Cargando…

Usual care in a multicentre randomised controlled trial of financial incentives for smoking cessation in pregnancy: qualitative findings from a mixed-methods process evaluation

OBJECTIVES: Financial incentives are recommended by the UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence to aid smoking cessation in pregnancy. However, little is known about how implementation contexts might impact on their effectiveness. Variations in smoking cessation support (usual care) f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McKell, Jennifer, Harris, Fiona M, Sinclair, Lesley, Bauld, Linda, Tappin, David Michael, Hoddinott, Pat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9730354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36600364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066494
_version_ 1784845650454642688
author McKell, Jennifer
Harris, Fiona M
Sinclair, Lesley
Bauld, Linda
Tappin, David Michael
Hoddinott, Pat
author_facet McKell, Jennifer
Harris, Fiona M
Sinclair, Lesley
Bauld, Linda
Tappin, David Michael
Hoddinott, Pat
author_sort McKell, Jennifer
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Financial incentives are recommended by the UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence to aid smoking cessation in pregnancy. However, little is known about how implementation contexts might impact on their effectiveness. Variations in smoking cessation support (usual care) for pregnant women who smoke were examined qualitatively as part of a prospective process evaluation of the Cessation in Pregnancy Incentives Trial (CPIT III). DESIGN: Longitudinal case studies of five CPIT III trial sites informed by realist evaluation. SETTING: A stop smoking service (SSS) serving a maternity hospital constituted each case study, located in three UK countries. PARTICIPANTS: Data collection included semistructured interviews with trial participants (n=22), maternity (n=12) and SSS staff (n=17); and site observations and perspectives recorded in fieldnotes (n=85). RESULTS: Cessation support (usual care) for pregnant women varied in amount, location, staff capacity, flexibility and content across sites. SSS staff capacity was important to avoid gaps in support. Colocation and good working relationships between maternity and SSS professionals enabled prioritisation and reinforced the importance of smoking cessation. Sites with limited use of carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring reduced opportunities to identify smokers while inconsistency around automatic referral processes prevented the offer of cessation support. SSS professionals colocated within antenatal clinics were available to women they could not otherwise reach. Flexibility around location, timing and tailoring of approaches for support, facilitated initial and sustained engagement and reduced the burden on women. CONCLUSIONS: Trial sites faced varied barriers and facilitators to delivering cessation support, reflecting heterogeneity in usual care. If financial incentives are more effective with concurrent smoking cessation support, sites with fewer barriers and more facilitators regarding this support would be expected to have more promising trial outcomes. Future reporting of trial outcomes will assist in understanding incentives’ generalisability across a wide range of usual care settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN15236311.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9730354
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97303542022-12-09 Usual care in a multicentre randomised controlled trial of financial incentives for smoking cessation in pregnancy: qualitative findings from a mixed-methods process evaluation McKell, Jennifer Harris, Fiona M Sinclair, Lesley Bauld, Linda Tappin, David Michael Hoddinott, Pat BMJ Open Smoking and Tobacco OBJECTIVES: Financial incentives are recommended by the UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence to aid smoking cessation in pregnancy. However, little is known about how implementation contexts might impact on their effectiveness. Variations in smoking cessation support (usual care) for pregnant women who smoke were examined qualitatively as part of a prospective process evaluation of the Cessation in Pregnancy Incentives Trial (CPIT III). DESIGN: Longitudinal case studies of five CPIT III trial sites informed by realist evaluation. SETTING: A stop smoking service (SSS) serving a maternity hospital constituted each case study, located in three UK countries. PARTICIPANTS: Data collection included semistructured interviews with trial participants (n=22), maternity (n=12) and SSS staff (n=17); and site observations and perspectives recorded in fieldnotes (n=85). RESULTS: Cessation support (usual care) for pregnant women varied in amount, location, staff capacity, flexibility and content across sites. SSS staff capacity was important to avoid gaps in support. Colocation and good working relationships between maternity and SSS professionals enabled prioritisation and reinforced the importance of smoking cessation. Sites with limited use of carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring reduced opportunities to identify smokers while inconsistency around automatic referral processes prevented the offer of cessation support. SSS professionals colocated within antenatal clinics were available to women they could not otherwise reach. Flexibility around location, timing and tailoring of approaches for support, facilitated initial and sustained engagement and reduced the burden on women. CONCLUSIONS: Trial sites faced varied barriers and facilitators to delivering cessation support, reflecting heterogeneity in usual care. If financial incentives are more effective with concurrent smoking cessation support, sites with fewer barriers and more facilitators regarding this support would be expected to have more promising trial outcomes. Future reporting of trial outcomes will assist in understanding incentives’ generalisability across a wide range of usual care settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN15236311. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9730354/ /pubmed/36600364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066494 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Smoking and Tobacco
McKell, Jennifer
Harris, Fiona M
Sinclair, Lesley
Bauld, Linda
Tappin, David Michael
Hoddinott, Pat
Usual care in a multicentre randomised controlled trial of financial incentives for smoking cessation in pregnancy: qualitative findings from a mixed-methods process evaluation
title Usual care in a multicentre randomised controlled trial of financial incentives for smoking cessation in pregnancy: qualitative findings from a mixed-methods process evaluation
title_full Usual care in a multicentre randomised controlled trial of financial incentives for smoking cessation in pregnancy: qualitative findings from a mixed-methods process evaluation
title_fullStr Usual care in a multicentre randomised controlled trial of financial incentives for smoking cessation in pregnancy: qualitative findings from a mixed-methods process evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Usual care in a multicentre randomised controlled trial of financial incentives for smoking cessation in pregnancy: qualitative findings from a mixed-methods process evaluation
title_short Usual care in a multicentre randomised controlled trial of financial incentives for smoking cessation in pregnancy: qualitative findings from a mixed-methods process evaluation
title_sort usual care in a multicentre randomised controlled trial of financial incentives for smoking cessation in pregnancy: qualitative findings from a mixed-methods process evaluation
topic Smoking and Tobacco
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9730354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36600364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066494
work_keys_str_mv AT mckelljennifer usualcareinamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialoffinancialincentivesforsmokingcessationinpregnancyqualitativefindingsfromamixedmethodsprocessevaluation
AT harrisfionam usualcareinamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialoffinancialincentivesforsmokingcessationinpregnancyqualitativefindingsfromamixedmethodsprocessevaluation
AT sinclairlesley usualcareinamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialoffinancialincentivesforsmokingcessationinpregnancyqualitativefindingsfromamixedmethodsprocessevaluation
AT bauldlinda usualcareinamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialoffinancialincentivesforsmokingcessationinpregnancyqualitativefindingsfromamixedmethodsprocessevaluation
AT tappindavidmichael usualcareinamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialoffinancialincentivesforsmokingcessationinpregnancyqualitativefindingsfromamixedmethodsprocessevaluation
AT hoddinottpat usualcareinamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialoffinancialincentivesforsmokingcessationinpregnancyqualitativefindingsfromamixedmethodsprocessevaluation