Cargando…
Method comparison for Japanese encephalitis virus detection in samples collected from the Indo-Pacific region
INTRODUCTION: Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) is a mosquito-borne viral pathogen, which is becoming a growing public health concern throughout the Indo-Pacific. Five genotypes of JEV have been identified. Current vaccines are based on genotype III and provide a high degree of protection for four o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9730272/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36504937 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1051754 |
_version_ | 1784845629866901504 |
---|---|
author | Crispell, Gary Williams, Kelly Zielinski, Eric Iwami, Akira Homas, Zachary Thomas, Karen |
author_facet | Crispell, Gary Williams, Kelly Zielinski, Eric Iwami, Akira Homas, Zachary Thomas, Karen |
author_sort | Crispell, Gary |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) is a mosquito-borne viral pathogen, which is becoming a growing public health concern throughout the Indo-Pacific. Five genotypes of JEV have been identified. Current vaccines are based on genotype III and provide a high degree of protection for four of the five known genotypes. METHODS: RT-PCR, Magpix, Twist Biosciences Comprehensive Viral Research Panel (CVRP), and SISPA methods were used to detect JEV from mosquito samples collected in South Korea during 2021. These methods were compared to determine which method would be most effective for biosurveillance in the Indo-Pacific region. RESULTS: Our data showed that RT-PCR, Twist CVRP, and SISPA methods were all able to detect JEV genotype I, however, the proprietary Magpix panel was only able to detect JEV genotype III. Use of minION sequencing for pathogen detection in arthropod samples will require further method development. CONCLUSION: Biosurveillance of vectorborne pathogens remains an area of concern throughout the Indo-Pacific. RT-PCR was the most cost effective method used in the study, but TWIST CVRP allows for the identification of over 3,100 viral genomes. Further research and comparisons will be conducted to ensure optimal methods are used for large scale biosurveillance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9730272 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97302722022-12-09 Method comparison for Japanese encephalitis virus detection in samples collected from the Indo-Pacific region Crispell, Gary Williams, Kelly Zielinski, Eric Iwami, Akira Homas, Zachary Thomas, Karen Front Public Health Public Health INTRODUCTION: Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) is a mosquito-borne viral pathogen, which is becoming a growing public health concern throughout the Indo-Pacific. Five genotypes of JEV have been identified. Current vaccines are based on genotype III and provide a high degree of protection for four of the five known genotypes. METHODS: RT-PCR, Magpix, Twist Biosciences Comprehensive Viral Research Panel (CVRP), and SISPA methods were used to detect JEV from mosquito samples collected in South Korea during 2021. These methods were compared to determine which method would be most effective for biosurveillance in the Indo-Pacific region. RESULTS: Our data showed that RT-PCR, Twist CVRP, and SISPA methods were all able to detect JEV genotype I, however, the proprietary Magpix panel was only able to detect JEV genotype III. Use of minION sequencing for pathogen detection in arthropod samples will require further method development. CONCLUSION: Biosurveillance of vectorborne pathogens remains an area of concern throughout the Indo-Pacific. RT-PCR was the most cost effective method used in the study, but TWIST CVRP allows for the identification of over 3,100 viral genomes. Further research and comparisons will be conducted to ensure optimal methods are used for large scale biosurveillance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9730272/ /pubmed/36504937 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1051754 Text en Copyright © 2022 Crispell, Williams, Zielinski, Iwami, Homas and Thomas. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Crispell, Gary Williams, Kelly Zielinski, Eric Iwami, Akira Homas, Zachary Thomas, Karen Method comparison for Japanese encephalitis virus detection in samples collected from the Indo-Pacific region |
title | Method comparison for Japanese encephalitis virus detection in samples collected from the Indo-Pacific region |
title_full | Method comparison for Japanese encephalitis virus detection in samples collected from the Indo-Pacific region |
title_fullStr | Method comparison for Japanese encephalitis virus detection in samples collected from the Indo-Pacific region |
title_full_unstemmed | Method comparison for Japanese encephalitis virus detection in samples collected from the Indo-Pacific region |
title_short | Method comparison for Japanese encephalitis virus detection in samples collected from the Indo-Pacific region |
title_sort | method comparison for japanese encephalitis virus detection in samples collected from the indo-pacific region |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9730272/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36504937 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1051754 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT crispellgary methodcomparisonforjapaneseencephalitisvirusdetectioninsamplescollectedfromtheindopacificregion AT williamskelly methodcomparisonforjapaneseencephalitisvirusdetectioninsamplescollectedfromtheindopacificregion AT zielinskieric methodcomparisonforjapaneseencephalitisvirusdetectioninsamplescollectedfromtheindopacificregion AT iwamiakira methodcomparisonforjapaneseencephalitisvirusdetectioninsamplescollectedfromtheindopacificregion AT homaszachary methodcomparisonforjapaneseencephalitisvirusdetectioninsamplescollectedfromtheindopacificregion AT thomaskaren methodcomparisonforjapaneseencephalitisvirusdetectioninsamplescollectedfromtheindopacificregion |