Cargando…
Between the Scenes: Novelty Seeking Beyond Visual Search
Abstract. We constantly move our eyes to new information while inspecting a scene, but these patterns of eye movements change based on the task and goals of the observer. Inhibition of return (IOR) may facilitate visual search by reducing the likelihood of revisiting previously attended locations. H...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hogrefe Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9730397/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36305454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000556 |
_version_ | 1784845660635267072 |
---|---|
author | Nadezhda, Murziakova Dovbnyuk, Kseniya Merzon, Liya MacInnes, W. Joseph |
author_facet | Nadezhda, Murziakova Dovbnyuk, Kseniya Merzon, Liya MacInnes, W. Joseph |
author_sort | Nadezhda, Murziakova |
collection | PubMed |
description | Abstract. We constantly move our eyes to new information while inspecting a scene, but these patterns of eye movements change based on the task and goals of the observer. Inhibition of return (IOR) may facilitate visual search by reducing the likelihood of revisiting previously attended locations. However, IOR may present in any visual task, or it may be search-specific. We investigated the presence of IOR in foraging, memorization, change detection, and two versions of visual search. One version of search used a static search array that remained stable throughout the trial, but the second used a scene flickering paradigm similar to the change detection task. IOR was observed in both versions of visual search, memorization, and foraging, but not in change detection. Visual search and change detection both had temporal nonscene components, and we observed that IOR could be maintained despite the scene removal but only for search. Although IOR is maintained in scene coordinates, short disruptions to this scene are insufficient to completely remove the inhibitory tags. Finally, we compare return saccades in trials without a probe and observe fewer return saccades in tasks for which IOR was observed, providing further evidence that IOR might serve as a novelty drive. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9730397 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Hogrefe Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97303972022-12-08 Between the Scenes: Novelty Seeking Beyond Visual Search Nadezhda, Murziakova Dovbnyuk, Kseniya Merzon, Liya MacInnes, W. Joseph Exp Psychol Research Article Abstract. We constantly move our eyes to new information while inspecting a scene, but these patterns of eye movements change based on the task and goals of the observer. Inhibition of return (IOR) may facilitate visual search by reducing the likelihood of revisiting previously attended locations. However, IOR may present in any visual task, or it may be search-specific. We investigated the presence of IOR in foraging, memorization, change detection, and two versions of visual search. One version of search used a static search array that remained stable throughout the trial, but the second used a scene flickering paradigm similar to the change detection task. IOR was observed in both versions of visual search, memorization, and foraging, but not in change detection. Visual search and change detection both had temporal nonscene components, and we observed that IOR could be maintained despite the scene removal but only for search. Although IOR is maintained in scene coordinates, short disruptions to this scene are insufficient to completely remove the inhibitory tags. Finally, we compare return saccades in trials without a probe and observe fewer return saccades in tasks for which IOR was observed, providing further evidence that IOR might serve as a novelty drive. Hogrefe Publishing 2022-10-28 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9730397/ /pubmed/36305454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000556 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Distributed as a Hogrefe OpenMind article under the license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ) |
spellingShingle | Research Article Nadezhda, Murziakova Dovbnyuk, Kseniya Merzon, Liya MacInnes, W. Joseph Between the Scenes: Novelty Seeking Beyond Visual Search |
title | Between the Scenes: Novelty Seeking Beyond Visual Search |
title_full | Between the Scenes: Novelty Seeking Beyond Visual Search |
title_fullStr | Between the Scenes: Novelty Seeking Beyond Visual Search |
title_full_unstemmed | Between the Scenes: Novelty Seeking Beyond Visual Search |
title_short | Between the Scenes: Novelty Seeking Beyond Visual Search |
title_sort | between the scenes: novelty seeking beyond visual search |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9730397/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36305454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000556 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nadezhdamurziakova betweenthescenesnoveltyseekingbeyondvisualsearch AT dovbnyukkseniya betweenthescenesnoveltyseekingbeyondvisualsearch AT merzonliya betweenthescenesnoveltyseekingbeyondvisualsearch AT macinneswjoseph betweenthescenesnoveltyseekingbeyondvisualsearch |