Cargando…
Optimized patient selection in high-risk protected percutaneous coronary intervention
Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (pMCS) is increasingly used in patients with poor left-ventricular (LV) function undergoing elective high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (HR-PCIs). These patients are often in critical condition and not suitable candidates for coronary artery byp...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9730792/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36518889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suac060 |
_version_ | 1784845759661735936 |
---|---|
author | Leick, Jürgen Werner, Nikos Mangner, Norman Panoulas, Vasileios Aurigemma, Cristina |
author_facet | Leick, Jürgen Werner, Nikos Mangner, Norman Panoulas, Vasileios Aurigemma, Cristina |
author_sort | Leick, Jürgen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (pMCS) is increasingly used in patients with poor left-ventricular (LV) function undergoing elective high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (HR-PCIs). These patients are often in critical condition and not suitable candidates for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. For the definition of HR-PCI, there is a growing consensus that multiple factors must be considered to define the complexity of PCI. These include haemodynamic status, left-ventricular ejection fraction, clinical characteristics, and concomitant diseases, as well as the complexity of the coronary anatomy/lesions. Although haemodynamic support by percutaneous LV assist devices is commonly adopted in HR-PCI (protected PCI), there are no clear guideline recommendations for indication due to limited published data. Therefore, decisions to use a nonsurgical, minimally invasive procedure in HR-PCI patients should be based on a risk–benefit assessment by a multidisciplinary team. Here, the current evidence and indications for protected PCI will be discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9730792 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97307922022-12-13 Optimized patient selection in high-risk protected percutaneous coronary intervention Leick, Jürgen Werner, Nikos Mangner, Norman Panoulas, Vasileios Aurigemma, Cristina Eur Heart J Suppl Best Practice Approach on High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Supplement Paper Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (pMCS) is increasingly used in patients with poor left-ventricular (LV) function undergoing elective high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (HR-PCIs). These patients are often in critical condition and not suitable candidates for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. For the definition of HR-PCI, there is a growing consensus that multiple factors must be considered to define the complexity of PCI. These include haemodynamic status, left-ventricular ejection fraction, clinical characteristics, and concomitant diseases, as well as the complexity of the coronary anatomy/lesions. Although haemodynamic support by percutaneous LV assist devices is commonly adopted in HR-PCI (protected PCI), there are no clear guideline recommendations for indication due to limited published data. Therefore, decisions to use a nonsurgical, minimally invasive procedure in HR-PCI patients should be based on a risk–benefit assessment by a multidisciplinary team. Here, the current evidence and indications for protected PCI will be discussed. Oxford University Press 2022-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9730792/ /pubmed/36518889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suac060 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Best Practice Approach on High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Supplement Paper Leick, Jürgen Werner, Nikos Mangner, Norman Panoulas, Vasileios Aurigemma, Cristina Optimized patient selection in high-risk protected percutaneous coronary intervention |
title | Optimized patient selection in high-risk protected percutaneous coronary intervention |
title_full | Optimized patient selection in high-risk protected percutaneous coronary intervention |
title_fullStr | Optimized patient selection in high-risk protected percutaneous coronary intervention |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimized patient selection in high-risk protected percutaneous coronary intervention |
title_short | Optimized patient selection in high-risk protected percutaneous coronary intervention |
title_sort | optimized patient selection in high-risk protected percutaneous coronary intervention |
topic | Best Practice Approach on High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Supplement Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9730792/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36518889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suac060 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leickjurgen optimizedpatientselectioninhighriskprotectedpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT wernernikos optimizedpatientselectioninhighriskprotectedpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT mangnernorman optimizedpatientselectioninhighriskprotectedpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT panoulasvasileios optimizedpatientselectioninhighriskprotectedpercutaneouscoronaryintervention AT aurigemmacristina optimizedpatientselectioninhighriskprotectedpercutaneouscoronaryintervention |