Cargando…

Between the Scenes: Novelty Seeking Beyond Visual Search

Abstract. We constantly move our eyes to new information while inspecting a scene, but these patterns of eye movements change based on the task and goals of the observer. Inhibition of return (IOR) may facilitate visual search by reducing the likelihood of revisiting previously attended locations. H...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nadezhda, Murziakova, Dovbnyuk, Kseniya, Merzon, Liya, MacInnes, W. Joseph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hogrefe Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9730397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36305454
http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000556
_version_ 1784845660635267072
author Nadezhda, Murziakova
Dovbnyuk, Kseniya
Merzon, Liya
MacInnes, W. Joseph
author_facet Nadezhda, Murziakova
Dovbnyuk, Kseniya
Merzon, Liya
MacInnes, W. Joseph
author_sort Nadezhda, Murziakova
collection PubMed
description Abstract. We constantly move our eyes to new information while inspecting a scene, but these patterns of eye movements change based on the task and goals of the observer. Inhibition of return (IOR) may facilitate visual search by reducing the likelihood of revisiting previously attended locations. However, IOR may present in any visual task, or it may be search-specific. We investigated the presence of IOR in foraging, memorization, change detection, and two versions of visual search. One version of search used a static search array that remained stable throughout the trial, but the second used a scene flickering paradigm similar to the change detection task. IOR was observed in both versions of visual search, memorization, and foraging, but not in change detection. Visual search and change detection both had temporal nonscene components, and we observed that IOR could be maintained despite the scene removal but only for search. Although IOR is maintained in scene coordinates, short disruptions to this scene are insufficient to completely remove the inhibitory tags. Finally, we compare return saccades in trials without a probe and observe fewer return saccades in tasks for which IOR was observed, providing further evidence that IOR might serve as a novelty drive.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9730397
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hogrefe Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97303972022-12-08 Between the Scenes: Novelty Seeking Beyond Visual Search Nadezhda, Murziakova Dovbnyuk, Kseniya Merzon, Liya MacInnes, W. Joseph Exp Psychol Research Article Abstract. We constantly move our eyes to new information while inspecting a scene, but these patterns of eye movements change based on the task and goals of the observer. Inhibition of return (IOR) may facilitate visual search by reducing the likelihood of revisiting previously attended locations. However, IOR may present in any visual task, or it may be search-specific. We investigated the presence of IOR in foraging, memorization, change detection, and two versions of visual search. One version of search used a static search array that remained stable throughout the trial, but the second used a scene flickering paradigm similar to the change detection task. IOR was observed in both versions of visual search, memorization, and foraging, but not in change detection. Visual search and change detection both had temporal nonscene components, and we observed that IOR could be maintained despite the scene removal but only for search. Although IOR is maintained in scene coordinates, short disruptions to this scene are insufficient to completely remove the inhibitory tags. Finally, we compare return saccades in trials without a probe and observe fewer return saccades in tasks for which IOR was observed, providing further evidence that IOR might serve as a novelty drive. Hogrefe Publishing 2022-10-28 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9730397/ /pubmed/36305454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000556 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Distributed as a Hogrefe OpenMind article under the license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Research Article
Nadezhda, Murziakova
Dovbnyuk, Kseniya
Merzon, Liya
MacInnes, W. Joseph
Between the Scenes: Novelty Seeking Beyond Visual Search
title Between the Scenes: Novelty Seeking Beyond Visual Search
title_full Between the Scenes: Novelty Seeking Beyond Visual Search
title_fullStr Between the Scenes: Novelty Seeking Beyond Visual Search
title_full_unstemmed Between the Scenes: Novelty Seeking Beyond Visual Search
title_short Between the Scenes: Novelty Seeking Beyond Visual Search
title_sort between the scenes: novelty seeking beyond visual search
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9730397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36305454
http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000556
work_keys_str_mv AT nadezhdamurziakova betweenthescenesnoveltyseekingbeyondvisualsearch
AT dovbnyukkseniya betweenthescenesnoveltyseekingbeyondvisualsearch
AT merzonliya betweenthescenesnoveltyseekingbeyondvisualsearch
AT macinneswjoseph betweenthescenesnoveltyseekingbeyondvisualsearch