Cargando…
Is percutaneous nephrolithotomy safe in chronic kidney disease patients!!!
INTRODUCTION: Management of renal calculus in a patient of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is always challenging. Treatment options include extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). With PCNL being gold standard for renal calculus ≥1....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9731184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36506001 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_100_21 |
_version_ | 1784845853106634752 |
---|---|
author | Adiga, Pramod Pudakalkatti, Sanjay Ramachandra Shivakumar, V. Jain, Mayank Sreenidhi, R. Navaneeth Manohar, C. S. Jayaram, Sreenivas Nagabhushan, M. Keshavamurthy, Ramaiah |
author_facet | Adiga, Pramod Pudakalkatti, Sanjay Ramachandra Shivakumar, V. Jain, Mayank Sreenidhi, R. Navaneeth Manohar, C. S. Jayaram, Sreenivas Nagabhushan, M. Keshavamurthy, Ramaiah |
author_sort | Adiga, Pramod |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Management of renal calculus in a patient of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is always challenging. Treatment options include extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). With PCNL being gold standard for renal calculus ≥1.5 cm in normal kidneys, we aimed to analyze the safety and efficacy of PCNL in CKD patients with calculus ≥1.5 cm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty patients of CKD with renal calculus were included in the study: Group A with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≤30 ml/min/m(2) and Group B with GFR >30 <60 ml/min/m(2). The estimated GFR (eGFR) pre-PCNL, peak eGFR on follow-up, and eGFR at last follow-up, stone free rates, and complications were recorded. The CKD stage before and after PCNL were also compared at the last follow-up. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 52 years. A mean of 1.14sittings per renal unit was required for PCNL. Complete clearance was 94% after all auxiliary procedures. The mean prePCNL eGFR was 26.5 ± 4.01 and 43.6 ± 9l. 14 ml/min/1.73 m(2) in Groups A and B, respectively. The mean post-PCNL eGFR was 32 ± 9.94 and 51 ± 8.85 ml/minute/1.73 m2, respectively, in Groups A and B. At a mean follow-up of 180 days, deterioration with the migration of CKD stage was seen in 13 patients (21.6%) out of which 10 patients were of Groups A and 3 in Group B. Six patients (10%) required maintenance hemodialysis. Postoperative bleeding complication requiring blood transfusions was seen in 12 (20%) and 3 (5%) required intensive care unit care postoperatively. No mortality was observed in our study. CONCLUSION: PCNL is an effective management strategy for renal calculus in patients with CKD with an acceptable stone clearance rates and manageable complications. Peak eGFR <30 ml/min/m2 and postprocedure complications predict deterioration and need for RRT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9731184 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97311842022-12-09 Is percutaneous nephrolithotomy safe in chronic kidney disease patients!!! Adiga, Pramod Pudakalkatti, Sanjay Ramachandra Shivakumar, V. Jain, Mayank Sreenidhi, R. Navaneeth Manohar, C. S. Jayaram, Sreenivas Nagabhushan, M. Keshavamurthy, Ramaiah Urol Ann Original Article INTRODUCTION: Management of renal calculus in a patient of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is always challenging. Treatment options include extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). With PCNL being gold standard for renal calculus ≥1.5 cm in normal kidneys, we aimed to analyze the safety and efficacy of PCNL in CKD patients with calculus ≥1.5 cm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty patients of CKD with renal calculus were included in the study: Group A with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≤30 ml/min/m(2) and Group B with GFR >30 <60 ml/min/m(2). The estimated GFR (eGFR) pre-PCNL, peak eGFR on follow-up, and eGFR at last follow-up, stone free rates, and complications were recorded. The CKD stage before and after PCNL were also compared at the last follow-up. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 52 years. A mean of 1.14sittings per renal unit was required for PCNL. Complete clearance was 94% after all auxiliary procedures. The mean prePCNL eGFR was 26.5 ± 4.01 and 43.6 ± 9l. 14 ml/min/1.73 m(2) in Groups A and B, respectively. The mean post-PCNL eGFR was 32 ± 9.94 and 51 ± 8.85 ml/minute/1.73 m2, respectively, in Groups A and B. At a mean follow-up of 180 days, deterioration with the migration of CKD stage was seen in 13 patients (21.6%) out of which 10 patients were of Groups A and 3 in Group B. Six patients (10%) required maintenance hemodialysis. Postoperative bleeding complication requiring blood transfusions was seen in 12 (20%) and 3 (5%) required intensive care unit care postoperatively. No mortality was observed in our study. CONCLUSION: PCNL is an effective management strategy for renal calculus in patients with CKD with an acceptable stone clearance rates and manageable complications. Peak eGFR <30 ml/min/m2 and postprocedure complications predict deterioration and need for RRT. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9731184/ /pubmed/36506001 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_100_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Urology Annals https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Adiga, Pramod Pudakalkatti, Sanjay Ramachandra Shivakumar, V. Jain, Mayank Sreenidhi, R. Navaneeth Manohar, C. S. Jayaram, Sreenivas Nagabhushan, M. Keshavamurthy, Ramaiah Is percutaneous nephrolithotomy safe in chronic kidney disease patients!!! |
title | Is percutaneous nephrolithotomy safe in chronic kidney disease patients!!! |
title_full | Is percutaneous nephrolithotomy safe in chronic kidney disease patients!!! |
title_fullStr | Is percutaneous nephrolithotomy safe in chronic kidney disease patients!!! |
title_full_unstemmed | Is percutaneous nephrolithotomy safe in chronic kidney disease patients!!! |
title_short | Is percutaneous nephrolithotomy safe in chronic kidney disease patients!!! |
title_sort | is percutaneous nephrolithotomy safe in chronic kidney disease patients!!! |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9731184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36506001 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_100_21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT adigapramod ispercutaneousnephrolithotomysafeinchronickidneydiseasepatients AT pudakalkattisanjayramachandra ispercutaneousnephrolithotomysafeinchronickidneydiseasepatients AT shivakumarv ispercutaneousnephrolithotomysafeinchronickidneydiseasepatients AT jainmayank ispercutaneousnephrolithotomysafeinchronickidneydiseasepatients AT sreenidhirnavaneeth ispercutaneousnephrolithotomysafeinchronickidneydiseasepatients AT manoharcs ispercutaneousnephrolithotomysafeinchronickidneydiseasepatients AT jayaramsreenivas ispercutaneousnephrolithotomysafeinchronickidneydiseasepatients AT nagabhushanm ispercutaneousnephrolithotomysafeinchronickidneydiseasepatients AT keshavamurthyramaiah ispercutaneousnephrolithotomysafeinchronickidneydiseasepatients |