Cargando…

Home bias and employee social responsibility: Identification vs. benefit exchange

Employees, as the most valuable assets and critical sources of competitive advantage in enterprises, are among the important stakeholders in enterprises. Employee social responsibility (ESR) has been a continually important research interest in the field of enterprise social responsibility. However,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Tingting, Sun, Wenjing, Rong, Xing, Mu, Jingyi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9731460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36480576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278541
_version_ 1784845907550797824
author Zhang, Tingting
Sun, Wenjing
Rong, Xing
Mu, Jingyi
author_facet Zhang, Tingting
Sun, Wenjing
Rong, Xing
Mu, Jingyi
author_sort Zhang, Tingting
collection PubMed
description Employees, as the most valuable assets and critical sources of competitive advantage in enterprises, are among the important stakeholders in enterprises. Employee social responsibility (ESR) has been a continually important research interest in the field of enterprise social responsibility. However, in the literature, few studies explore how personal features affect employee social responsibility. Thus, sampling China’s listed companies from 2006 to 2019, we investigate how the home bias of senior executives influences enterprises’ employee social responsibility. We identify home bias based on whether a chairperson’s or CEO’s hometown matches the firm’s registration place. Three main results are obtained. First, the home bias of both CEOs and chairpersons can improve the corporate fulfillment of employee social responsibility. Second, further cost-benefit analysis shows that this result is due to not only identification but also benefit exchange. Although senior executives’ home bias significantly decreases employee turnover rate, enterprises absorb more employment, which significantly increases their redundant personnel costs. Therefore, firms should balance the potential benefits and costs incurred by home bias via trade-off. Third, in firms facing less market competition, firms with more governmental subsidies or state-owned firms, senior executives’ home bias has a more significant promoting effect on the fulfillment of ESR, supporting the view of benefit exchange. Accordingly, by extending theories on the effects of senior executives’ home bias and enriching the ESR literature, this paper has important practical value, our findings can guide and promote firms to perform ESR while actively complying with a national policy for stabilizing employment and ensuring people’s well-being.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9731460
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97314602022-12-09 Home bias and employee social responsibility: Identification vs. benefit exchange Zhang, Tingting Sun, Wenjing Rong, Xing Mu, Jingyi PLoS One Research Article Employees, as the most valuable assets and critical sources of competitive advantage in enterprises, are among the important stakeholders in enterprises. Employee social responsibility (ESR) has been a continually important research interest in the field of enterprise social responsibility. However, in the literature, few studies explore how personal features affect employee social responsibility. Thus, sampling China’s listed companies from 2006 to 2019, we investigate how the home bias of senior executives influences enterprises’ employee social responsibility. We identify home bias based on whether a chairperson’s or CEO’s hometown matches the firm’s registration place. Three main results are obtained. First, the home bias of both CEOs and chairpersons can improve the corporate fulfillment of employee social responsibility. Second, further cost-benefit analysis shows that this result is due to not only identification but also benefit exchange. Although senior executives’ home bias significantly decreases employee turnover rate, enterprises absorb more employment, which significantly increases their redundant personnel costs. Therefore, firms should balance the potential benefits and costs incurred by home bias via trade-off. Third, in firms facing less market competition, firms with more governmental subsidies or state-owned firms, senior executives’ home bias has a more significant promoting effect on the fulfillment of ESR, supporting the view of benefit exchange. Accordingly, by extending theories on the effects of senior executives’ home bias and enriching the ESR literature, this paper has important practical value, our findings can guide and promote firms to perform ESR while actively complying with a national policy for stabilizing employment and ensuring people’s well-being. Public Library of Science 2022-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9731460/ /pubmed/36480576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278541 Text en © 2022 Zhang et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Tingting
Sun, Wenjing
Rong, Xing
Mu, Jingyi
Home bias and employee social responsibility: Identification vs. benefit exchange
title Home bias and employee social responsibility: Identification vs. benefit exchange
title_full Home bias and employee social responsibility: Identification vs. benefit exchange
title_fullStr Home bias and employee social responsibility: Identification vs. benefit exchange
title_full_unstemmed Home bias and employee social responsibility: Identification vs. benefit exchange
title_short Home bias and employee social responsibility: Identification vs. benefit exchange
title_sort home bias and employee social responsibility: identification vs. benefit exchange
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9731460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36480576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278541
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangtingting homebiasandemployeesocialresponsibilityidentificationvsbenefitexchange
AT sunwenjing homebiasandemployeesocialresponsibilityidentificationvsbenefitexchange
AT rongxing homebiasandemployeesocialresponsibilityidentificationvsbenefitexchange
AT mujingyi homebiasandemployeesocialresponsibilityidentificationvsbenefitexchange