Cargando…

Method comparison for Japanese encephalitis virus detection in samples collected from the Indo-Pacific region

INTRODUCTION: Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) is a mosquito-borne viral pathogen, which is becoming a growing public health concern throughout the Indo-Pacific. Five genotypes of JEV have been identified. Current vaccines are based on genotype III and provide a high degree of protection for four o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crispell, Gary, Williams, Kelly, Zielinski, Eric, Iwami, Akira, Homas, Zachary, Thomas, Karen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9730272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36504937
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1051754
_version_ 1784845629866901504
author Crispell, Gary
Williams, Kelly
Zielinski, Eric
Iwami, Akira
Homas, Zachary
Thomas, Karen
author_facet Crispell, Gary
Williams, Kelly
Zielinski, Eric
Iwami, Akira
Homas, Zachary
Thomas, Karen
author_sort Crispell, Gary
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) is a mosquito-borne viral pathogen, which is becoming a growing public health concern throughout the Indo-Pacific. Five genotypes of JEV have been identified. Current vaccines are based on genotype III and provide a high degree of protection for four of the five known genotypes. METHODS: RT-PCR, Magpix, Twist Biosciences Comprehensive Viral Research Panel (CVRP), and SISPA methods were used to detect JEV from mosquito samples collected in South Korea during 2021. These methods were compared to determine which method would be most effective for biosurveillance in the Indo-Pacific region. RESULTS: Our data showed that RT-PCR, Twist CVRP, and SISPA methods were all able to detect JEV genotype I, however, the proprietary Magpix panel was only able to detect JEV genotype III. Use of minION sequencing for pathogen detection in arthropod samples will require further method development. CONCLUSION: Biosurveillance of vectorborne pathogens remains an area of concern throughout the Indo-Pacific. RT-PCR was the most cost effective method used in the study, but TWIST CVRP allows for the identification of over 3,100 viral genomes. Further research and comparisons will be conducted to ensure optimal methods are used for large scale biosurveillance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9730272
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97302722022-12-09 Method comparison for Japanese encephalitis virus detection in samples collected from the Indo-Pacific region Crispell, Gary Williams, Kelly Zielinski, Eric Iwami, Akira Homas, Zachary Thomas, Karen Front Public Health Public Health INTRODUCTION: Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) is a mosquito-borne viral pathogen, which is becoming a growing public health concern throughout the Indo-Pacific. Five genotypes of JEV have been identified. Current vaccines are based on genotype III and provide a high degree of protection for four of the five known genotypes. METHODS: RT-PCR, Magpix, Twist Biosciences Comprehensive Viral Research Panel (CVRP), and SISPA methods were used to detect JEV from mosquito samples collected in South Korea during 2021. These methods were compared to determine which method would be most effective for biosurveillance in the Indo-Pacific region. RESULTS: Our data showed that RT-PCR, Twist CVRP, and SISPA methods were all able to detect JEV genotype I, however, the proprietary Magpix panel was only able to detect JEV genotype III. Use of minION sequencing for pathogen detection in arthropod samples will require further method development. CONCLUSION: Biosurveillance of vectorborne pathogens remains an area of concern throughout the Indo-Pacific. RT-PCR was the most cost effective method used in the study, but TWIST CVRP allows for the identification of over 3,100 viral genomes. Further research and comparisons will be conducted to ensure optimal methods are used for large scale biosurveillance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9730272/ /pubmed/36504937 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1051754 Text en Copyright © 2022 Crispell, Williams, Zielinski, Iwami, Homas and Thomas. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Crispell, Gary
Williams, Kelly
Zielinski, Eric
Iwami, Akira
Homas, Zachary
Thomas, Karen
Method comparison for Japanese encephalitis virus detection in samples collected from the Indo-Pacific region
title Method comparison for Japanese encephalitis virus detection in samples collected from the Indo-Pacific region
title_full Method comparison for Japanese encephalitis virus detection in samples collected from the Indo-Pacific region
title_fullStr Method comparison for Japanese encephalitis virus detection in samples collected from the Indo-Pacific region
title_full_unstemmed Method comparison for Japanese encephalitis virus detection in samples collected from the Indo-Pacific region
title_short Method comparison for Japanese encephalitis virus detection in samples collected from the Indo-Pacific region
title_sort method comparison for japanese encephalitis virus detection in samples collected from the indo-pacific region
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9730272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36504937
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1051754
work_keys_str_mv AT crispellgary methodcomparisonforjapaneseencephalitisvirusdetectioninsamplescollectedfromtheindopacificregion
AT williamskelly methodcomparisonforjapaneseencephalitisvirusdetectioninsamplescollectedfromtheindopacificregion
AT zielinskieric methodcomparisonforjapaneseencephalitisvirusdetectioninsamplescollectedfromtheindopacificregion
AT iwamiakira methodcomparisonforjapaneseencephalitisvirusdetectioninsamplescollectedfromtheindopacificregion
AT homaszachary methodcomparisonforjapaneseencephalitisvirusdetectioninsamplescollectedfromtheindopacificregion
AT thomaskaren methodcomparisonforjapaneseencephalitisvirusdetectioninsamplescollectedfromtheindopacificregion