Cargando…

Validating the representation of distance between infarct diseases using word embedding

BACKGROUND: The pivot and cluster strategy (PCS) is a diagnostic reasoning strategy that automatically elicits disease clusters similar to a differential diagnosis in a batch. Although physicians know empirically which disease clusters are similar, there has been no quantitative evaluation. This stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yokokawa, Daiki, Noda, Kazutaka, Yanagita, Yasutaka, Uehara, Takanori, Ohira, Yoshiyuki, Shikino, Kiyoshi, Tsukamoto, Tomoko, Ikusaka, Masatomi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9730570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36476486
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-02061-8
_version_ 1784845703166558208
author Yokokawa, Daiki
Noda, Kazutaka
Yanagita, Yasutaka
Uehara, Takanori
Ohira, Yoshiyuki
Shikino, Kiyoshi
Tsukamoto, Tomoko
Ikusaka, Masatomi
author_facet Yokokawa, Daiki
Noda, Kazutaka
Yanagita, Yasutaka
Uehara, Takanori
Ohira, Yoshiyuki
Shikino, Kiyoshi
Tsukamoto, Tomoko
Ikusaka, Masatomi
author_sort Yokokawa, Daiki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The pivot and cluster strategy (PCS) is a diagnostic reasoning strategy that automatically elicits disease clusters similar to a differential diagnosis in a batch. Although physicians know empirically which disease clusters are similar, there has been no quantitative evaluation. This study aimed to determine whether inter-disease distances between word embedding vectors using the PCS are a valid quantitative representation of similar disease groups in a limited domain. METHODS: Abstracts were extracted from the Ichushi Web database and subjected to morphological analysis and training using Word2Vec, FastText, and GloVe. Consequently, word embedding vectors were obtained. For words including “infarction,” we calculated the cophenetic correlation coefficient (CCC) as an internal validity measure and the adjusted rand index (ARI), normalized mutual information (NMI), and adjusted mutual information (AMI) with ICD-10 codes as the external validity measures. This was performed for each combination of metric and hierarchical clustering method. RESULTS: Seventy-one words included “infarction,” of which 38 diseases matched the ICD-10 standard with the appearance of 21 unique ICD-10 codes. When using Word2Vec, the CCC was most significant at 0.8690 (metric and method: euclidean and centroid), whereas the AMI was maximal at 0.4109 (metric and method: cosine and correlation, and average and weighted). The NMI and ARI were maximal at 0.8463 and 0.3593, respectively (metric and method: cosine and complete). FastText and GloVe generally resulted in the same trend as Word2Vec, and the metric and method that maximized CCC differed from the ones that maximized the external validity measures. CONCLUSIONS: The metric and method that maximized the internal validity measure differed from those that maximized the external validity measures; both produced different results. The cosine distance should be used when considering ICD-10, and the Euclidean distance when considering the frequency of word occurrence. The distributed representation, when trained by Word2Vec on the “infarction” domain from a Japanese academic corpus, provides an objective inter-disease distance used in PCS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9730570
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97305702022-12-09 Validating the representation of distance between infarct diseases using word embedding Yokokawa, Daiki Noda, Kazutaka Yanagita, Yasutaka Uehara, Takanori Ohira, Yoshiyuki Shikino, Kiyoshi Tsukamoto, Tomoko Ikusaka, Masatomi BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research BACKGROUND: The pivot and cluster strategy (PCS) is a diagnostic reasoning strategy that automatically elicits disease clusters similar to a differential diagnosis in a batch. Although physicians know empirically which disease clusters are similar, there has been no quantitative evaluation. This study aimed to determine whether inter-disease distances between word embedding vectors using the PCS are a valid quantitative representation of similar disease groups in a limited domain. METHODS: Abstracts were extracted from the Ichushi Web database and subjected to morphological analysis and training using Word2Vec, FastText, and GloVe. Consequently, word embedding vectors were obtained. For words including “infarction,” we calculated the cophenetic correlation coefficient (CCC) as an internal validity measure and the adjusted rand index (ARI), normalized mutual information (NMI), and adjusted mutual information (AMI) with ICD-10 codes as the external validity measures. This was performed for each combination of metric and hierarchical clustering method. RESULTS: Seventy-one words included “infarction,” of which 38 diseases matched the ICD-10 standard with the appearance of 21 unique ICD-10 codes. When using Word2Vec, the CCC was most significant at 0.8690 (metric and method: euclidean and centroid), whereas the AMI was maximal at 0.4109 (metric and method: cosine and correlation, and average and weighted). The NMI and ARI were maximal at 0.8463 and 0.3593, respectively (metric and method: cosine and complete). FastText and GloVe generally resulted in the same trend as Word2Vec, and the metric and method that maximized CCC differed from the ones that maximized the external validity measures. CONCLUSIONS: The metric and method that maximized the internal validity measure differed from those that maximized the external validity measures; both produced different results. The cosine distance should be used when considering ICD-10, and the Euclidean distance when considering the frequency of word occurrence. The distributed representation, when trained by Word2Vec on the “infarction” domain from a Japanese academic corpus, provides an objective inter-disease distance used in PCS. BioMed Central 2022-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9730570/ /pubmed/36476486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-02061-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Yokokawa, Daiki
Noda, Kazutaka
Yanagita, Yasutaka
Uehara, Takanori
Ohira, Yoshiyuki
Shikino, Kiyoshi
Tsukamoto, Tomoko
Ikusaka, Masatomi
Validating the representation of distance between infarct diseases using word embedding
title Validating the representation of distance between infarct diseases using word embedding
title_full Validating the representation of distance between infarct diseases using word embedding
title_fullStr Validating the representation of distance between infarct diseases using word embedding
title_full_unstemmed Validating the representation of distance between infarct diseases using word embedding
title_short Validating the representation of distance between infarct diseases using word embedding
title_sort validating the representation of distance between infarct diseases using word embedding
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9730570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36476486
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-02061-8
work_keys_str_mv AT yokokawadaiki validatingtherepresentationofdistancebetweeninfarctdiseasesusingwordembedding
AT nodakazutaka validatingtherepresentationofdistancebetweeninfarctdiseasesusingwordembedding
AT yanagitayasutaka validatingtherepresentationofdistancebetweeninfarctdiseasesusingwordembedding
AT ueharatakanori validatingtherepresentationofdistancebetweeninfarctdiseasesusingwordembedding
AT ohirayoshiyuki validatingtherepresentationofdistancebetweeninfarctdiseasesusingwordembedding
AT shikinokiyoshi validatingtherepresentationofdistancebetweeninfarctdiseasesusingwordembedding
AT tsukamototomoko validatingtherepresentationofdistancebetweeninfarctdiseasesusingwordembedding
AT ikusakamasatomi validatingtherepresentationofdistancebetweeninfarctdiseasesusingwordembedding