-and-rejected. Eleven theorems formulated and proved, and fifteen field test cases covering the entire electricity market. (8) regulators may maintain arithmetic meters, enjoying their added value, and manage precise arithmetic/vector metering using these meters– especially using load profile and potentially satisfying with billing registers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9730140 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97301402022-12-09 Algorithms that transfer between different energy metering methods for simplification of energy trading and unified billing Calamaro, Netzah Donko, Moshe Shmilovitz, Doron Heliyon Research Article The paper settles a discrepancy between two smart-metering methods. The issue bears on a billion installed smart meters and $36B electric-energy trading market. The contemporary problem of the energy-metering registration gap between the methods, relates to energy-trading unified-billing, and it will aggravate in the future. A mathematical definition for active and reactive, import/export energy-metering formulas is given for vector/arithmetic common metering models employing energy formulas rather than power, energy being the language of smart metering design/usage/billing. Economic reasoning, difficulty of implementation, and required regulator's flexibility at establishing different import/export tariffs-per different tariff program-types are explained. Innovations in the presented work include: (1) mathematical formulation of metering-methods-definitions that is validated over: one EU organization, twelve major meter manufacturers, twenty model-types, is presented and tested. (2) formulation of drivers for 100% accurate conversion from one method to another is developed. (3) fifteen real-life experiments covering the entire problem spectrum are conducted with new results, discovering new energy/tariff “conservation-rules”, relevant to manufacturers/utility companies/regulators/customers. (4) a correct segmentation of customers to energy/tariff registration-gap is generated. (5) an algebra that is suitable to energy metering/conversion/tariff computation-and-design is presented. (6) research reduces the cost of a contemporary solution by 98%. (6) Advantages/disadvantages of each method are named. (7) scenarios where one of the energy methods may be incorrect are considered-and-rejected. Eleven theorems formulated and proved, and fifteen field test cases covering the entire electricity market. (8) regulators may maintain arithmetic meters, enjoying their added value, and manage precise arithmetic/vector metering using these meters– especially using load profile and potentially satisfying with billing registers. Elsevier 2022-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9730140/ /pubmed/36506402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11542 Text en © 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Calamaro, Netzah Donko, Moshe Shmilovitz, Doron Algorithms that transfer between different energy metering methods for simplification of energy trading and unified billing |
title | Algorithms that transfer between different energy metering methods for simplification of energy trading and unified billing |
title_full | Algorithms that transfer between different energy metering methods for simplification of energy trading and unified billing |
title_fullStr | Algorithms that transfer between different energy metering methods for simplification of energy trading and unified billing |
title_full_unstemmed | Algorithms that transfer between different energy metering methods for simplification of energy trading and unified billing |
title_short | Algorithms that transfer between different energy metering methods for simplification of energy trading and unified billing |
title_sort | algorithms that transfer between different energy metering methods for simplification of energy trading and unified billing |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9730140/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36506402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11542 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT calamaronetzah algorithmsthattransferbetweendifferentenergymeteringmethodsforsimplificationofenergytradingandunifiedbilling AT donkomoshe algorithmsthattransferbetweendifferentenergymeteringmethodsforsimplificationofenergytradingandunifiedbilling AT shmilovitzdoron algorithmsthattransferbetweendifferentenergymeteringmethodsforsimplificationofenergytradingandunifiedbilling |