Cargando…

Assessing the SpO(2) in a random population – Looking for the best among fingers

CONTEXT: Pulse oximetry is one of the most revolutionary methods used to monitor the patients in the clinical setting, particularly intensive care and anesthesia. We usually use the index or middle finger to measure SpO(2) values, but little is known about the inter-digital differences that exist be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agrawal, Prabhat, Pursnani, Nikhil, Gautam, Ashish, Singh, Akhil Pratap, Garg, Ruchika, Pandey, Anjana, Agarwal, Akanshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9730959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36505563
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2596_20
_version_ 1784845797523718144
author Agrawal, Prabhat
Pursnani, Nikhil
Gautam, Ashish
Singh, Akhil Pratap
Garg, Ruchika
Pandey, Anjana
Agarwal, Akanshi
author_facet Agrawal, Prabhat
Pursnani, Nikhil
Gautam, Ashish
Singh, Akhil Pratap
Garg, Ruchika
Pandey, Anjana
Agarwal, Akanshi
author_sort Agrawal, Prabhat
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Pulse oximetry is one of the most revolutionary methods used to monitor the patients in the clinical setting, particularly intensive care and anesthesia. We usually use the index or middle finger to measure SpO(2) values, but little is known about the inter-digital differences that exist between the fingers. AIM: We aim to compare the peripheral capillary oxygen saturation among fingers of both hands. A total of 93 healthy volunteers aged between 18 and 50 years participated in the study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Their SpO(2) values were recorded from each finger with at least 1 minute of resting interval. Their blood pressure, heart rate, and body temperature were recorded as well. RESULT: A total of 930 measurements were obtained from 93 volunteers. The highest average SpO(2) value of right-handed volunteers was measured from the left little finger (98.48 ± 0.62) of right-handed volunteers, and it was statistically significant when compared with the right ring finger, right little finger, left thumb, left index, left middle finger, and left ring finger. The highest average SpO(2) from left-handed volunteers was obtained from the right index finger, but it was statistically insignificant. CONCLUSION: We assume ethnic and climatic differences to play a role in contradictory results noted from previous studies conducted, and this needs to be investigated further. It is recommended that multiple readings may be obtained from other fingers as well before coming to any conclusion as inter-finger variability cannot be ignored.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9730959
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97309592022-12-09 Assessing the SpO(2) in a random population – Looking for the best among fingers Agrawal, Prabhat Pursnani, Nikhil Gautam, Ashish Singh, Akhil Pratap Garg, Ruchika Pandey, Anjana Agarwal, Akanshi J Family Med Prim Care Original Article CONTEXT: Pulse oximetry is one of the most revolutionary methods used to monitor the patients in the clinical setting, particularly intensive care and anesthesia. We usually use the index or middle finger to measure SpO(2) values, but little is known about the inter-digital differences that exist between the fingers. AIM: We aim to compare the peripheral capillary oxygen saturation among fingers of both hands. A total of 93 healthy volunteers aged between 18 and 50 years participated in the study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Their SpO(2) values were recorded from each finger with at least 1 minute of resting interval. Their blood pressure, heart rate, and body temperature were recorded as well. RESULT: A total of 930 measurements were obtained from 93 volunteers. The highest average SpO(2) value of right-handed volunteers was measured from the left little finger (98.48 ± 0.62) of right-handed volunteers, and it was statistically significant when compared with the right ring finger, right little finger, left thumb, left index, left middle finger, and left ring finger. The highest average SpO(2) from left-handed volunteers was obtained from the right index finger, but it was statistically insignificant. CONCLUSION: We assume ethnic and climatic differences to play a role in contradictory results noted from previous studies conducted, and this needs to be investigated further. It is recommended that multiple readings may be obtained from other fingers as well before coming to any conclusion as inter-finger variability cannot be ignored. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-09 2022-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9730959/ /pubmed/36505563 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2596_20 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Agrawal, Prabhat
Pursnani, Nikhil
Gautam, Ashish
Singh, Akhil Pratap
Garg, Ruchika
Pandey, Anjana
Agarwal, Akanshi
Assessing the SpO(2) in a random population – Looking for the best among fingers
title Assessing the SpO(2) in a random population – Looking for the best among fingers
title_full Assessing the SpO(2) in a random population – Looking for the best among fingers
title_fullStr Assessing the SpO(2) in a random population – Looking for the best among fingers
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the SpO(2) in a random population – Looking for the best among fingers
title_short Assessing the SpO(2) in a random population – Looking for the best among fingers
title_sort assessing the spo(2) in a random population – looking for the best among fingers
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9730959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36505563
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2596_20
work_keys_str_mv AT agrawalprabhat assessingthespo2inarandompopulationlookingforthebestamongfingers
AT pursnaninikhil assessingthespo2inarandompopulationlookingforthebestamongfingers
AT gautamashish assessingthespo2inarandompopulationlookingforthebestamongfingers
AT singhakhilpratap assessingthespo2inarandompopulationlookingforthebestamongfingers
AT gargruchika assessingthespo2inarandompopulationlookingforthebestamongfingers
AT pandeyanjana assessingthespo2inarandompopulationlookingforthebestamongfingers
AT agarwalakanshi assessingthespo2inarandompopulationlookingforthebestamongfingers