Cargando…

Support for healthcare workers and patients after medical error through mutual healing: another step towards patient safety

BACKGROUND: Medical errors, especially those resulting in patient harm, have a negative psychological impact on patients and healthcare workers (HCWs). Healing may be promoted if both parties are able to work together and explore the effect and outcome of the event from each of their perspectives. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aubin, Diane Louise, Soprovich, Allison, Diaz Carvallo, Fabiola, Prowse, Deborah, Eurich, Dean
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9730392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36588324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002004
_version_ 1784845659517485056
author Aubin, Diane Louise
Soprovich, Allison
Diaz Carvallo, Fabiola
Prowse, Deborah
Eurich, Dean
author_facet Aubin, Diane Louise
Soprovich, Allison
Diaz Carvallo, Fabiola
Prowse, Deborah
Eurich, Dean
author_sort Aubin, Diane Louise
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Medical errors, especially those resulting in patient harm, have a negative psychological impact on patients and healthcare workers (HCWs). Healing may be promoted if both parties are able to work together and explore the effect and outcome of the event from each of their perspectives. There is little existing research in this area, even though this has the potential to improve patient safety and wellness for both HCWs and patients. METHODS: Using a patient-oriented research approach with constructive grounded theory methodology, we examined the potential for patients and HCWs to heal together after harm from a medical error. Individual interviews were conducted and transcribed verbatim. We conducted concurrent data collection and analysis according to grounded theory principles. With our findings, we created a framework and visual breakdown of the communication process between patients and HCWs. RESULTS: Our findings suggest that, after a medical error causing harm, both patients and HCWs have feelings of empathy and respect towards each other that often goes unrecognised. Barriers to communication for patients were related to their perception that HCWs did not care about them, showed no remorse or did not admit to the error. For HCWs, communication barriers were related to feelings of blame or shame, and fear of professional and legal consequences. Patients reported needing open and transparent communications to help them heal, and HCWs required leadership and peer support, including training and space to talk about the event(s). DISCUSSION: Our resulting framework suggests that if there was an opportunity for an open and purposeful conversation early or before increased emotional suffering, there might be an opportunity to bridge the barriers, and help patients and HCWs heal together. This, in turn, contributes to improved health quality and patient safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9730392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97303922022-12-09 Support for healthcare workers and patients after medical error through mutual healing: another step towards patient safety Aubin, Diane Louise Soprovich, Allison Diaz Carvallo, Fabiola Prowse, Deborah Eurich, Dean BMJ Open Qual Original Research BACKGROUND: Medical errors, especially those resulting in patient harm, have a negative psychological impact on patients and healthcare workers (HCWs). Healing may be promoted if both parties are able to work together and explore the effect and outcome of the event from each of their perspectives. There is little existing research in this area, even though this has the potential to improve patient safety and wellness for both HCWs and patients. METHODS: Using a patient-oriented research approach with constructive grounded theory methodology, we examined the potential for patients and HCWs to heal together after harm from a medical error. Individual interviews were conducted and transcribed verbatim. We conducted concurrent data collection and analysis according to grounded theory principles. With our findings, we created a framework and visual breakdown of the communication process between patients and HCWs. RESULTS: Our findings suggest that, after a medical error causing harm, both patients and HCWs have feelings of empathy and respect towards each other that often goes unrecognised. Barriers to communication for patients were related to their perception that HCWs did not care about them, showed no remorse or did not admit to the error. For HCWs, communication barriers were related to feelings of blame or shame, and fear of professional and legal consequences. Patients reported needing open and transparent communications to help them heal, and HCWs required leadership and peer support, including training and space to talk about the event(s). DISCUSSION: Our resulting framework suggests that if there was an opportunity for an open and purposeful conversation early or before increased emotional suffering, there might be an opportunity to bridge the barriers, and help patients and HCWs heal together. This, in turn, contributes to improved health quality and patient safety. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9730392/ /pubmed/36588324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002004 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Aubin, Diane Louise
Soprovich, Allison
Diaz Carvallo, Fabiola
Prowse, Deborah
Eurich, Dean
Support for healthcare workers and patients after medical error through mutual healing: another step towards patient safety
title Support for healthcare workers and patients after medical error through mutual healing: another step towards patient safety
title_full Support for healthcare workers and patients after medical error through mutual healing: another step towards patient safety
title_fullStr Support for healthcare workers and patients after medical error through mutual healing: another step towards patient safety
title_full_unstemmed Support for healthcare workers and patients after medical error through mutual healing: another step towards patient safety
title_short Support for healthcare workers and patients after medical error through mutual healing: another step towards patient safety
title_sort support for healthcare workers and patients after medical error through mutual healing: another step towards patient safety
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9730392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36588324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002004
work_keys_str_mv AT aubindianelouise supportforhealthcareworkersandpatientsaftermedicalerrorthroughmutualhealinganothersteptowardspatientsafety
AT soprovichallison supportforhealthcareworkersandpatientsaftermedicalerrorthroughmutualhealinganothersteptowardspatientsafety
AT diazcarvallofabiola supportforhealthcareworkersandpatientsaftermedicalerrorthroughmutualhealinganothersteptowardspatientsafety
AT prowsedeborah supportforhealthcareworkersandpatientsaftermedicalerrorthroughmutualhealinganothersteptowardspatientsafety
AT eurichdean supportforhealthcareworkersandpatientsaftermedicalerrorthroughmutualhealinganothersteptowardspatientsafety